Practical Reasons Why Vaccine Injuries Are Rarely Reported

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/10/08/vaccine-injuries-vaers-whistleblower.aspx?ui=0c035d8741921863b274f439b28e3fbee64d86205ae1c2ac0e443e0be6921fca&sd=20210518&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1HL&cid=20211008_HL2&mid=DM1013213&rid=1286921875

Ok kids, this patent (apparently owned ultimately by Pfizer) is fascinating:

https://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=11107588&OS=11107588&RS=11107588

Synposis: Every person will be tracked using a “device” (cell phone?) and “scored” as to their vaccination status. Moreover, as you come within proximity of another person, your device will tell you who is vaccinated and who is not, and a value will be generated that will determine that person’s “superspreader” threat based on where they have been recently.

I could be mistaken (the patent seems complicated and a bit vague), but that’s my understanding.

What do you all derive from this?

An Excerpt from the patent document:

"A method of prophylactically vaccinating a population having a plurality of subjects with a vaccine against an epidemic infectious disease, said plurality of subjects each using a smart electronic device, the method comprising: a. a. using an ID for each said smart electronic device for determining a propensity of proximity of each said plurality of subjects; said determining a propensity of proximity comprises: i. at a proximity event, when a particular said smart electronic device of a particular said subject is in proximity of one or more other of said smart electronic devices, transmitting an ID or an indication thereof to said one or more other smart electronic devices and receiving an ID or indication thereof from said one or more other smart electronic devices, by said particular smart electronic device; said proximity event being an event where said particular said subject could, if infected, potentially infect other subjects with said infectious disease; ii. generating a score reflecting a propensity for proximity, according to a plurality of received IDs; said propensity of proximity reflecting a chance of infecting other subjects if said particular said subject becomes infected; b. generating for each said plurality of subjects a prioritization of vaccination based on said score; said prioritization being higher for subjects having a higher propensity of proximity; and c. prophylactically vaccinating particular subjects of said plurality of subjects according to said prioritization."

Check the elites main idea - leaky vaccine

Rather than stop fowl from spreading the virus, the vaccine allows the disease to spread faster and longer than it normally would, a new study finds. The scientists now believe that this vaccine has helped this chicken virus become uniquely virulent. (Note: it only harms fowl). The study was published on Monday in the journal PLOS Biology.

This is the first time that this virus-boosting phenomenon, known as the imperfect vaccine hypothesis, has been observed experimentally.

The reason this is a problem for Marek’s disease is because the vaccine is “leaky.” A leaky vaccine is one that keeps a microbe from doing serious harm to its host, but doesn’t stop the disease from replicating and spreading to another individual. On the other hand, a “perfect” vaccine is one that sets up lifelong immunity that never wanes and blocks both infection and transmission.

Old article about chickens.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/tthis-chicken-vaccine-makes-virus-dangerous

Such vaccine can actually make things WORSE.

And they KNEW exactly

A 2003 experimental observation of SARS vaccine development presciently advised, "Application of a SARS vaccine is perhaps best limited to a minimal number of targeted individuals who can be monitored, as some vaccinated persons might, if infected by SARS coronavirus, become asymptomatic excretors of virus, thereby posing a risk to non-vaccinated people."

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14676007/

massive coverup for natural immunity. whistleblowers directly from pfizer scientists. hidden cameras and microphones.

I have no words here

I prayed to God a lot at this time, and you know that - God answered our prayers. He got the smartest men and women, scientists, doctors, researchers - he got them to come up with a vaccine. This is from God to us, and we have to say thank you, God. Thanks. And I wear my "vaccinated" necklace all the time to say that I am vaccinated. All of you, yes, I know that you are vaccinated, you are the smartest, but you know that there are people who do not listen to God and what God wants. You know who they are. I need you to be my apostles.

Malaysia, vaccines efficiency

• 83% effectively prevent entering the ICU (Department of Int. Therapy)
• 88% effective in preventing death
• 88% effectively reduces the risk of infection
• 86% effectively reduces the risk of symptomatic infections

The study was conducted by the real-world Covid-19 Vaccine Evaluation Unit led by PICK (RECoVaM) led by the Clinical Research Institute (ICR-NIH) of the Ministry of Health.

The study was conducted from April 1 to September 12 with the participation of 14,500,984 fully vaccinated individuals.

Of the more than 14.5 million people who completed vaccinations:

• 953 or 0.0066% were admitted to the intensive care unit.
• 1445 or 0.010% mortality

COVID mutations are happening 5 times faster compared to flu

This is a fast pace of adaptive evolution and it's rare to observe such a strong signal. HA1 in influenza H3N2 as the canonical example of an adaptively evolving viral protein shows dN/dS of ~0.4, or about 5 times lower than what's currently being observed in SARS-CoV-2. 7/12

Despite the appearance of variant SARS-CoV-2 viruses with altered receptorbinding or antigenic phenotypes, traditional methods for detecting adaptive evolution from sequence data do not pick up strong signals of positive selection. Here, we present a new method for identifying adaptive evolution on short evolutionary time scales with densely-sampled populations. We apply this method to SARS-CoV-2 to perform a comprehensive analysis of adaptively-evolving regions of the genome. We find that spike S1 is a focal point of adaptive evolution, but also identify positively-selected mutations in other genes that are sculpting the evolutionary trajectory of SARS-CoV-2. Protein-coding mutations in S1 are temporally-clustered and, in 2021, the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous divergence in S1 is more than 4 times greater than in the equivalent influenza HA1 subunit.

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.09.11.459844v1?fbclid=IwAR0pgrGk5pbBlqwIESmiKzSnUeePyNopvaGgidAnjTS3_BJrl6gs3XKZO1E

https://rumble.com/vmmx8b-hospital-administrator-lots-of-people-will-die-doctors-banned-from-hcqivm.html

Slightly off topic yes, but Just a friendly reminder that Covid/Vaccine related deaths are still a mere blip on the radar compared to stress, cancer, (car) accidents and air pollution. So far, the stress and paranoia from worrying about the vaccine is contributing far more to our death than the virus or the vaccine ever will. The same goes for getting into a car and driving to get (or not get) vaccinated. Also, if anyone is over the age of 50 or will live to be over 50, then it is almost entirely due to modern medical and sanitary developments since 1900. Now this is just a wild guess but probably none of you or anyone you know will die from Smallpox, Rabies, Typhoid, Cholera, Tuberculosis, Pertussis, Diphtheria toxoid, Yellow fever, Influenza, Tetanus toxoid, Rickettsia, Polio, Anthrax secreted proteins, Measles, Meningococcus polysaccharide, Mumps or Rubella. There are reasons for this which you can probably figure out. Now I'm not saying you shouldn't have a healthy skepticism towards Covid-19 and the vaccination process. We should. It is a novel situation that can and will go any which way. But for me the whole reactionary pro-anti-vaxx "debate" feels like gambling on lottery tickets with money we don't have. Regardless, I appreciate Vitaliy keeping this space available for discussion.

8-months pregnant, gets vaccine, baby born with neurological problems: https://www.bitchute.com/video/OfbljhVHCDIZ/

Covid vaccines leading to nervous system inflammatory response:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00415-021-10780-7

@hardimpact

Thanks for the link

This study investigated persistence of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine effectiveness against infection and disease in Qatar, where the Beta and Delta variants have dominated incidence and PCR testing is done at a mass scale.

Estimated BNT162b2 effectiveness against any infection, asymptomatic or symptomatic, was negligible for the first two weeks after the first dose, increased to 36.5% (95% CI: 33.1-39.8) in the third week after the first dose, and reached its peak at 72.1% (95% CI: 70.9- 73.2) in the first five weeks after the second dose. Effectiveness declined gradually thereafter, with the decline accelerating ≥15 weeks after the second dose, reaching diminished levels of protection by the 20th week. Effectiveness against symptomatic infection was higher than against asymptomatic infection, but still waned in the same fashion. Effectiveness against any severe, critical, or fatal disease increased rapidly to 67.7% (95% CI: 59.1-74.7) by the third week after the first dose, and reached 95.4% (95% CI: 93.4-96.9) in the first five weeks after the second dose, where it persisted at about this level for six months.

BNT162b2-induced protection against infection appears to wane rapidly after its peak right after the second dose, but it persists at a robust level against hospitalization and death for at least six months following the second dose.