@mitkoo

MICRON may have chance to become a kind of natural vaccine?

It is clearly 100% bullshit.

In principle, ONS vaccine mortality surveillance reports should provide us with all the information we need to monitor these critical indicators. However, until recently, we did not see a breakdown by age in them, and given the fact that the elderly were initially vaccinated much more often than young people, this made it impossible to assess the effectiveness of vaccination.

Now age data has begun to be added to ONS reports - there are separate groups for ages 60-69, 70-79 and 80+, but only one for 10-59.

At first glance, mortality (for all reasons) in groups 60-69, 70-79 and 80+ decreases after vaccination, and in group 10-59 it increases, but this is only because the latter group is very large and, taking into account a different proportion vaccinated at different ages, such a rough breakdown does not allow evaluating the effectiveness.

But at least for the elderly, do we see evidence of the effectiveness of vaccination?

Alas, this is also in doubt, since there are fundamental inconsistencies in the data, namely:

• in each of these age groups, we see jumps in non-covid mortality among the unvaccinated, going beyond the expected historical static intervals
• even if these jumps took place within historical intervals, they are much higher than similar jumps among vaccinated in the same period
• in previous years, jumps in mortality in groups 60-69, 70-79 and 80+ occurred at the same time. But in 2021, they all peaked at different times, and synchronized with the peak of vaccination programs for these ages.
• the peaks of covid mortality among the unvaccinated do not correlate well with the peaks of infection

There is no reliable legitimate explanation for these anomalies. But the most probable and simple ones are obvious:

• there is a systematic violation of the mortality categories between vaccinated and unvaccinated
• there is a delay or lack of communication about the vaccination performed, especially if it resulted in death
• systematic underestimation of the proportion of unvaccinated
• incorrect definition in the statistics of Covid-mortality

Based on the validity of these assumptions, we tried to adjust the ONS data to estimate post-vaccination mortality correctly, and concluded that the short-term effect of vaccination is not a reduction in mortality, but a spike.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356756711_Latest_statistics_on_England_mortality_data_suggest_systematic_mis-categorisation_of_vaccine_status_and_uncertain_effectiveness_of_Covid-19_vaccination

Most new Covid cases in Denmark occur in people who are vaccinated or boosted - and that is true for both Omicron and earlier variants. More than 76 percent of non-Omicron Covid infections in Denmark are in vaccinated people, along with about 90 percent of Omicron infections.

Further, only 25 of the 561 people currently hospitalized in Denmark for Covid have the Omicron variant.

My son ( four years old ) was playing and suddenly I heard him ...Pfizermannnnn...I thought to myself what the f*... and again...Pfizermannnn... What a world are we living in???!!!...

@Vitaliy_Kiselev

That's disturbing. There are also rumors that the lot numbers from the Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson and Johnson vaccines vary in terms of toxicity.

Video on efficiency

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Q5DjWbyYdvnt/

Mordor lies

The coronavirus pandemic will end when 70% of the population can be vaccinated in six months, otherwise the incidence waves can be counted indefinitely, told Alexander Gintsburg, director of the Gamaleya Research Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology.

“If 70% of the population is vaccinated in six months, then the pandemic will end, then we will open the borders, return to our usual life.

He noted that it is also important to undergo revaccination six months after vaccination.

But, well, lot of EU countries crossed this number long ago, take Italy as example with 90% vaccinated - but they instead went into fascism, not normal previous life.

And Omicron has same quality as Delta

Scientists at the Institute for Primate Research in Göttingen (Germany) have found that the omicron variant of the coronavirus is resistant to major antibodies. The researchers showed that the antibodies of the recovered people practically did not inhibit the omicron variant.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.032

It is around 99% probability that all 3 major COVID variants are lab created.

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla on Monday said two doses of the company’s vaccine may not provide strong protection against infection from the Covid omicron variant, and the original shots have also lost some of their efficacy at preventing hospitalization.

Bourla, in an interview at J.P. Morgan’s health-care conference, emphasized the importance of a third shot to boost people’s protection against omicron.

“The two doses, they’re not enough for omicron,” Bourla said. “The third dose of the current vaccine is providing quite good protection against deaths, and decent protection against hospitalizations.”

Even booster no longer protects you from hospitalization.

Lies and more lies

It used to be that vaccinated people had a better chance of not getting infected than others. Now it seems that the chances are the same for those who are vaccinated and those who have been ill. Will everyone be ill with Omicron?

In a pandemic, both before and now, the chances of getting infected in vaccinated and unvaccinated were and remain almost the same. This is one of the misunderstandings among the population: "If I have been vaccinated, then I will not get infected." No. Everyone gets infected. Vaccination only slightly reduces the chance of developing the disease. Due to the vaccine, the virus can be blocked at a very early stage, after attaching to the epithelium of the upper respiratory tract. In this case, the person will become infected, but without further severe development of the disease. The disease in this case may go in a milder form, since the immune mechanisms will quickly block the virus.

We evaluate the epidemiological effectiveness of a vaccine by what percentage of those vaccinated will develop the disease and what percentage of those who develop the disease will have a severe form of the disease. If the vaccine protects against severe forms, then it is effective.

Will viruses evolve in those who have not been vaccinated or have been ill for a long time, who have a low level of immunity to coronavirus?

Everyone will evolve. But the chance of new variants appearing is much higher in people who have not been vaccinated. An unvaccinated person is, as it were, a springboard for the evolution of the virus. If a person is vaccinated, then the chance that his virus will evolve and be transmitted to someone is much lower, because he may not get sick at all and not become a source of infection.

In a population where there are many unvaccinated people, the chances of the virus evolving are higher, it has more advantages. This explains the many variants of coronavirus, as millions of people around the world are sick at the same time. If the number of these bridgeheads is reduced through vaccination, then the risk of new variants appearing and spreading will decrease.

The latter is a strain or not, depends on vaccination, on the availability of effective antiviral agents, on compliance with anti-epidemic measures. These factors are the main contributors to what we will see next: whether it will be a dozen more new options or whether the pandemic will end at the “omicron”.

According to preliminary data, Omicron is neutralized by antibodies obtained from vaccination with Pfizer and Moderna drugs, 20–40 times worse than Delta. What about our vaccine?

The "omicron" contains many mutations in the surface S-protein, on which the action of vaccines is based. Therefore, concerns about a decrease in the effectiveness of drugs arose immediately. However, as a result of research at the Center. Gamaleya, as well as in Italy on the basis of the Spallanzani Institute, it was confirmed that vaccination with the Russian "Sputnik" reliably protects against the severe course of "omicron", if after six months you undergo a booster vaccination with a one-component vaccine "Sputnik Light".

Developers from BioNTech say that a booster vaccination will need to be done every three months due to the spread of "omicron". What are the prospects for Sputnik V in this regard? Do we also need a booster every three months or less to keep antibody levels high?

As you understand, while this is in some sense assumptions and theories. But today we see that revaccination every six months is enough to maintain a sufficient level of immunity.

In Russia, it is customary to measure the level of antibodies. People are wondering exactly how many antibodies can protect against infection. WHO does not provide such data. Representatives of the Center Gamalei Alexander Gunzburg and Denis Logunov said that 300 international units (BAU) are enough to protect against the delta strain. Does this antibody titer really protect against the virus?

Indeed, opinions were voiced that if 300 and above, then with a probability of 80% you will not get infected, but here I agree with WHO, because measuring antibodies and deciding whether to be vaccinated or not, based on this, unfortunately, has no a scientific basis. The most correct thing is to simply get vaccinated in accordance with the recommendations given now by the Ministry of Health - in six months. In this case, we will achieve the maximum result - both individual and population.

As far as I understand, only virus-neutralizing antibodies can provide protection. Do tests from commercial laboratories show their level and how accurately?

Analysis for virus neutralization is available to few top laboratories. But comparative studies were carried out, where they took a test system that shows virus-neutralizing antibodies, and another system that shows antibodies to all parts of the virus. And there was a weak conditional correlation. Therefore, in a sense, quantitative test systems that are calibrated against test systems that show virus-neutralizing antibodies reflect the real essence. Though not 100%. But determining the amount of antibodies is an empty exercise in terms of making a decision about vaccination.

The level of herd immunity in Russia is now over 60%. A year ago, it was about the need to reach 50% to end the pandemic. Now we are talking about 80% and even about 90%. Is it still worth focusing on herd immunity? Is it achievable at all?

This is a very important concept: the overall epidemic situation depends on what percentage of the population are those who have immunity, are less at risk of getting sick and transmitting the virus. Today it is clear that 60% is no longer enough. Some countries have already reached 80% coverage, but the incidence rate is not decreasing, sometimes even increasing, but it is important to note that their mortality and the number of severe cases are clearly decreasing. What level is considered the one that will protect us or significantly affect the epidemic process? This is definitely above 80%, but ideally the higher the better.

From Interview with Chief freelance infectious disease specialist of the Ministry of Health Vladimir Chulanov

...and if the Harvard study is correct, VAERS data is grossly understated. I think the COVID-19 adverse reactions and deaths are FAR higher. There is either mass formation psychosis OR some nefarious global agenda at work (or both).

Health departments in several states confirmed to The Epoch Times that they are looking into a steep surge in the mortality rate for people aged 18 to 49 in 2021 — a majority of which are not linked to COVID-19.

Deaths among people aged 18 to 49 increased more than 40 percent in the 12 months ending October 2021 compared to the same period in 2018–2019, before the pandemic, according to an analysis by The Epoch Times of death certificate data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).