Personal View site logo
Lanparte Old and New Rigs
  • 179 Replies sorted by
  • @mrmukke

    I'll talk to them again.
  • has anybody got news from lanparte regarding this issue?

    are they still taking care?
  • Those are tilta handles. The guys from lanparte showed me their new handle designs which use the same locking mechanism. Don't know when they will release them.
    An update on the slipping handle front, I've gone about with a dremel and engraved more grooves on the bottom of the ball socket. Now the grip has improved a lot and slippage is not an issue for now.
  • @spreegurke WHERE can I get those handels you posted in this forum... the ones with the rossette locks
  • I have a handle bent up so it's right beside the follow focus wheel and I've noticed it slips if I pick my rig up by it. I think an easy fix for lanparte would be to provide friction grooves over the whole ball socket for the screws to grip into instead of just the top half.
  • I retapped the threat in the rig, but it doesn't change a thing... of course the new thumbscrews run easier, but in terms of locking the handle bars it doesn't help.
    I just wrote Jerry from Lanparte to see, what his opinion is on that.
  • same here. just replaced the new scres but still the problem that i cannot pull the screws tight enough to "lock" the handles. it always depends in which angle you are with the handbars.

    should we really enlarge the whole by drilling? i feel a bit insecure ;)
    after enlarging the wholes, could we pull the screws more tighten?
  • I think I figured out why the screws on my handle are so hard to tighten. I looked at the package that Jerry sent to me, and there was a drill/tap bit. The original tap holes are just a tiny bit too small. I was supposed to tap out a larger whole. Aluminum is pretty soft so apparently the new screws are some what self tapping, which explains why they are so tight.
  • @spreegurke I wish these screws are easier to tighten as well. as for the position of the handle, it should not make much of a difference how you have it. I showed it straight out, since that would theoretically generated the most torque on the joints. As you can tell, my rig is extremely heavy. I had a hard time even holding it in that position. It felt like 15kg at that angle. I have a cavision handle on my second rig, I can tell you that if I put that much torque on it, it wouldn't hold any better. There must be something else wrong with your handle. I'd talk to Jerry at Lanparte to see if he can do something for you.
  • @jaecjaec
    thanks for your review, but tightening the screws with a hex key doesn't make to much sense when your shooting out in the field and need to make adjustments here and there.

    also in your test you have the handle-bars straight at 180 degrees, which you will will normally never have when shooting with the rig. Like I mentioned above, the joint holds up well in that position, even id just locked with the thumbscrews.

    If you mount the handles in "shooting position" like in the picture, it's more or less impossible to lock them firmly with loaded rig and thumbscrew.
    03cf2b43be02c36e94a2cd19d4a850.jpg
    628 x 812 - 78K
  • Here's my quick update on the handle issue:

  • @spreegurke

    As I said, make video of this problem and send a link to Lanparte support.
    I can't help you here.
  • Had another shoot with the rig today.
    I still like the look and feel and the general quality of the parts.

    But the problem with the moving handles remains.
    This time we only had a 5D and follow focus mounted, but even in this lightweigt set up, the ball-joint does not stay in it's locked position.
    Especially when you want to operate the follow focus and hold the rig only with one handle.

    In fully loaded setup (Af100, Monitor, Mattebox...) it's unfortunately not a workable solution at all with this kind of handles.

    @Vitaliy_Kiselev
    you said you don't have this problem with your rig. Who is manufacturer of your handles?

    @lanparte
    do you think you can solve this problem?
  • I am really liking the looks of this rig. I'm interested!
  • Well just received mine. Very well packed and am quite impressed by the rig. Finish seems refined, screws tighten without too much pressure and the rig feels solid in the hand. The handles seem solid to me, they don't need to be over tightened to feel locked in, but time will tell whether they hold up. I'm not carrying much weight though, just the 7d, lens, follow focus and the lcdvf viewfinder.
    Overall very happy with the purchase.
  • @spreegurke

    Can you, please, make video of the problem?
  • Received my new Thumbscrews today, but unfortunately I have receive a second Offset clamp instead of a straight clamp...

    Anyways,while the new screws are definitely an improvement to the sitiation before, I am still not perfectly happy with it.
    The ball joint is very stable when you have the handle straight at 180 degrees, just as the above test suggests.
    But normally you would use the rig with the lower handle in a 90-120 degrees angle, and in that position the problem remains, that the handle is not really staying in the locked position when you move the loaded rig around.
    I thought it probably has to do with the groovings in the ball, which are only in the top part of the ball-joint.

    Also I thought the suggested stainless steel ring seemed to make sense, as the thumscews leave quite some marks in the aluminum counterpart. Or maybe the plastic-material in the counter half shpere does not provide enough grip...

    @lanparte
    did the ring-solution not work for you in your tests?

    P1060857.JPG
    2400 x 1600 - 288K
    P1060858.JPG
    2400 x 1600 - 274K
    P1060859.JPG
    2400 x 1600 - 281K
  • I should get mine this weekend and will do an update review.
  • anybody received the new screws already?
  • @lanparte

    will you still use the stainless steel ring in the pall joint, apart from the replacement of the thumbscrews?
    seems to make perfekt sense.


  • The hex screw in the knob is too thin, that's the reason why some guy's knobs met problem. Right now we use two screws to replace it, all the member who bought the rig will get the replacement. We will ship the replacement this week.

    image

    image

    image

    I missed the pics yesterday

    1.jpg
    720 x 481 - 86K
    2.jpg
    720 x 480 - 96K
    3.jpg
    720 x 360 - 76K
  • The hex screw in the knob is too thin, that's the reason why some guy's knobs met problem. Right now we use two screws to replace it, all the member who bought the rig will get the replacement. We will ship the replacement this week.
  • Handles need fixing.

    I hope that Lanparte will present their current solution.
    We'll wait until first customers will recieve replacements and go from where.
    Un uptil then deal will remain closed, look at Wondlan rigs.
  • @lanparte: Received the rig today. Thumbs up for such a fast delivery. DHL Express rules m8. Sent on saturday, received on monday, wow!

    The quality of the parts is outstanding for the price. Very precise cuts, you dont have to pull the screws too tighten to lock the rods, really nice matt finished black colour. All in all the "look & feel" is perfect and the price is more than fair. My advice for this product!

    After the feedback in the past, i'm a little bit afraid of pulling the handles too tight and waiting for a solution for this, too. Your concept of a "force-support" is obvious and i got it, but adding a 2nd screw could be necessary as well ;) to be on the safe side.
  • @Vitaliy
    >You need counterweight.

    I found this, which should attach also to 15mm rods. Any other suggestion?
    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/5194-REG/Manfrotto_172_172_Counter_Balance_Weight.html