@Shon

You have not added grain to the clip? Do color correction? In some frames visible fibers, like bristles or hairs on the film.

If you're talking about the vid I posted then yea, there is actually some film-grain I added.

I want to analize edited files that are not recognized by stream pharser. Is there another program, or coud stream pharser do it in the future?

Here is a music video.... really just a concert with some story added in... I shot ALL on the LOWRIDER patch :)-

• I did let FC7 log and transfer out of lazyness...so I was working working the footage as prores 4:2:2hq...typically I transcode everything I shoot with 5dtorgb but I didnt intend to flesh this out the way I did... graded in FCP7 with ColorGhear Pro.

I'm using Apocalypse_Now_-_Cluster_v7 sharp2 and i get broken images. What could be causing the problem?

I'm shooting stock footage and I love the Apocalypse_Now_-_Cluster_v7 sharp2 when it works. Can anyone recommend the best hack for shooting stock footage?

I'm shooting the Cherry Blossom in DC and I need a the best hack that works!

I have used Flow motion v2.0.2 and Sanity 5.1 but I still like Apocalypse_Now_-_Cluster_v7.

Thanks for the help!

@jramos I really like Cluster V7 sharp 2 as well, but for me I found that it does not span reliably. The Cluster X Nebula Trial 6b and Slipstream #3 are very reliable in terms of spanning and provide excellent quality as well.

Best Regards

Thanks everyone for the reply. I had the same errors shooting at night. I will download and reinstall the hack. I usually record no more then 20 seconds per shot for stock footage. Unfortunately I don't have the original but I'm planing to shoot this weekend. I will try the hacks you mention Azo/thepalalias. I hope I get some god footage. I'm using the 95ms card.
It seems that the error happens when the scene has a lot of details.

The picture below was shot the same day, same card and it works fine.

Lovely shots @rorykane

@rorykane that was beautiful!

here's a little boring test of a x1.5 anamorphic i did the other day,... Apocalypse Now Boom + contax zeiss 50mm planar + Izukar scope x1.5 anamorphic lens (fixed focus dual optic, not mirror prism).

mostly shot at f2.8-56 with a bunch of ND filters and a polarizer stacked in front.

straight out of the camera, no levels/effects of any kind as this is sample video for the auction listing of the Izukar scope. ( if you're interested just search for Izukar scope on that big ass evil auction site :P )

absolutely looooving Boom!

@mangotree72 Thanks man! All shot with 12mm Magic SLR. Wide open in some cases to bring out the haze and flare. Picture profile setting was Smooth (all settings to -2). Went for a warm custom white balance to get as much of the look in camera. It was a bright day so 320 ISO was used throughout. I also shot with a 1/30 shutter and Variable ND. The look was a quick and dirty curves adjustment. It's maybe a little excessive. The blacks and whites aren't balanced either. For pro job, I guess I would have also done some secondary on the skin tones. I like the foliage but the skin tone is too yellow. I added film grain (which didn't quite translate well after Vimeo's compression). For online streaming, I think you want to use either a lot of grain (after de-noising and encoding at the highest bitrate possible) or none at all. 20% grain is just going to muddy your footage. While I'm not necessarily proud of the technical aspects of the video, I'm proud of the subject matter. My niece is growing up fast and this is a lovely reminder of her sense of adventure.

Short film I made in black and white with Intravenus v1

@weomck.. Nice footagte. What picture profile do you use with IV2?

these are two uncorrected intraVenus V2 frames.

640iso / 3200K f 2.0 / Canon FD 28mm -2 -2 -2 -2 dynamic

shot under 2x 8watt fluorescent bulbs inside a soft box type of thing.

this isn't my sharpest lens; especially not at 2.0 but is it normal that this footage seems to lack some resolution? When you view it at full resolution there seems to be a lot of detail missing. Is this because of the low light and/or the lower bit rates?

should I look for better lenses or is there another way to get more sharpness?

I find it odd because everyone on the forum is looking to make their footage less sharp, while imo my frames are still lacking a bit of resolution, even when there is ample light available.

Thank you for the hard work! Sharing is Caring :)