Personal View site logo
Make sure to join PV on Telegram or Facebook! Perfect to keep up with community on your smartphone.
Please, support PV!
It allows to keep PV going, with more focus towards AI, but keeping be one of the few truly independent places.
The Swiss Knife Camera
  • Hi everyone,

    This post might come a bit as a surprise but I can assure that this a serious matter. You also don't know me but I'm happy to answer any questions

    I would ask people to refrain themselves from being over negative or talking for the sake of it.

    In my life, I have seen the evolution of cameras from Super 8 BOLEX to today's one. Did I shoot anything worth talking about, short answer is no. what I love is film and technology. Dare I say good and sexy technology!!! I wish I could make my own film but let's face it I'm probably no Spielberg, on the other hand I love design and technology and have been successful at it.

    I have been reading forums since they actually exist and I was also very involved in the 35mm adapters and made my own. So my quest like many of you is to have a camera that gives you, not a cinematic image but the image you need to have for the project you are working on. But let's face it, a camera is not only about the image, is it?

    Now this is the way I see things and by saying it I do not intend to offend anyone, it just feels to me like the plain truth.

    Big corporation like Sony, Panasonic, Canon, Nikon will always give us a bit more or bit less but never the perfect tool as they need to ensure future sales. Of course we can hack some of them but is it a solution in the long run?

    High end, Arri and Red cost a fortune and it not accessible to many of us.

    Blackmagic comes around and produce a sexy little beast but it's a box with some fancy features and in my opinion it's lacking of some features that makes it not so cool to use. this is not THE CAMERA in my eyes.

    So where does it leave us? I know that some beautiful film can be shot with DSLRs and other cameras but how cool would it be to have the Swiss knife camera?

    So can we pull it off? Well I can't answer that. Can we try… Well we have to, don't we?

    So here is my "Crazy" idea…

    I would like to find the people to be able to build such a camera. Sensor Guru… Electronic Guru… Software Guru… Optic Guru… Sound/electronic Guru… Storage Guru…

    I'll keep the design part for myself and another person already on it. But Ideas are always welcome.

    If you believe that you are one those guys please send me a personal message. If you are but want to know more, then just ask your question on that thread so everybody can see my answer.

    So that we are clear. This is not a job offer as such. There will be no salary. So you will ask, what's in it for me?

    Well, that's simple, it's fully funded by myself, and for those of you elected to be part of the project, you will each get a substantial stake in the company. Remember this is not for everyone as you will need to put some time on top of your day job so you need to be very passionate about it.

    I am based in UK on the M4 corridor between London and Bristol. I would like the candidate to be in this area so it would be easier for meetings but then again if you have what it takes and live outside of the UK, we can always Skype each…

    The goal is pure and simple. a camera so modular that everyone should find happiness in it. The software will be open source so everyone can have go and add plugins to it.

    Price target, as cheap as possible but of course those people that will put the work in will want to make money out their shares so we will see about that when the time comes.

    Features?

    Well do I really need to repeat what as been said by you guys a million time?

    Short non exhaustive list:

    Global shutter - Sensor size? dunno yet! Plenty of DR for sure. internal ND filters Interchangeable lens mounts No moire, No Aliasing 24, 25, 30, 60, 120, 240 Frames per second. The higher rates might just be burst but that will do. Standard removable batteries Balanced sound, 48v, proper mechanical knobs for sound adjustment and dedicated panel. SDI - HDMI outputs. SSD storage

    Design - Super ergonomic, remember this is a tools for people to work.

    Do i need to go on????

    Anyway guys.. Please be constructive.

    Thank you

  • 34 Replies sorted by
  • @anthonybert

    Rather then closing I suggest to structure your thought and present them in systematic form.
    Show people expected market size for the product.
    As in fact you are searching investors, people who will invest their skills and time into something.

  • Cameras exist in a time loop. By the time this camera would be developed, bugs worked out, etc, etc, it would be obsolete. There would be something better and faster. And even if we could use it for a month or so, would it be worth the work? Anyone who wants to make a product should just do it. And BTW, @anthonybert, there are plenty of technically talented people here. You didn't make a mistake in looking for them here. They simply may not share your vision which is just the way things are sometimes. No biggie. They just think if you can't even put together a cardboard prototype--like the Olly pen mockup--or a 3D rendering that a camera might even be harder to build.

  • In the early days of motion pictures, everyone built their own cameras. There's a story of how Cecil B DeMille went out to shoot some test footage and it all came out like a streaking blur. What happened was, they also had to punch their own sprocket holes on the film, but his measurements were way off!

    Nothing wrong with building your own digital cinema camera, but nowadays you need at least a 3D vaporware picture of the proposed camera to be taken seriously. To start the drooling. The Love Guru says "shame on you all! You might have whacked the next Jim Jannard" :)

  • ...whoa...that was fast ! I do like robertGL's idea, except make it a s8 cartridge....with mechanical shutter already in those s8 beaulieus.

    but really...being in the eng field for 15 years, the complexity surely outweighs any proposed benefits. Anyone watching Red knows that you need more than a few dudes in a garage. It ain't Apple in '76. And while I wouldn't want to discourage any garage genius, I'd recommend you made a few billion in the sunglasses business first.

  • @Vitaliy_Kiselev I do not seem to find the close topic button. Do you mind closing it for me.

    Thank you.

  • All,

    After taking all your advice and feedback on board, I realise that it was probably a mistake to look for engineers on the forum.

    I do not wish to waste people's time and will explore a different avenue to reach my goal.

    Thanks for all your feed back. I will now close that thread.

    Thank you

  • I wish you luck but I think anybody entering the camera business is out of their mind now.. it's a crowded market and the margins are probably razor thin. Most of the pros already are loyal to a brand, and the pricing is being undercut all the time as well. The only suggestion I can say is maybe go after film cameras.. I would love to have a digital mag for my aaton LTR for instance

  • @anthonybert

    Things that I told have nothing to do with MBA, but they are related to question on how serious your proposal is.

    I suggest to change first post to make it contain all data about yourself, contact information, that exact qualification you need (and it is quite strange to search for camera engineers on forums) and all details properly sorted.

    Is it your business - http://www.textanywhere.net/ ?

  • I would suggest changing the topic title to something like "Personal-View Member's Camera" it might generate a bit more interest.

  • @Vitaliy_Kiselev May I kindly refer you to my previous answer.

    Market size analysis and all the things??? Did you get you MBA with honour? Just kidding :)

    I feel that you haven't read what I've been writing. I'm trying to focus on getting a team of passionate people to build a camera. the Camera would be the product. The product determine your market segment.

    We are not a business yet, far from it. What we could be is an R&D team that will decide on a product. If the first focus is how do we make money, then we are doing the wrong thing. (I've learnt that one from one of your users many many moons ago. I was young and he taught me the virtu of focusing on doing the best product I could rather than aspiring to financial reward)

    At the end of the day I do not want to have to fight my corner every 5 minutes.

    If you fear that I'm not equipped to lead such a venture, that is your right. I can only tell you that I have been the CTO and co-founder of my business that has now run successfully for 12 years and counting, So I feel like I do qualify in understanding how to start and progress a business. Trust me I have made my fair share of mistakes and learnt from them

    The only question is: Is there someone in this forum that have the skills and would be happy to join the team.

    If the answer is no then that's fair enough and I will close this post. I will not loose any sleep over it. That was just a genuine offer to the people of this forum that I felt would be interested. That's all.

  • @eatstoomuchjam Thanks for your input, and you are absolutely right that the risk of becoming the next DB is definitely present.

    I did look at apertus in great details. I also agree that they seem to be struggling. But then again in my current business (telecom applications) I have seen software that took a really long time to develop by competitor and that we were able to put to market in record time. Now I will agree that it may not apply in that case but still the application that I'm dealing with are pretty high end as well.

    It is possible, that in the end if I do not find get traction with engineers, I might just get in touch with Apertus and see if they could do with an external investment which my be beneficial for both parties.

    Thanks

  • @anthonybert I was mostly joking by comparing you to Digital Bolex, but I also had a point. End-to-end design of a camera for filmmakers is really hard. If you underestimate the difficulty, you risk becoming the next DB - a company with a neat idea for a camera, but only a weak ability to execute.

    Additionally, have you considered spending time with the Apertus group? They've been working on an open source digital cinema camera for some time now and you seem to share some goals in common. At the least, following their progress may be a way to warn yourself of possible pitfalls. https://www.apertus.org/

  • @anthonybert

    I am serious, show the business plan and preliminary design. With market size analysis and all the things.

  • @Jasketti All fair comments... In this world things seems to be obsolete as soon as they are on the shelf.

    But is it really obsolete? or is it the people that have so much choice that they are attracted to regular change hence making new products' life ephemeral?

    Anyway I take on board what you said and can assure you that the goal is definitely to stay as cheap as possible otherwise there is no point. I do like the BMCC price point I just feel that more can be done for the same price.

  • @anthonybert I like and respect what you are doing and offering here! I am sorry I have nothing to offer execpt my comment and thoughts on the subject.

    I just wondered how usable would a modular camera be in the end?

    Now dont get me wrong, I like the idea, but what part if anything of a digital camera is able to hold its ground for longer than few years these days? Maybe the casing, mechanical buttons, lens mounts, perhaps viewfinder... but most if not all of the electronics are going to suffer from old age sooner or later. And if they are built to take the challenges of the future (make them extremely top notch / high speed) they will inavoidably become really expensive. Ofcourse one could argue that if a camera "good enough" could be built today for decent cost, it would not need to be updated and thus had no need to be modular. A bit of an paradox.

    Anyway I really hope this gets going and you find the rigth gurus. And in the end evolving into a camera that is truly good enough in as many aspects as possible while maintaining reasonable pricetag <5KEUR

  • Andy, Thanks for your input, and I agree that protoboarding will be a good start. My intention is not to do it on an open forum, but more on a selected forum :) and feed back progress in the open forum.

    I like your idea about the BMCC, Just not sure I like the dependence on Blackmagic. and of course this project can never give us access to market which is not so good for people putting their time in. I want to have fun, not sit with lawyers for years on end for patent/design infringement. Although Rental could be achievable, those guys in the state who created a mod version of the go pro are going for rental. But Rental is another beast especially when it come to electronic goods.

    The BMCC produce a great image as we all know, and they also have a great tech, Using yours andy I feel that the form factor, usability and software could have a greater scope for not much more money. Now a BMCC in an XL2 body and software, I'd buy it tomorrow.

    In the I know this is a difficult task. If it comes to nothing I can always fee l that I have try to reach out :)

    Life has been good to me and I just want to re-energise the word "Enterprise". I just think we need more of it at the moment.

  • @Vitaliy_Kiselev

    I've known Anthony Bert for 15 years and have been a co-director with him on some rather successful companies, so I can confidently say that he could finance such a project easily, whether he should is another matter.

    Anthony has been making films for his own satisfaction for 25+ years.

    He has access to the right type of mechanical engineering for casings, lens mounts etc. He also has access to a number of electronics engineers, however I would say that none of these has experience of the very very high data rates that would be found in such a camera. They are rather experienced in embedded systems and control schemes, some of which translate to this project.

    I had a long look at some of the application notes for sensors last night and came to the conclusion that the project is possible on a breadboarded basis, using the prototype kits available from the sensor manufacturers. In this way one would get a camera going with some type of output.

    Personally, I estimate that the work needed to go from bench to camera is too much for an 'open hardware' 'open source' team of loosely connected people.

    My caveat is that if Anthony could find the right engineer to bridge the gap (high parallel data rates) he could have a chance. Trouble is at this data rate products are damn hard to get through CE approval (I know, I've been there!!)

    My counsel is that this would be a bloody big undertaking! PV might uncover the right person, but equally re-engineering a BMCC as open-source might achieve the same goal: The 'Ubuntu' Camera.

    @anthonybert Actually matey --- these guys are being skeptical not pessimistic, which is OK, remember they don't know you!

  • @Vitaliy_Kiselev you are absolutely right. The business plan and model will be delivered to the final elected team. I'm just trying to get things organised. So here is the initial agenda.

    1 - Is there enough talented people here to form a team

    2 - Select the team out of those people. At then the business model and plan will be disclosed to those selected.

    3 - After everyone agrees on the terms we will publicly disclose our plans on this forum. with at minimum weekly update from all department.

    I do not believe that the business plan has to be disclosed now as the only question is:

    Are you interested and what are your skills?

  • @anthonybert

    Can you just make real business proposal post even draft one, if you are so serious as you say.

    How you expect to find professional engineers, how much time they must spend working on it, your financing amount and plan, all the details.

  • I do understand how it looks on the side and I'm not asking you to have faith and jump you eyes close.

    I'm actually asking people to be a bit more open minded and take the opportunity to listen to someone who admits that he is not an expert in sensor, or electronic but realise that there is an opportunity to create something great with great people.

    When I say I'm financing the project, bizarrely it means that I'm financing the project.

    Here it's the same. I will buy all necessary components for research and will finance the production of the camera until it is a final product that can hit the market. Each participant will have no personal expense except their time. But sensors, software optics everything else need will be purchased by myself and delivered to the person in charge of his department.

    I did no say that I had no skills at all, I just don't think that I am an expert in some fields and therefore there is no need for me to talk for nothing. Now Yes I have a lot of skills, and as I previously said, if enough competent people are interested for each section needed to produce that camera, they will have the full resume of my personal achievements and skills. Then they can make their mind up wether they think I can drive the team to produce this camera or not.. This is as simple as that. I have worked in the UK for the past 13 years with some serious engineers and I never encountered such pessimism. And I thought I was the pessimistic one :)

  • I'm actually financing the people from this forum to get what they want.

    What you mean under "I'm actually financing" ?

    Do you really understand how it looks from the side?

    Do you understand what you are not first, second or even third who came to forums to make camera from "ground up" without any skill or expirience?

    May be I am being harsh, but show why people can have even tiny amout of trust.

  • @Vitaliy_Kiselev, Yes I'm well aware of the Epic story regarding the Bolex.

    Did you read my post at the top. Is it for me to show you the designs? I'm actually financing the people from this forum to get what they want. so It's for those who will be participating to show us what they are made of. I am not one of this people pretending to be someone I'm not. this is a project from the ground up.

    Everyone have been giving their opinions for years about what should be a great camera. Everyone have been boasting about their competencies. Well now the money is on the table, I hope that the serious people of this forum will shine. and Vitaly you are welcome to join.

    The only thing I can tell you is that design wise, I would like the final product to be very close (external design wise) to the Canon XL2. IT was a lovely ergonomic camera to use and things just felt in the right place.

  • Also, to all non-believers, please have a read on EosHD:

    http://www.eoshd.com/content/10517/an-incredible-achievement-roald-christessen-builds-his-own-raw-cinema-camera-and-grading-software

    Nothing is impossible and that's my personal view.

  • @anthonybert

    This comments was not about you, if you know last year history :-)

    Otherwise, show us prototype, design, boards, etc. Some serious things.

  • @MikeLinn yes it's complicated. I have access to 2 brilliant engineers. My skills are design and management.