As a little experiment today I tried hooking the Zoom H1's output to the GH2's microphone input through a cheap headphone volume control. Much to my surprise, it worked perfectly! There's virtually no difference between the sound of the H1's recording and the GH2's. This cheap headphone volume control even has two outputs, so I can connect headphones for monitoring.

$5 at Radio Shack: http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?productId=3268770

I set the GH2 input level to 1, the Zoom H1 output level to 30, and adjusted the volume wheel to about 1/3.

@Rambo As it only provide output adjustment it won't act as a preamp. You'll get a max output level of -30 dBu so gain at the recorder input will still be needed.

@Danyyyel I've been using FR2 (not LE) for a while and compared it to HD-P2 and SD. The analog audio of the FR2 was quite good for the price at the time it hit market, almost on par with SD of the 722 generation. I guess it's the same pre and AD that have been re-used for the LE so the audio performance should be good. The limiter however were of no use at all, sounding bad and not preventing AD clipping (I'm not even sure they were analog).

I think it's often overlooked because its size and control layout make it hard to use in an audio bag, and the market for "cheap" recorder went toward small handheld recorders with built-in mics, but yes it is a cool piece of gear.

The HD-P2 is probably the cheapest way to get 2 tracks @ 24 bits / 48 kHz with timecode but it's nowhere near a SD regarding sound and build quality or ergonomics.

I always see people talk between low end and highend audio, I mean from zoom h4n to sound devices. I have been always going from one side to the other. Doing some research and some price change has brought two recorders that people don't seem to talk at all and could be the end and be all budget of middle ground of audio recorders.

The two are the Fostex FR-2LE ($ 600) and the Tascam HD-P2 ($ 650/700). If you look here http://www.avisoft.com/recordertests.htm they seem to be very very close to the sound devices. If you go here http://www.wingfieldaudio.com/portable-recorder-noise.html and listen to the fostex it is a bit difficult to find any difference to the sound devices. The best test is with the dynamic mic where the preamps are really stressed, just listen to the zoom h4n to hear the difference compared to the SD 722 and Fostex.

Now I am no expert in sound, but I feel that these two recorders are really interesting for the low buget people. A very very close sound quality Sound device recorder for about $ 600/700 all in one. Ok they are about twice the price of a zoom recorder, but about 3 time less a sound device recorder and quality wise much closer to the latter. It would be interesting to get the more knowledgeable sound guys opinion.

@Rambo

Check new Tascam DR100 MK II.

@Rambo The attack and release (basically how fast it reacts to loud sound and then how fast it goes back to normal when things get quiet) are probably optimised for speech. I guess it might be ok for speech applications but if it is, it will probably do horrible things to music. But as @duch says, depends what you want to use it for. It will never replace being careful with audio levels but could be useful in extremely uncontrolled situations where you'd otherwise get distortion.

@Rambo What do you want to use it for ?

What do you guys think of this http://www.markertek.com/Audio-Equipment/Audio-Processing/Compressor-Limiters/Radio-Design-Labs/EZ-MCP1.xhtml

@mpgxsvcd Yeah that looks right to me. as long as it doesnt have the 3 black stripes around it your good.

Does anyone know if the rode microphones come with a cable at all? Do they include the 3.5mm with the rode mics?

@mpgxsvcd Yeah that's right just like I said be careful not get the cellphone adapters they don't work right. Go to a guitar center or something and get the right adapter. Problem with ordering online is ...you don't always get whats in the picture.

@mpgxsvcd I would a imagine you need a 3.5 to 2.5 stereo adapter. Just be careful not to get the cellphone ones that have 3 rings on the plug, the proper one should have only two rings.

@stonebat > camera body should have taken digital audio a while ago, it's a shame most of them still can't (and won't in a near future).

@DouglasHorn > I think you're right regarding spending most of the budget on mics. Even if every single part is important, great microphones (and knowing how to use them) will shape most of your sound. Cheap mike often sounds all "whoa" when listened alone but can't stand direct comparison with their higher end brothers. I used a Sennheiser MKH416 on my boom for a while and I was happy with it ... until I used Schoeps mikes.

The rig I'm currently using :

Sennheiser 5000 series radio mic with Tram TR50 or Sanken COS11 lavs
Schoeps CMIT-5U on boom (either with rycote or cinela mount)
AAS Mixy field mixer
Sony PCM-M10 recorder

No audio feed to the cam (Canon EOS), clap sync.

I'm very happy with the PCM-M10, it's a really small and well built unit, with quite good audio quality for the price and incredible battery life (almost 24 hour with a pair of NiMh batteries). The provided remote is very useful but the buttons are not "clicky" enough to be absolutely sure that recording is engaged without a look to the unit, so be careful when using it on fast jobs. The on-board mike quality was a nice surprise too.

When more tracks or TC is needed I usually rent a Sound Devices 744T or 788T.

I'll probably buy either a Zaxcom Nomad or an AAS 4Minx in the next six month.