Most new Covid cases in Denmark occur in people who are vaccinated or boosted - and that is true for both Omicron and earlier variants. More than 76 percent of non-Omicron Covid infections in Denmark are in vaccinated people, along with about 90 percent of Omicron infections.

Further, only 25 of the 561 people currently hospitalized in Denmark for Covid have the Omicron variant.

In principle, ONS vaccine mortality surveillance reports should provide us with all the information we need to monitor these critical indicators. However, until recently, we did not see a breakdown by age in them, and given the fact that the elderly were initially vaccinated much more often than young people, this made it impossible to assess the effectiveness of vaccination.

Now age data has begun to be added to ONS reports - there are separate groups for ages 60-69, 70-79 and 80+, but only one for 10-59.

At first glance, mortality (for all reasons) in groups 60-69, 70-79 and 80+ decreases after vaccination, and in group 10-59 it increases, but this is only because the latter group is very large and, taking into account a different proportion vaccinated at different ages, such a rough breakdown does not allow evaluating the effectiveness.

But at least for the elderly, do we see evidence of the effectiveness of vaccination?

Alas, this is also in doubt, since there are fundamental inconsistencies in the data, namely:

• in each of these age groups, we see jumps in non-covid mortality among the unvaccinated, going beyond the expected historical static intervals
• even if these jumps took place within historical intervals, they are much higher than similar jumps among vaccinated in the same period
• in previous years, jumps in mortality in groups 60-69, 70-79 and 80+ occurred at the same time. But in 2021, they all peaked at different times, and synchronized with the peak of vaccination programs for these ages.
• the peaks of covid mortality among the unvaccinated do not correlate well with the peaks of infection

There is no reliable legitimate explanation for these anomalies. But the most probable and simple ones are obvious:

• there is a systematic violation of the mortality categories between vaccinated and unvaccinated
• there is a delay or lack of communication about the vaccination performed, especially if it resulted in death
• systematic underestimation of the proportion of unvaccinated
• incorrect definition in the statistics of Covid-mortality

Based on the validity of these assumptions, we tried to adjust the ONS data to estimate post-vaccination mortality correctly, and concluded that the short-term effect of vaccination is not a reduction in mortality, but a spike.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356756711_Latest_statistics_on_England_mortality_data_suggest_systematic_mis-categorisation_of_vaccine_status_and_uncertain_effectiveness_of_Covid-19_vaccination

@mitkoo

MICRON may have chance to become a kind of natural vaccine?

It is clearly 100% bullshit.

oMICRON may have chance to become a kind of natural vaccine?

The US authorities said that the majority of cases in the country with the omicron strain of coronavirus have been vaccinated. Such data are published in a report by the American Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. According to the ministry, 34 out of 43 cases of the disease were detected in people who were vaccinated, and 14 of them even received a booster dose of the drug (underwent revaccination).

By tracking the evolutionary trajectories of vaccine-resistant mutations in more than 2.2 million SARS-CoV-2 genomes, we found that the occurrence and frequency of vaccine-resistant mutations strongly correlate with vaccination rates in Europe and America.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355224465_The_evolution_of_the_mechanisms_of_SARS-CoV-2_evolution_revealing_vaccine-resistant_mutations_in_Europe_and_America

Vaccines are "very efficient"!

https://www.brighteon.com/bb491753-0590-4211-89cd-11bb7729f313

On Wednesday morning, Pfizer and its partner BioNTech releasing data showing that three doses of their best-selling jab were effective enough to neutralize the omicron variant in lab tests (not in actual humans).

As the two companies scramble to produce an omicron-specific version of their jab, the data released this morning showed that a third dose increased antibodies as much as 25-fold compared with only two doses, the companies said.

So, now vaccination will require 3, not 2, doses one after another. And booster each 3 months.

Very important news

The Omicron strain can be dangerous for people who have already been ill with COVID-19, which may mean that the new version of the infection has a property that frightened scientists from the very beginning of the pandemic - an antibody-dependent increase in infection. This is evidenced by data published by scientists from South Africa research, said the head of the laboratory of especially dangerous infections of the Federal Research Center for Fundamental and Translational Medicine, Professor of Virology Alexander Chepurnov.

If you believe this text, then those who have already been ill with the coronavirus are infected with the new strain more often than those who did not get sick at all. This may indicate that there are some mechanisms that create additional opportunities for the virus to enter the body. This is reminiscent of something that was feared from the beginning - a phenomenon called antibody-dependent exacerbation of infection.

If this property of the omicron strain is confirmed by research, then new types of vaccines, built on a different principle, may be needed to effectively combat it.

In reality it is usually vaccines that cause antibody-dependent issues.

mRNA vaccines dramatically increase risk of developing heart diseases from 11% to 25%

Twitter corporation declared scientific publication as UNSAFE for you!

As predicted, they started to block sites only because it has "false information"!

Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712

@firstbase

This makes no sense, is nonsensical science and will result in catastrophe. How can it not? Sure seems like criminal activity to me.

It makes perfect sense.

Remember all this masses that so much liked Adobe subscriptions and told me to shut up? Well - they will eat their pudding soon.

Yikes! Yeah, let's continue to suppress our natural immune systems to the point where we are completely dependent on mRNA chemical responses to various maladies. This makes no sense, is nonsensical science and will result in catastrophe. How can it not? Sure seems like criminal activity to me.