Personal View site logo
Threadripper 39xx and TRX40, TRX80 Threadripper new chipsets coming
  • 120 Replies sorted by
  • Vitaliy_KiselevVitaliy_Kiselev

    Review

    image

    image

    image

    image

    https://3dnews.ru/1003181/obzor-protsessora-amd-ryzen-threadripper-3990x

    Short summary - software optimization for such number of cores sucks.

    Memory also can pose additional problem as AMD in last moment disabled half of the channels due to fear that they won't be able to solve newer models.

    sa12127.jpg
    662 x 446 - 44K
    sa12128.jpg
    679 x 302 - 29K
    sa12129.jpg
    680 x 298 - 34K
    sa12130.jpg
    678 x 300 - 36K
  • Vitaliy_KiselevVitaliy_Kiselev

    One more review

    Big note - Premiere performance is changing significantly from version to version (so ignore this charts if you view it 6 or more months from now), and still Premiere code is horrible and sale very badly on large number of cores.

    image

    image

    image

    https://www.techspot.com/review/1980-amd-threadripper-3990x/

    sa12131.jpg
    722 x 801 - 80K
    sa12132.jpg
    718 x 808 - 76K
    sa12133.jpg
    715 x 805 - 92K
  • Vitaliy_KiselevVitaliy_Kiselev

    Very interesting issues considering threads number that most other reviewers missed

    image

    image

    image

    image

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/15483/amd-threadripper-3990x-review/3

    sa12136.jpg
    676 x 379 - 64K
    sa12137.jpg
    646 x 170 - 27K
    sa12138.jpg
    648 x 168 - 25K
    sa12139.jpg
    644 x 170 - 29K
  • Vitaliy_KiselevVitaliy_Kiselev

    On overclocking

    image

    image

    https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-threadripper-3000-overclocking-deep-dive-asus-rog-zenith-ii-extreme/8.html

    Note that 2990WX actual benchmarking require very precise setup and use of additional utilities like (that they did not use) https://bitsum.com/portfolio/coreprio/

    sa12146.jpg
    490 x 518 - 46K
    sa12147.jpg
    492 x 526 - 58K
  • Vitaliy_KiselevVitaliy_Kiselev

    Windows has issue with scaling

    image

    https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=3990x-windows-linux&num=1

    sa12215.jpg
    741 x 403 - 49K
  • Vitaliy_KiselevVitaliy_Kiselev

    We've spent some time re-testing our Threadripper 3990X with a direct update from Windows 10 Pro to the Enterprise version and noticed little to no performance improvement outside of the expected standard deviation we experience with our benchmarks

    image

    https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-threadripper-3990x-performance-windows-10-enterprise

    sa12242.jpg
    598 x 633 - 51K
  • Vitaliy_KiselevVitaliy_Kiselev

    Real hutzpah

    image

    Normalized die cost for 64 core CPU is about 1.4x than for 16 core CPU (as it also include GF io chip die).

    Just feel that AMD is doing.

    As this guys already can move 48 core to 64 core into mainstream market (<$500 CPUs).

    This is why capitalist must be hanged.

    sa12287.jpg
    783 x 463 - 73K
  • Vitaliy_KiselevVitaliy_Kiselev

    Overclocked Threadripper 3970X consumption

    image

    sa12515.jpg
    678 x 488 - 37K
  • MikeLinnMikeLinn

    3980X exist in nature, but AMD do not want to release it for now

    image

    sa12882.jpg
    372 x 417 - 48K
  • Vitaliy_KiselevVitaliy_Kiselev

    Ryzen Threadripper PRO coming soon

    image

    8 channel chipset and CPUs finally will come (AMD in the last moment stopped them from appearing previous time as they had been afraid that it can compete with Epyc chips).

    sa13726.jpg
    746 x 618 - 46K
  • Vitaliy_KiselevVitaliy_Kiselev

    More on Pro models that are rebranded Epycs

    image

    image

    image

    sa13740.jpg
    800 x 233 - 37K
    sa13741.jpg
    800 x 402 - 49K
    sa13742.jpg
    800 x 219 - 49K
  • MikeLinnMikeLinn

  • Vitaliy_KiselevVitaliy_Kiselev

    TR Pro is an OEM only product

    image

    image

    image

    sa13805.jpg
    800 x 390 - 52K
    sa13804.jpg
    574 x 214 - 36K
    sa13806.jpg
    800 x 398 - 58K
  • Vitaliy_KiselevVitaliy_Kiselev

    WRX80 boards finally coming

    image

    sa14380.jpg
    645 x 418 - 62K
  • brudneybrudney

    I wonder when they'll change the socket again. Next or the generation after next. Most likely the latter, to not anger people too much. DDR5 will be a perfect excuse.

  • Vitaliy_KiselevVitaliy_Kiselev

    Threadripper PRO 3995WX benchmark

    image

    sa14544.jpg
    747 x 630 - 82K
  • MikeLinnMikeLinn

  • MikeLinnMikeLinn

  • Vitaliy_KiselevVitaliy_Kiselev

    PRO

    AMD today announced that the Ryzen Threadripper PRO workstation processors will be directly available for purchase from March 2021. Until now, the processors were exclusively available as options for the Lenovo ThinkStation P620 workstation. The processors are being released alongside a small selection of compatible motherboards by ASUS and GIGABYTE. The Threadripper PRO processors are built in the sWRX8 package, and compatible with the AMD WRX80 chipset. From what we can tell, these processors are not compatible with sTRX4 motherboards.

    What sets the Ryzen Threadripper PRO apart from the regular Ryzen Threadripper 3000 series is that it's a fully unlocked "Rome" multi-chip module re-configured for the workstation, with up to 64 CPU cores, 8-channel DDR4 memory, and 128 PCI-Express Gen 4 lanes. In comparison, the Ryzen Threadripper 3000 chips only feature 4-channel memory, and fewer 72 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the SoC. The PIB (processor in box) retail package of the Ryzen Threadripper PRO looks rather plain compared to the PC enthusiast-focused Threadripper 3000, with a simple paperboard box that packs the processor, an Asetek AIO CLC adapter, and a spring-loaded screwdriver that's tuned for the sWRX80 socket.

  • Vitaliy_KiselevVitaliy_Kiselev

    Pro CPUs pricing

    • Threadripper Pro 3995WX: 64 cores and 128 threads, $ 5490
    • Threadripper Pro 3975WX: 32 cores and 64 threads, $ 2750
    • Threadripper Pro 3955WX: 16 cores and 32 threads, $ 1150
Add a Comment