this guy doesn't use boom mics or lavs or tripods for sit-down interview. just a zoom H4 placed near the speaker. it shows a nice comparison between the recorder and camera mics.

I'll test the onboard mics. I guess my ultimate dream is commercial distribution, I kind of think if someone wants to show a documentary then little flaws won't stop them. Some of my favourite docs are a bit rough looking, like Dig! and My Date With Drew. I know the latter was just using a consumer camera and no shotgun and that got to theatre release.

I'm open to advice though. I checked the Oscars rules (just to find the ultimate specs ;) ) and they were more interested in the spec like 5.1 audio etc not the actual quality?

*I do probably intend to use the lav for interviews, onboard just for if i capture some voices I didn't plan on but helps somehow but mainly for general ambiance is the plan.

@suresure123 - is your doc intended for broadcast? You'll never get through broadcast tech review imagining you can use onboard dslr microphones for your audio. There's a reason that audio from a shotgun mic is the first thing a sound dubber reaches for...

I wonder if anyone who has used the EM5 OMD and The EM5 OMD MKii can say if the quality of the built in mic on the MKII are as good as the Sema mic was used with the EM5 original?

@eatstoomuchjam, can you recommend a specific model tripod (apart from the gorillapod)?

and about the lav and h1: if you're interviewing a group of people. you would need a set for each person? or could you just place a recorder without the lav as close to all the speakers as possible to avoid having to lav each speaker?

For interviews you definitely want the lav and h1 on your subject. The shotgun will almost always be better for nats/backup mic than the onboard mic so I would suggest plugging it in to the cam. If you want a degraded audio effect I would recommend doing it in post. Working with limitations, like having one lens, can be helpful in getting more creative shots but a good understanding of perspective and having a zoom lens will improve your footage dramatically. Also waiting for natural light to be perfect is romantic but is not very efficient will lead to a much longer shoot. If you have the time and depending on the subject matter that might be just fine, but a long doc project with lots of interview sound can become discouraging after a while especially for a one man band. As far as tripods, I think you need one for interviews. I realize it's static but if you like the omd because it always looks like it's on a tripod then there's rly no problem. If you feel the shot is boring then you need to study more into composition and lighting. Also context in the frame is a big deal to me for interview shots in doc work. And if you want your subjects to give good sound then you need to be engaged in a good conversation and practice good interview etiquette. Seems obvious but that doesn't mean it's something to ignore. Tripod helps with this tremendously because the other person will be very distracted and uncomfortable if you seem to be fiddling with or looking at the camera the entire time.

What software are you using to edit? Most of them have auto-sync features, now. There is no "too good" audio in video world, believe me... Best way to do interview with no budget is the lavalier H1 combo, I use the AT3350, but I want to try that Giant Squid: it sound more robust and a lot easier to manage in post.

Image stabilization, even on a monopod, is not a replacement for a tripod. There are plenty of small/portable tripods available (heck, you could even consider a gorillapod).

I am by no means an expert. I'm still learning myself. But I think perhaps you're being too quick to dismiss using a monopod. In my opinion, they are a much more portable and inexpensive alternative to a tripod. And image stabilisation or not, doesn't fatigue in holding the camera hand-held come into play at some point?

Also, I think your point about audio is interesting. Maybe the shotgun mic is not necessary / over-rated.

Stabilization is great and everything, but it is not a tripod. Great tripods can be expensive, but a cheap tripod is infinitely better than no tripod.

If you don't need a fluid head and you are using lightweight equipment, there is no reason you need to spend a ton of a tripod. My favorite set of legs cost me <$150 used. I would get something rated for at least three times the weight of your system. Tiny leg diameters pick up shudder and other issues- you want something with a little mass to it, even if that seems unnecessary. Smith-Victor BH5 is a good (non-fluid) head for low cost.

The 10x zooms are great and useful, but I would find them limiting as a one lens kit due to their apertures. Waiting for usable light outdoors will be a long wait. M4/3 lenses hit diffraction around F8, and at 1/50 you will he hard pressed even at base ISO in daylight.

If you are going to do the 14-42, I would really urge you to consider the 4/3 14-54mm or 12-60mm. They are both better lenses with wider ranges and faster apertures than the 14-42. The penalty is that they are bigger and won't autofocus as fast. The 12-60 has actual manual focus (not focus by wire), which in my opinion is a major plus. The 14-54 is a great lens and can be had for under $100 used.

If all you have is a camera and a single prime, you will be able to find a way to work. Maybe those limitations will help you. My guess is that after you shoot a bit, you'll start to understand why things like fast, constant aperture zooms and good tripods are so desirable. I would argue you would be better off buying a cheaper camera (GH2s still hold there own against anything out there...) and put your money towards quality glass and support.

i have some questions. what about a monopod instead of tripod? for sound, use onboard shotgun as much as possible and a zoom external recorder as a backup. in post, use the onboard sound and sync the externally recorded sound when the onboard sound isn't good.

if this is really a one man show, buy a tripod. don't conduct interviews looking through a viewfinder. typically, you don't want the subjects looking straight at the camera.