If you want it to look like Technicolor's "Cinestyle" then you'd expose properly and then raise the midtones with a levels adjustment in post. There's detail in the GH2 shadows (see video below).

The real question is why you'd want it to look like Cinestyle. Cinestyle isn't supposed to be a look for delivery -- it's supposed to retain detail in shadow areas and highlights for work in post.

Don't forget that movie productions use vast amounts of lights, bounce materials, light blocking materials, color gels, ND materials, time of day, etc, to get things to look good. Don't expect to get anything even close without at least using some of these.

In the case of movies, dynamic range is totally overrated. Dynamic range isn't what makes things "pop", that's "contrast" that does that. contrast can be as small as lighting up a face to make it brighter than the body or background. In effect, you are actually DECREASING the dynamic range of the frame but introducing more contrast.

However, in that clip, you can clearly see that the girl's face is illuminated by something from the left. Probably a bounce card or small light, or light from a building.

I think you´ll get approximately what you want by using picture profile smooth or standard and dial down contrast, sharpening, saturation and noise reduction.. Some use -2 on all, but you have to try yourself to see what you want. Great link from Gabel, too.

Some lighting ?