Personal View site logo
GH5 Panasonic camera, from anticipation to love or hate
  • 2083 Replies sorted by
  • @crowbar I understand where you coming from I myself wish they could implement those awesome upgrades. The tech trends says something else "Incremental" But will see when it comes out.

  • OK, thanks, I get it and depending on the reality of it all, how it turns out, we all know what we want and we'll eventually find out what we're offered and then we'll determine our next camera purchase...I only weigh in here hoping that Panasonic monitors the thread and makes upgrades in the GH5 to make a real difference unlike say the GH3 did...which I have also but we all know the Hacked GH2 beats the pants off it when it comes to video..I hardly ever use that GH3, it is my D cam, used only for multi cam shoots as camera #4.

  • @crowbar Blackmagic is a smaller company compared to the others & they have nothing to lose, plus their moto was to democratise high end gear. The bigger companies have soo.. many different lines of cameras, they will not purposely devalue their Higher end cameras no.. no..

  • OK right about Pocket but it seems as the GH line has evolved, yes it serves both photographers but now perhaps video/film makers even more. I like many bought the GH4 mainly for motion picture quality although I am also happy for it's still modes. As I learn more and am able to discern differences in digital film quality and how it grades, I grow to desire a better codec than 8 bit 420 for 4K & V-Log which is why I never really consider the Sony A7s/ll as an upgrade except for low light. Personally I'll keep my GH4 as a great hybrid but as for upgrading to a film camera that really makes a difference I'll probably end up having to save my dollars a lot longer for perhaps the URSA mini 4.6 K. But really I would rather spend $3000 less for a GH5 (not to mention I already have lenses) if it has a much improved codec that can handle V-Log well without all that nasty banding etc. Meanwhile the GH4 and BMPCC are just fine.

  • @crowbar but that is a video only device. It is purpose built, not a photography based camera.

  • @joethepro, TrackZillas & apefos: you might be right but on the other hand, Blackmagic put 10 bit 422 in the $1000 Pocket regardless of their higher end cameras & perhaps it has been their top selling camera? The Pocket is not a high/end expensive camera yet I often use it instead of my GH4 because of 10 bit ProRes 422.

  • @apefos By heavy post production, I assume you mean green screening? 10 bit could also be said to only be used for heavy post when you are pushing the footage alot and need it not to cause banding...

  • It makes more sense to be 4k 10bit 420, because ultra hd bluray is like that, and the new prosumer cameras must follow ultra hd bluray. 422 is only for high end expensive cameras for heavy post production cine/broadcast market.

    5k could be useful for reframing and stabilization and final output to 4k.

  • It's unlikely they will implement any of those Specs.. The most I see them Implementing would be internal 8bit 4:2:2 and keeping all the GH4 features. The best policy is be happy with the camera you have right now and make the best out of it.

  • @Tron Yah in that case, I just say there's no way they would put 10 bit 4:2:2 in cam on the GH5. That would directly compete with their higher end stuff. I cant imagine seeing this in prosumer cameras for another 3-5 years at least. Its going to be 8 bit 4:2:2, max.

  • I'd be surprised if anything other than 4:2:2 subsampling was implemented with 4K 10 bit. Current spec for AVC-Intra is 4K 10 bit 4:2:2 @ 320-800 Mbps for 24/30/60P. There's also 4K 12 bit 4:4:4 @ 640-800 Mbps for 24/30P. If they implement a long-GOP version they can probably get it down to 150-200 Mbps for smaller file sizes. I don't see any 10 bit 4:2:0 formats under AVC-Ultra v2.0 except for a proxy version http://pro-av.panasonic.net/en/sales_o/p2/AVC-ULTRAoverview.pdf

  • @joethepro - amen to 4:2:2 - so much more important than 10bit

  • When you are all talking about 10 bit, Im assuming you are all expecting 10 bit 4:2:0, right? I cant imagine they would put 10 bit 4:2:2 in cam... Id personally rather have 8 bit 4:2:2 than 10 bit 4:2:0 in cam. EDIT: Well... I guess Im just thinking about 1080p. With 4k, 4:2:0 color is still at 1080p detail levels, so that is manageable. 10 bit would be nice at that point for banding issues, but man 4:2:2 makes things noticeably crisper.

  • @mrbill 5K would allow for a near perfect crop of the sensor (5120 x 2880 frame vs. 5184 sensor width) with no image downscaling required in camera. It also allows for 15Mp individual frame grabs vs. 8Mp grabs w/4K. So nearly twice the resolution available for much larger print sizes from the video stream.

    5K would probably be presented as a flagship feature and many like myself would typically use it for specialist projects (fashion hybrid) and stick to 4K 10 bit for the majority of work. That being said it would be a good marketing tool for Panasonic to stay one step ahead of the competition on paper and for good or bad, the marketing people usually win when it comes to prosumer feature releases, not Hollywood DPs.

  • @mrbill Are you sure about that? The ever loved aging Alexa is 2.8k, a good bit higher than 2k, and everyone raves about using it. Why would anyone complain about 4k, especially if the standard is moving towards that anyway? Film scans provide at least 4k resolution.... I dont see the issue.

  • Why would anybody want 5k resolution? There's a near revolt going on amongst Hollywood DOP's about having 4K foisted on them, and the the vast majority prefer to shoot at 2k. Dynamic Range and color science is king

  • I think in many ways, the GH5 will have to compete with the Nikon D500. Double the resolution on the TouchScreen and keep the swing out feature. Quadruple the Low Light Performance Much faster Processor for Better 4k Codec and 1080P120.

    If it cannot do this, I will pass on the upgrade and keep my GH4 for travel and hiking.

  • I think we're definitely going to see 10 bit internal this year, all of the 4K TV manufacturers are touting HDR/10 bit as the next big thing for 4K TVs. Panasonic has been pushing the GH series as the best fit for consumer & pro TV content creation, so it would only be fitting to support this feature.

    In addition, Ambarella's recently announced chipsets (H1, H2, H12) provide 4K 10 bit in H.265 Main Profile at up to 60P in addition to high framerate H.264 8 bit at up to 120P. http://www.ambarella.com/products/flying-cameras#H12

    If Panasonic achieves the same level of performance or better we will be in for a real treat. I'm guessing: 20 Mp BSI Sensor, 5K 24/30P 8 bit, 4K 24/30/60P 10 bit, 4K 120P 8 bit, HD 24/30/60P 10 bit, HD 0-240 VFR mode 8 bit, 5K Timelapse 8 bit, 4K Timelapse 10 bit

  • Thanks RRRoger, agreed regarding most picture profiles except when recording in V-LOG log apparently the external recorder does make for significant improvement. Being able to record in V-LOG on the GH5 internally in 10 bit would eliminate the need for an external recorder and motivate many of us to upgrade I think...

  • CrowBar,

    Perhaps you should just forget about an external 4k recorder. Although there was a huge improvement in my A7s, it was hard to see any improvement in my GH4 unless you use a much higher bitrate.

  • Put aside low light for a bit, I own both a GH4 and also a blackmagic pocket. So far I have been unable to buy the shogun for improving in the GH4's internal codec due to the significant and high cost. Therefore when I want a more cinematic look and excellent skintones straight out of the cameraI with even just 1 LUT applied in post, I use the BMPCC even though it is a much more difficult camera to shoot with. However even with just internal 8 bit 4K, the GH4 is still my main choice for anything with a lot of detail such as certain wide shots and nature - leaves, grass etc. What will make me buy a GH5 is internal 10 bit, 4K, ProRes 422 recording with a new sensor that has a bit more of that organic look which somehow blackmagic achieves with even their smaller sensors! Otherwise I will be saving for the new URSA mini 4.6K. I hope you hear that loud and clear Panasonic!!!

  • Considering Panasonic wouldn't pay the relatively small amount of tax to dodge the 30 min recording limit I really can't see them putting a larger and more expensive sensor in a GH5 that wouldn't give any advantage with their existing lens range. I will be very interested to see what they do though...

  • I don't expect this to happen but if the GH5 had a 8MP sensor instead of the 16MP sensor would't the low light performance double? Since you only need 8MP or so for 4K

    Kind of how the A7S's sensor is able to catch more light than the A7R.

  • something like this, the proper color sensor:

    5120 x 2700 for Cine 4k, 23,920 x 12,614mm (APSC S35 size)

    4800 x 2700 for Ultra HD, 22,425 x 12,614mm (APSC S35 size)

    and 4096 x 2160 or 3840 x 2160 inside the M43 crop using all area from the M43 image circle.

    apscs35m43.jpg
    1280 x 720 - 131K
  • Signal processors. I think they can reduce the noise on existing sensors if they work on the signal processors; there is still a lot of room there.

    They could also get rid of that annoying 4k crop factor, if they did a full sensor readout and downsize it to 4k / UHD internally, like Samsung did. This I think also reduces the recorded noise.

    For more light and bokeh they could also produce a set of fast video lenses.

    Electronic ND filter.

    Square sensor, so in 1:1 (anamorphic!) the full image circle can be used, and in 4k a GH2 like width.

    Phase detect focus would awesome.

    And 5 axis IBIS, that works with video.

    4k 50/60p 200Mbs