I don't think much of Andrew's intellectual grasp or critical acumen. He is obviously an enthusiastic DSLR video hobbyist and has put a great deal of focused energy into creating and building a popular web site, but much of what he says is nonsensical to me. It's more of an unfiltered stream of discovery diary of an overheated geekboy opining about things he barely understands than an experienced pro sharing his wisdom. I find much of his site to be riddled with errors, misinformed pronouncements, and just plain wrong advice. All too painfully, it reminds me of how I used to write product reviews when I was in my early 20s, like Doug in "UP" shouting, "SQUIRREL!" and jumping up and down for a while before the next "SQUIRREL!".

If EOSHD.com somehow got you interested in DSLR video and spurred you to drill down, fine. No shame in that. But to consider the site any kind of authority or source of expert opinion is a mistake, I feel. It's just a kid who buys or is swagged lots of expensive toys and blogs about them from the perspective of an enthusiastic amateur. That's not a sin, but it is also not anything more than a kid playing with toys.

All that said, I absolutely respect Andrew's right to have an opinion and a web site, to have his say and let readers make of it what they will. He doesn't even begin to deserve to be called juvenile names and treated like a pariah. It's gutless to do so, and I would hope that guys here would knock it off. Every time I see someone do it I think oh, that guy too? Sheesh.

@ickejohannes I know...you would think there be a bit of maturity on this forum?

Anyway G6 nice. Would be nicer if these companies just make a cam like this with video ergonomics rather than dlsr. Its clear many just buy the for video use.

http://www.eoshd.com/content/10824/panasonic-g6-review-the-gh2-redux

EOSHD has put up a review of the G6 for video, and it is very favourable about the G6.

"When you consider the all-round package, the Panasonic G6 is the best mid-range interchangeable lens camera for video available. Image quality for video is unmatched for the price, although the Nikon D5200 is better in low light the G6 offers way more features and 1080/60p into the bargain. It also offers insane levels of detail at 1080p which the D5200 simply cannot match (sharpening in post or not). It has less moire and aliasing than the Canon 50D in raw or any APS-C Canon DSLR for that matter… Or a Sony NEX! Yet it offers 1080/60p into the bargain."

Edit: "Go to Voldemort hideout..." LOL, I see what happened there.....

@cjdincer, the GH2 its worse in low light conditions, usable up ISO 800, but between ISO 1000, 1250 and 1600 is marginally acceptable, but already noticeable noise.

I'll buy the G6 only when there is a Firmewareupdate and the hack of Vitaliy - mud and artifacts in the green stuff

I change my GH2 for a G6. :p

@mikelinn promo videos are not helpful. They are not credible or honest.

@Doctor The stabilizer shots were with a GoPro Hero3 Black. There are two zoom shots that are with a TM700. All the rest are with the G6.

@c3hammer

For the really wide shots in the most recent video you posted, which lens were you using?

Maybe this belongs in the GH3 thread, but here goes anyway. I'm sure the G6 is a fine camera, but if I were upgrading from the GH2, I would recommend the GH3 instead. First of all, I think many of the problems GH3 owners have mentioned (poor EVF, lack of peaking and zebras, setting info disappearing after 10 seconds, etc.) are greatly exaggerated. But the main reason to go for the GH3 are the codecs. And the MOV files are great to work with compared to AVCHD. Given a choice, I would never go back to AVCHD.

Impressive stuff Pete ! wow your video of the deer is great ! I wonder if Panasonic will make a G6 in Real Tree camo for you!! that would look cool! Im a G6 owner too but Ive not tested the ETC mode yet

http://vimeo.com/groups/dmcg6/videos/69642404

which profile and what settings in aperature, contrast ect.