14.2 stops in RAW ISO 100 STILLS.
@fatpig where did you get that info about 14.2 stops of DR , from what i have seen , it does not look like it
I downloaded the two MTS videos and I saw the moire / color fringing. The nikon D3200 has some similar issues and I did a try with Neatvideo and I cleaned it. If this Sony fringing is just on color channels it can be cleaned with Neatvideo, but if it hurts the luma channel, the color fringing will be cleaned but the Y moire will remain. Interesting test to do.
Here is a video shot at Photokina at the Sony stand and the VG900 demo starts at 30:00.
curious to know the maximum iso for video. if this camera goes to 30db gain it will be iso 3200 like the vg20.
The moire is really bad on the pebble stones in the above original clips
Small review - http://www.videoaktiv.de/PraxisTechnik/CAMCORDER-Hintergrundinfo/Sony-NEX-VG900-erster-Test-und-Videoaufnahmen.html
But it has samples
http://www.aktiv-verlag.com/~webvideos/videos/2012/Sony_NEX_vg900/nex_vg900_Original1.MTS
http://www.aktiv-verlag.com/~webvideos/videos/2012/Sony_NEX_vg900/nex_vg900_Original2.MTS
Yes but too much air space between the FullFrame Mount and the Lens can result some issues no ?
Nope. By idea it must not cause any issues, as in SLRs same space is present. :-)
Yes but too much air space between the FullFrame Mount and the Lens can result some issues no ?
can cause mechanical vignetting ?
Yep, but for this they must have inside diameter much smaller than emount one, and this is not the case.
can cause mechanical vignetting ?
i don't thing he can have any real issues with such adapters. Plus they are cheap.
I don't think is a good idea to use the actual available PK-NEX adapter on the VG900, as you maybe know, the VG900 have a new E-mount to support full frame lens, you need to equip the VG900 of the Sony E-Mount adapter and put the PK-NEX adapter to the another Adapter... it would be more nice to wait a true E-mount FullFrame-PK adapter
14,2 stops of DR, that would be on par with the BMDCC :)
@Vitaliy_Kiselev I received the PK-NEX adapters for my K-mount lenses with and without aperture ring and pre-ordered the VG900 so maybe by late October or early November it will ship. Here is a photo of the two adapters on my small SMC Pentax-M 20mm F4 and 10-24mm Tamron.
It seems that new full frame sensor used in Nikon 600, Sony a99 and Sony Nex-Vg900, has 14,2 stops of DR. Source: http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Publications/DxOMark-Reviews/Nikon-D600-sets-high-bar-for-sensor-image-quality/Comparisons
That video @Tobsen posted suggests this camera will be another disappointment. Aside from being shaky and mostly out of focus, it looks to have bad aliasing issues, muddy compression, and severely limited dynamic range - apparently worse than the GH2.
In the above video it says there is in camera stabilizer? In the specs I can't find that. The A99 has it, but does anybody know, whether the sensor of the VG900 is stabilized?
@Tobsen Ok.. yes, it was shaky no doubt. :) Not surprised by DOF / focus issues. Imagine then in low light-conditions..
@RRRR according to the review they shot it all with the VG900 using the 24-70/2,8 ZA SSM a-mount and the E PZ 18-200 mm F3,5-6,3 OSS e-mount. He said that there was no stabilization available for the a-mount so it is very shaky without tripod. Also, focusing is supposed to be quite a problem for run and gun shooting since Dof is so shallow. Yeah, I thought it looked like shit as well.
Psssssh. Scarlet has less rolling shutter than c300.
@yoclay Judging from the C300, the C100 has rolling shutter. Far better than 5D, though, about the same as Scarlet.
None video showed until now deserve a FF sensor ;P
@Tobsen I haven´t got my normal internet connection, so I can´t see the whole thing.. was everything above shot with the vg900? Or are there snippets in there from it? (It looks a bit shit tbh, but it could be that the handling of the cam / footage is really bad?)
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!