BRASS 2.0 is a new kind of virtual instrument based on a physical modeling technology. It emulates a Trumpet, a Trombone and a Saxophone. All the characteristics of the real instruments have been analyzed and modeled through extensive research at world-renowned IRCAM institute http://www.arturia.com/evolution/en/products/brass/intro.html
Sorry @VK Logic is currently Apple only (Apple bought Emagic in what 2004-5?) Then they did what any company would do to protect business... kill off competition with rivals,... so it became mac only.
Logic - since being updated for the App Store has however slid in price again... now $200ish...
Sculpture is quite an amazing physical modeling thing... try it out if you get a chance.
Stuff like pianoteq is the beging of a new pyridine soft synths were physical molding starts to get good. Good as in real. They have been at it for the last couple of years. I am quite surprised that I have not seen anyone take advantage of CUDA cores.
NAMM is coming up I am sure there will be some new molding synths.
I have not checked out AAS for a long time they also made a cool software modular system called Tasman that all their products are is biased off of.
Kyma is also very interesting if you want the nuts and bults of modal synthesis, but its an expensive hardware option.
And the legendary Yamaha VL-1, Brass uses the same algorithm so its kind of funny that they are making it sound all new technology. Brass licensed the technology from yamaha.
Physical Molding has been a niche market for synths for a while, it sonds like a new technology but they have been hacking away at it for over a decade. It never really caught on in the marketplace that wants bigger sample libraries or the latest fad soft synth.
The guys that really used it too its full extent are the woodwind controller guys.
off-topic : These guys do some nonlinear behaviour modelling with CUDA based on Volterra series. They're the only company to use CUDA for audio, as far as i know. I like their concept, and their democratic approach. Audio latency is quite high though, which makes it less useable for tracking. For mixing this doesn't matter. http://www.acustica-audio.com/
I can tell you one core word - "tablets". With cheap and fast tablets whole synth market must be reorganized. Moving actual synths to the software and starting to make really good keyboards with really sturdy controls. Unfortunately, such words as "optimization" and "size" had been forgotten lately. So, we have bunch of huge libraries and CPU hungry synths.
@VK Lots of 'master' keyboards exist exactly for this. So really what has occurred is hardware companies make hardware only, and software developers do their thing. All connected together by USB/MIDI.
This is basically how I use my Technics P30... (With lots of logic synths... & Laptop) + various foot controls etc...
Chromaphone is fantastic! It does percussion amazingly well (esp. metallic stuff, but also good at skins and woods). Also some pretty nice plucked (guitars and basses) and even some big pads. I got it for 1/2 price with an educational discount, but if you want one of the other AAS plugins you can currently buy any 2 for $199.
re: CUDA and most video guys have never heard of audio ;p and as we hurtle towards AVID ditching Pro Tools and making it a shared prog with MC - scary lol WIth FCP rapidly and inexorably heading to history in the pro environment and AVID merging their video and audio products, I forsee a bit of a bunfight with editors with audio aspirations and dubbing mixers.
Not sample free, but the following all made waves within the scoring community through the use off variants of physical modeling technology. I think they qualify, feel free to remove if you disagree.
Also, not a piece of software, but the Roland V-Piano has its own form of physical modeling that is distinct from Pianoteq.
Incidentally, I was more impressed with the controller keyboard of the V-Piano (one of my favorites I've played to date) than the sound. I don't like the timbre of either the V-Piano or Pianoteq (at least not as of a version or two ago).
But timre is affected by too many parameters to be summed up in that fashion. If you want that level of detail, you could pay my usual audio consulting fees. Or catch me at NAMM between sessions and I'll do my best to give you the short version. :)
@thepalalias I would check out Pianoteq again... very nice sound! You do have to play with it though... also remember that if you are a piano player - you are used to hearing the worst sound (infront of the instrument)...
@almcomposer I'm sending a private message about why your concerns (though likely in many other situations) aren't the reason I responded the way I mentioned in this case. Didn't want to clutter the thread. :)