Vivo X300
Vivo X300 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
Oppo X9s
Oppo X9
Oppo X9 Pro
Oppo X9 Ultra
Xiaomi 16
Xiaomi 16 Pro
Xiaomi 16 Pro Max
Xiaomi 16 Ultra
Source: https://wx3.sinaimg.cn/large/7b4542d1gy1i561ghqiguj21dz0poq9y.jpg
Xiaomi name their phones after their electric cars - or do they name their electric cars after their phones ?...
:-))
Interesting observation. ;)
Xiaomi decided to skip the 16 series naming in favor for 17, most probably to align with Apple.
Both the Vivo X300 Pro and X300 have been launched.
https://www.gsmarena.com/vivo_x300_and_x300_pro_hands_on-review-2892.php
A clear example in which the Samsung Tetra²pixel Pattern is inferior to Quad Bayer not only noise, DR, color and tonality wise but also resolved details. The 200 MP are useless because they are grouped in 16 same color pixels which bring no benefit except high marketing number to brag about.
The X300 Pro main camera with a Sony LYT 828, 1/1,28" 50 MP Quad Bayer pattern sensor, and at 2x crop the image quality looks like: https://fdn.gsmarena.com/imgroot/reviews/25/vivo-x300-and-x300-pro/vivo-x300-pro/camera/gsmarena_202.jpg
The X300 main cameras has a Samsung HPB, 1/4" 200 MP Tetra²pixel Pattern sensor, and at 2x crop the image quality looks like: https://fdn.gsmarena.com/imgroot/reviews/25/vivo-x300-and-x300-pro/vivo-x300/camera/gsmarena_202.jpg
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!