35mm
http://www.photographyblog.com/previews/zeiss_loxia_35mm_f_2_biogon_t_photos/
50mm
http://www.photographyblog.com/previews/zeiss_loxia_50mm_f_2_planar_t_photos/
And I prefer my Minolta Rokkor 35mm 1.8 …
Anyone else think the bokeh is incredibly ugly on these lenses? The sharpness isn't spectacular either.
Not sure what the hype is about -- I'd prefer an adapted Nikon AI-s lens any day.
Graves of Nikon, Canon and Pentax. Shot on Sony A7r.
I've been reading up on these two lenses. The 50mm seems to fair better. I think it was Lloyd Chambers who said that the 35mm wasn't good enough until around F8 and even then the corners were not great (but I could be misquoting/misremebering).
On ebay
This lens is incredible. It’s more affordable than the 35mm f2 Loxia, has the Zeiss characteristics that we’ve come to know and love (for the most part) has a nice size in relation to the camera bodies, and just overall is tugging at our hearts.
http://www.thephoblographer.com/2015/03/11/review-zeiss-50mm-f2-loxia-sony-full-frame-e-mount/
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!