OK, continuing with the kitchen theme... ;)
Camera Settings:
1080p120 XAVC S 100M 1/250s (Shutter Priority) 70mm
Downloads:
Standard 3,0,0 - ISO 2000 http://1drv.ms/1HQkVfF
S-Log2 - ISO 2000 http://1drv.ms/1HQkWAs
Custom Profile - ISO 500 (-1.7EV) http://1drv.ms/1HQkXEu
I've used Standard 3,0,0 on my A6000 before for near perfect colors straight out of the camera (as long as WB is correct). With my custom profile, I messed with many of the newly available color and gamma settings to get a profile that looks close to S-Log2, without the imposed minimum ISO of 1600. Still some tweaking left, then I have to see how well it grades, but it looks acceptable for now.
Also, no other color settings are available when you use a Picture Profile, so DRO is out. Though the idea of S-Log2 is to map the sensor's entire usable dynamic range to the image, so DRO wouldn't be necessary anyway. In that respect, you could technically shoot photos in something similar to sRAW: an image with the entire dynamic range of the sensor, but baked in color. And yes, S-Log2 (and all other Picture Profile settings) works in photo mode, too, with ISO 1600 minimum.
BONUS!
4K24 100M S-Log2 cat vid!
http://1drv.ms/1CrsFEu
:3
@bluebomber Show me how well it fills and empties the dishwasher and and makes dinner.
some ungraded low light s-log 2 would be good to see, and if DRO can be used in s-log 2 it would be good to see DRO cranked up to 5 with s-log2 however if this is possible you probably need a lot more than low light.
@BlueBomberTurbo- wouldn't it be great to compare them both ...but if only one s-log2
@kurth S-Log2 or normal?
@BlueBomberturbo great !.....a xavc file at 1080/120p ...pleez and thanks
@kurth I've got one. What do you want me to record? ;) I've got a UHS-1 U3 card coming in this afternoon so I can use 100mbps (stupid card limitations).
oh shxt ! does that mean I have to actually read dpreview ? oh nooooo.....
well...I was almost right ! one 240fps sample !...and they choose a subject where it's not easily apparent to see the slowmotion because the real motion is not common .....like someone walking for example ! Stupid dpreview as always !
It is good idea to click on the links.
Camera in stock at http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00ZDWGM34/
Another high speed sample
Can or not record 480fps and 240 fps @ 1080?
Some samples
http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/reviewsamples/albums/sony-rx100-iv-real-world-samples
Another hands on
I've been eyeing the LX100 for some time....as well as the FZ1000. The slow-mo is certainly one of the differences, but for me....the ability to easily pocket the camera is the big difference. I'm not saying that the LX100 and FZ1000 aren't very impressive cams. I'm just saying that size has nothing to do with marketing and the ability to pocket a cam for some is important. Cheers peeps! :)
Interesting... if Sony manages to sell the RX100 MkIV for that currently asked higher price than Panasonic asks for the LX100 (which still has a much bigger sensor), then Kudos to Sony's sales department :-)
The SloMo abilities are sure a goodie, but the Seagull sample looks like lacking either dynamic range or correct exposure.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!