Personal View site logo
Veydra Cine lenses specifically designed for micro 4/3 mount!!
  • 69 Replies sorted by
  • The future for filming with m4/3 is looking bright! The number of interesting cameras with a m4/3 mount is many: JVC GY-LS300, Panasonic GH4 (and maybe one day an AF200 surely??), rumoured 4K Olympus camera, BMPCC, BMCC MFT, Axiom Beta, etc...

    No other mount system can boast such a wide range of support from many manufacturers! Makes a lot of sense to me why they'd make m4/3 cinema lenses.

  • Today M4/3, tomorrow the world! Hail Veydra!

  • @DouglasHorn Ok, I do agree with you on that. It would be great if they are at least a Canon mount and even better if they can use interchangeable mounts like some companies have offer. Micro4/3 is a bit strange for a first time but it may also be the relative cost of its glass compared to larger sensor lenses

  • Instructions for buying untested gear on Kickstarter

    You need to make it more general and we put it into some FAQ. :-)

  • @fotosiamo - I think you misunderstood my question. I understand the benefits of real cinema lenses compared to rehoused still lenses. It goes way beyond focus breathing. (Many cinema lenses breathe too.)

    So my question is: why bother making them for the m43 mount? You can mount any lens you want to an m43 camera with an adapter. (But you can't go the other way.) The world doesn't need a set of great cinema lenses that ONLY work for m43. There are plenty of great lenses available. Rent them when you need them along with an adapter.

  • Instructions for buying untested gear on Kickstarter:

    1. wait

    2. wait until the lenses are out

    3. wait until the lenses are tested

    4. read about service and warranty procedures

    5. compare the lenses, for example, compare the 12mm to the new Pro fixed zoom or 12mm prime

    6. Buy the best one, based on a comparison

  • They should be small since they are MFT, they're pretty fast at T2.2 and they have 10 blades. Proper built in gears, standardized sizing. I think they're going to be great.

  • @fotosiamo

    Yes, but CP.2s are for fullframe, and Cooke minis are for APSC/S35. If we're talking DOF-equivalent f-stop, these are slow. In a market where several companies offer small format manual prime lenses at f0.95, I'd think that at least f1.4 would be doable.

    There's a reason folks use focal reducers and still photography primes like Zeiss C/Y, Canon FD, Nikon AiS. Are they cinema? No. But some of them get awfully close.

    Just playing devils advocate a bit, no hard feelings.

  • Yes, precise focus marks because no adapters adding tolerances are involved would be the main reason for a native mount.

  • @douglashorn

    One of the big reasons is very minimal focus breathing w/ cinema lenses like this. This means that as you rack focus, the composition doesn't change. Just try it out with most still lenses out there. As you focus back and forth, there's a slight shift in the entire scene, which can be pretty noticeable.

    I believe even the Rokinons focus breath.

    Here are more reasons to choose cine lenses that have been designed from the ground up as cine lenses as opposed to still lenses adapted for video use:

    "Every cinema quality necessary detail has been brought to reality in these lenses including a smooth 300 degree focus range, constant T Stop, 9 blade iris for a round pleasing bokeh, high quality aluminum housings, plated brass mount for long term durability, 77mm filter threads for easy filter changes, and mattebox compatible 80mm front diameter for all lenses."

    I'd also add more extensive & consistent witness marks (the distance engraved on the lens) that are on the sides of the lens for focus pullers.

  • What is the advantage of creating cinema lenses for m43 when lenses for other mounts can easily be adapted? Personally, as much as I like the m43 format, I wouldn't buy expensive lenses in that format. Better to have lenses more versatile, I think.

  • T2.2? I'd expect good modern cinema primes to be faster, at least on a smaller sensor format.

  • I think it's a great idea and the price point puts them in the ballpark for a large group of GH4 shooters. I'll be interested to see more tests.

  • What's the reason making a decent m43 cine lens requires a kickstarter project?

    Look at this as marketing research.

  • What's the reason making a decent m43 cine lens requires a kickstarter project? Given the amount of existing lens manufacturers, what keeps them from making the same kind of lens?

  • Yes, totally! Matthew Duclos's involvement is a pretty big deal, to say the least. Dude works on everything from ARRI Master Primes to Angenieux Optimo zoom lenses.

    http://www.ducloslenses.com/

    His personal blog is pretty damn invaluable, too. So much knowledge:

    http://matthewduclos.wordpress.com/

  • Normally I'd probably not get too excited about this. But Matthew Duclos is involved with it! (Matthew Duclos runs the BEST blog on the internet about cinema lenses!)

    To quote from their Kickstarter page: "6). Matthew Duclos appeared in our video and was involved in the design specification for these lenses. Duclos lenses will offer these lenses for sale/service but is not involved in the manufacture of these lenses."

    So this would at least give me some confidence about the project being successful, though of course like any Kickstarter project it will carry substantial risks.

    But my budget level is still too constrained to get this on a whim. But I can imagine others would, given how very cheap they are going to be relative to other cinema level lenses