Personal View site logo
Make sure to join PV on Telegram or Facebook! Perfect to keep up with community on your smartphone.
Please, support PV!
It allows to keep PV going, with more focus towards AI, but keeping be one of the few truly independent places.
Nikon D7100 topic
  • image

    Nikon D7100 specsifications:

    • 24.1mp sensor
    • magnesium-alloy body, weather sealed
    • 6fps maximum shooting speed
    • no AA filter
    • 51 AF points, 15 cross
    • Same 2016-pixel RGB exposition sensor
    • 3.2" 1,229k dots LCD screen - only 640x 480xRGBW, very outdated
    • Dual SD card slots
    • EXPEED 3 LSI
    • ISO range 100-6400
    • 100% viewfinder coverage
    • 1080p @ 60i/50i/30/25/24fps, 720p@60p - not impressive
    • Mic input jack, headphone jack
    • HDMI Out - uncompressed 1080p output without an info overlay
    • Dimentions - 135mm x 106mm x 76 mm
    • Weight - 788g
    • MSRP - $1,200

    Previews:


    Available at:

  • 146 Replies sorted by
  • New firmware

    Fixed an issue that resulted in live view ending about 10 minutes after being started in Camera Control Pro 2 with [No limit] selected for Custom Setting c4 [Monitor off delay] > [Live view] in the [CUSTOM SETTING MENU].

    https://downloadcenter.nikonimglib.com/en/download/fw/455.html

  • Hello, I am new to this forum. I have been shooting video with the D7100 and recently purchased an Atoms Ninja 2 hoping to get a little better quality out of this meh camera. Does anyone else shoot with a similar setup? My question revolves around the image coming out of the camera and into the Ninja. it appears as though when I set the camera to 1080 @24fps the signal coming into the Ninja is at 1080 @30fps. Is there a setting that I am missing to get the proper frame rate signal into the ninja? I have another Ninja connected to a D810 and it is working as expected.

    Thanks. Michael

  • Hi! I have a problem with hot pixels when shooting video! Service centre said they cannot help me!

    First of all. I have no any problems when shooting photo. I met my problem shooting video, exactly when use ISO lower 1600. When use ISO 1600 and higher I have no problem, but if ISO 1250, 1000, 800, 640 I have some hot pixels on my video. When ISO 500 and lower they are not so bright, but doesn't gone at all. I have "Nikon D7100 Shooting image Inspection and Adjustment program", I run Image Adjusment 5, but it doesn't help, when I run Image Adjustment 6 it goes error, maybe I don't khow how to make Image Adjustment 6 correctly, because it requires some source of light and I don't know how to do it correctly, but it seem to me it doesn't help at all. In service center they said that it is imposible to resolve my promlem at all! I repeat: there are no problems with photo shooting, but on video I have following hot pixels.

    ingens.org.ua/files/Untitled-1.jpg

    The video semple

    @Vitaliy_Kiselev Paradoxally that they gone when iso 1600 and higher! Maybe it is possible to fix my problem doing some hack with firware? Is is possible?

  • New firmware - 1.03

    • Reduced noise (horizontal lines) in movies shot with 1280×720; 60p or 1280×720; 50p selected for Frame size/frame rate.
    • Fixed an issue that sometimes caused the display to darken when images were viewed by pressing the (playback) button.
    • Fixed an issue with the menus for some languages where continued scrolling would cause the camera to freeze.
    • Fixed issues with the virtual horizon displayed using the Viewfinder virtual horizon option.
    • Fixed an issue with the camera freezing when the Clean image sensor option was used.

    http://downloadcenter.nikonimglib.com/en/download/fw/154.html

  • @AlopexXx

    Better ask in PM next time. I do not have time now, hope it'll be later.

  • Will there be any updates of the NTool for the D7100 ? (Especially higher Bitrate?)

  • D7100 Firmware Update C 1.02

    • Support for distortion control data Ver. L: 2.000 and later has been added.

    https://nikoneurope-en.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/61867

  • Sorry,does anybody have service firmware for D7100? I have only english and japan im my menu(baught in Israel).

  • Yup, that's how Toshiba's sensor works. You need to crush the blacks in post or to use/make a style that is similar to the Standard.

    If you like to color grade your shots, download Kodak Elitechrome picture style - with proper white balance you can get really nice results with this pic style, plus you will get some additional space for grading. Or just play with Picture Control Utility and see what you can make. Just remember, the more contrast picture style you make, the less bending is going to appear. If you are guerilla style, stick to the Standard.

    Cheers!

  • Hi, in this days i used my new D7100 for some tests... good camera, good sharp, all good!

    But there is a problem!! :-O

    In the attached file you can see a test screenshoot (from a video frame) where in the underexposed areas (like the blue) there are some noise (but not much) and many lines, like small banding... this at 400 iso...

    why this? IT's a D7100 problmem? Anyone have this issue?

    test.jpg
    1481 x 818 - 165K
  • Video sample of D7100 capturing via HDMI to Hyperdeck shuttle:

  • I am definitely having banding issues in low light. Even in normal light with some dark areas too. Those areas have horrible banding\noise issues. I am so disappointed with this camera.

  • Like the D7000, the D7100 produced clean JPEG files with plenty of detail and a wider than average dynamic range. The default colour saturation for JPEG files in the review camera was higher than we usually find in enthusiast DSLRs, a fact that was confirmed by our Imatest tests. Interestingly, NEF.RAW files converted into TIFF format with Adobe Camera Raw showed the camera capable of restrained saturation and excellent colour accuracy.

    image

    The review camera exhibited outstanding performance at high sensitivity settings. Long exposures at night showed little noise right up to ISO 6400. The Hi 1 and Hi 2 settings were slightly noise-affected with exposures of a second or two. Interestingly the review camera produced flash shots with almost no discernible noise at both of these settings and noise was undetectable in flash shots right up to ISO 6400.

    image

    http://www.photoreview.com.au/reviews/dslr-cameras/advanced/nikon-d7100

    sales13.jpg
    596 x 398 - 91K
    sales12.jpg
    596 x 398 - 46K
  • Just shot this last weekend with my new D7100. I used the Flaat 11 patch. I will try other color profiles as well in the future.

  • So I was waiting for a Ninja and my D800 back to do a comparison for the Dynamic range. In the end I could not wait any-more because after sharpness this was the second most important thing for me. So I decided to conduct a little test this sunny afternoon. I shot this scene and measured my shutter speed to see fstop numbers. I used lpowell .4 gama and Samuel H flat 11, I also did a gamma correction to 6 in premier to get a flatter look a see how much I could go.

    Everyone can also download the 1080p images here https://plus.google.com/photos/11599...NDvxu3QnuqyjgE which without jpeg compression.

    So the first screen grab represent the scene in fstop. So at iso 100 f 5.6 the brightest part is at 1/4000 of a second and the darkest part is in the house at 1 second. I took those measurement with my Sekonic L758DR. I took two other measurement with one at 1/2 second and the other one 1/4 second. So if we round up the fstops in second it would be from 1, 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/30, 1/60, 1/125, 1/250, 1/500, 1/1000, 1/2000, 1/3000. So about 13 stop if we see that there is separation between the 1 and 1/2 second exposure. Is it too optimistic, should it be 12, that is my question.

    The second frame grab is the scene captures with Flaat 11 profile. Third frame grab is Flaat 11 again but I changed the gama to .6 in premiere to boost the shadows a little bit to see how much we could see in shadows. The forth frame grab is the image taken at Lpowell .4 gamma . Then I included the frame grab of each scene with wavefrom monitor, so as people can see the exposure in the link above. You can have video of the three images to judge for the noise. https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5jFCTM_caj5QmVYX1d0T1l5Z3c/edit

    fstop dr d7100 test.jpg
    2550 x 1434 - 467K
    Flaat 11.jpg
    1920 x 1080 - 781K
    Flaat gama 6.jpg
    1920 x 1080 - 830K
    gama .4 .jpg
    1920 x 1080 - 740K
  • Nice! Which one are they? I see a little difference, some halo artifacts but it's not awful like when sharpening the canons. How much sharpening did you add to match the gh2? I wanna know if i'm adding to much to my footage.

  • I tried to match them, in fact I worked on the Nikon one and so it might have degraded the image a bit. So don't look too mutch at the exposure or the latitude of the scene.