Personal View site logo
Make sure to join PV on Telegram or Facebook! Perfect to keep up with community on your smartphone.
Please, support PV!
It allows to keep PV going, with more focus towards AI, but keeping be one of the few truly independent places.
Finally Launched: the Adapteva so called "supercomputer"
  • Update: See latest post or

    http://www.zdnet.com/parallella-the-99-linux-supercomputer-7000014036/

    Semiconductor start-up Adapteva has launched a Kickstarter project with the aim of creating a 'supercomputer for everyone,' in the form of the Raspberry Pi-inspired Parallella board.

    Like the Raspberry Pi, which has been staggeringly successful since it launched despite a few hiccoughs along the way, the Parallella board packs an ARM processor onto a credit-card sized form-factor with a wodge of memory, general-purpose input-output capabilities, and various ports. Where the Parallella differs, however, is in its performance potential, with Adapteva claiming to achieve around 50GHz of CPU-equivalent general-purpose computing performance from its Epiphany co-processor.

    ...costing $99 for the 16-core version and a projected $199 for the 64-core version,...

    from http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2012/09/28/adapteva-parallella/1

    http://www.adapteva.com/

  • 43 Replies sorted by
  • from CNet, April 15, 2013.

    Summary: Move over Raspberry Pi, here comes Adapteva's Parallella, a low-cost parallel chip board for Linux supercomputing.

    see http://www.zdnet.com/parallella-the-99-linux-supercomputer-7000014036/

  • @kavadni

    Hope I got the Uni right. Would have to check browser history. On the road for 3 days with just my phone.

  • @goanna .. interestingly they have released their documentation.

    I didn't see where they say they are cooperating with MIT, can you provide a link?

  • An anti-scamming Police spokesman warned on Aussie TV last week that the most common victim of an investment scam is of a certain age, has made a few wise investments, but is under the illusion that he/she can investigate the viability of a company or investment proposition by doing a few internet searches.

    He went on to explain that it is easy for perpetrators to seed false, web-based material to passe off as credentials.

    Regarding Adapteva's credentials: When I'm doing a [paid] story I can usually substantiate or disprove the kind of vague claims we're reading here within three or four phone calls. I'd phone the head of that faculty at MIT which Adapteva says they're cooperating with. I might get a qualitative reply, referring specifically to the work they're doing - or I might find that this "cooperation" was just a free Power Point demo attended by a handful of students.

    In the former case, it would be like reading the CV of a competent job seeker who just doesn't know how to sell himself or realise that future employers will have to phone all his referees. In the latter case, you're dealing with a candidate who's just as naive but untrustworthy as well.

    Adapteva could be on the level. Or it could be a classic sting. I honestly cannot tell from web searching. And I should be able to. And that - alone, is cause to withdraw.

    Conclusion: Get more info. What is published is not enough for you to invest. If a company keeps using excuses such as "commercial confidentiality" for not showing their cards on the table, the wise position to take is that of disbelief.

    Adapteva, my cheque's in the mail. ;-)

  • @zcream

    I look forward to helping your project get off the ground!

    Design and Technology projects that are developing new hardware or products must show on their project pages a functional prototype — meaning a prototype that currently does the things a creator says it can do — and detailed information about their experience. Kickstarter Guidelines

    image

    from http://www.squidoo.com/backyard-space-projects

  • Makes me want to set up a project on kickstarter. Discover the Unified Field Theory. Or commercialize fusion based power. Start off with a few million. Hmmm!

  • As of today their Parallella KickStarter program has 1,720 Backers $231,316 pledged of $750,000 goal and 19 days to go.

  • They could run on Parallella out of the box thanks to the OpenCL support.

    I have big troubles with statement. As no one ever tested this "OpenCL compatibility". And all architecture is very bad suited for rendering (that requires acess to quite big amount of data).

  • Yay, looks like the luxrender boys are onboard .. comment from David Bucciarelli on the kickstarter page.

    --
    I'm one of the developer at (http://www.luxrender.net) and I'm very interested.

    We have also developed full OpenCL applications like SmallLuxGPU (http://www.youtube.com/watch…), LuxMark (http://www.luxrender.net/wiki/LuxMark), Sfera (http://www.youtube.com/watch…). They could run on Parallella out of the box thanks to the OpenCL support.

  • Here is their answer to the 'So Called SuperComputer' issue

    Why do you call the Parallella a supercomputer?

    The Parallella project is not a board, it's intended to be a long term computing project and community dedicated to advancing parallel computing. The current $99 board aren't considered supercomputers by 2012 standards, but a cluster of 10 Parallella boards would have been considered a supercomputer 10 years ago. Our goal is to put a bona-fida supercomputer in the hands of everyone as soon as possible but the first Parallella board is just the first step. Once we have a strong community in place, work will being on PCIe boards containing multiple 1024-core chips with 2048 GFLOPS of double precision performance per chip. At that point, there should be no question that the Parallella would qualify as a true supercomputing platform.

    They probably should put that right up the top

  • Hah, I am doing some reading and learning more about GPU vs CPU floating point precision than I really care to know. This things going to be a lot of fun .. however it turns out .. and teensy

  • Sorry its arquitecture that is right.

  • RISC is open standard.

    RISC is not standard at all. It is architecture.

  • Maybe the proper thing is too name it diferently. But its not my project. :D Make shure they dont call it ARM please, since ARM is based on RISC.

    RISC is open standard.

  • @Vitaliy_Kiselev

    ARM A9 here is external CPU, and this "accelerator" is just connected to it

    Yes, exactly. I think I was confused by your sentence "It is not ARM"

  • This is the only company i know was able to implment so so.. the ARM to big company...failed cos i remember in 2004.. 2003 they wanted to make a complete hardware via chip. Northbridge, southbridge, video, net, cache, and periphericals inside processors, so only mainboard was used to put sokets, since all was run out from prosessor. Like the solution AMD is doig now almost 10 years later.

    Funny thing about tech is it must happen in the right time for the proper implementation, and also PEOPLE must be aware of it and use it, if not its a failure.

    I have lots of examples from this kind of projects and they usually fail.

    Good old PASEMI.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P.A._Semi

  • @endotoxic

    Again, you are not right. And I am not stupid, so it is bad idea to make school course here.

    It has two A9 cores. But all other is custom thing totally non related to ARM.

  • @Vitality_Kiselev

    ARM : Advanced RISC Machine. They are RISC based, arm is a "complete" solution via hardware. Mainly they use their OS inside ROM from Special RAM as you said. They usually dont run complex OS like Mac or windows. Mainly uses Linux small distros for...lets say..Superkmarket money cashiers...Money expender in banks etc.

    So..lets put things simple.

    RISC is a prosessor architecture. Example..Was used in ALL machinotsh machines before intel era. The advantages of RISC arquitecture was it reduced instruction set. For example INTEL pentium prossesor used to had a pipeline were all prosesses where made of 34 steps. AMD original Athlon had on its counter part only 16 steps in the same x86 core, making it more efficient PER CLOCK. Thats why INTEL on that era was more prone to errors, since 36 steps por prosessing instruction and poor litography made too many mistakes, so reprosesing was shit, going back to cycle again.

    RISC processors are good, even today all ARM is based on that short instructions, BUT for todays mega complex software, they are more like not too good to use them, even if they have good litography, they also have more electric leaks when Nanometer prosses is smaller and smaller, since atoms "scape" from layer of copper and rare metals like indiun antimonite and shit like that.

    The only advantage of ARM as vitaly mentiones are its low power, and low requirements to function properly, but PLEASE dont belive super computers from this arquitecture since its not anymore the better one.

    I like RISC MORE than x86 since they are more efficient,but for today standars there should be a redesign in it, making it more programable, and less instruction fixed.

  • @kavadni

    Yep, you just mixing round and cold :-)

    Look at pictures at the links I provided. ARM A9 here is external CPU, and this "accelerator" is just connected to it.

  • @Vitaliy_Kiselev I am getting confused then.

    I read this on the kickstarter page:

    The following list shows the major components planned for the Parallella computer:
    Dual-core ARM A9 CPU
    Epiphany Multicore Accelerator (16 or 64 cores)

    My simplistic understanding, the Epiphany is the fp chip for the arm

  • @kavadni

    http://www.adapteva.com/products/silicon-devices/e16g301/
    http://www.adapteva.com/introduction/

    In no place they state that this is ARM cores (and it is impossiblle, btw).

    This is custom developed RISC cores suitable only for very thin number of tasks requiring floating point operations with very low memory requirements and very low power consumption requirements.

  • @Vitaliy_Kiselev

    They state that it uses an A9, the epiphany provides the Parallel Processing .. do you think that is a mistake or typo?

  • @CRFilms

    The "Supercomputers" you are referring to are render-farms. Very cheap and useful. Some companies in Sydney do outsourced mass-rendering for the film industry, particularly animation.

    You might have noticed the render-farm export option in Vegas and other NLE's.

  • I dunno - I'm just researching all this here - you seem to be hinting that this might all be an elaborate hoax.

    It is not hoax, it just just product with company that do ot have any good record, seems to be in desperate need of money and company that is offering very doubtful product to masses who really do not understand a heck.