NTool will be updated soon.
d7100 preferred :)
There is progress for the D5200?
Hello to everyone, I've been eye'ing a Nikon j1 online and thinking to pull the trigger on it, I'm used to Canon 60d with MagicLantern Firmware so of course the first thing I did was look at if the Nikon can be hacked and what it offers. I read online somewhere where there was a patch for the D5100 to get full (not cropped in) 1080i out of the HDMI port. Was wondering if it was available on the J1 version... Also wanted to see if there was a list or a thread for the J1 users, I've got a few questions about it i.e. is it possible to turn off OSD? If I plug in HDMI will the lcd turn off? Is it even possible to do hdmi passthrough? Anyways, I'd appreciate any help I can get. Thanks in advance.
Hi Vitaliy Kiselev. Will there be a hack for the Nikon D5200?
Best Regards
Hi Vitaliy! Any luck with d7100 hacks?
My Nikon V1 Outfit is for sale because of the lack of clean HDMI out to an external recorder. Is it even possible, or is it not worth the effort? The AFF is so much better than any other Nikon that I hope you try.
What was done in the GH2 Hack to allow actual continuous recording not limited by 4GB file size? Is that possible with Nikons? It looks like I will be getting an Atomos Shogun. $2000 is a lot just to get 1080 P60 unlimited. I am satisfied with the D5300 codec, the videos are great, even at 12,800 ISO. But I need unattended recording for 90 minutes.
Thanks for the reply. I have given up and thinking about the EOS M, can shoot 24p unhacked and raw with ML.. Seems to be one of the best bargains right now. Post processing with raw is very easy in Light works, best work flow I have found so far. :-) Thanks for all the resources over the years I had a GH1 and GH2 lots of info from this site.
I think no one is working on Nikon 1 for now. Camera seems to be pulled from US market and sales shrink fast.
Hi I am sorry to ask again or if it is a stupid question. Will there be any chance of getting more control over the Nikon 1 camera's shutter speed in movie mode? I mean will it ever be possible or is it going to take many years. I just wondered if anyone out there is making any progress towards that. I hate being stuck at 1/100 in pal mode here in the UK :-( .... Love the camera apart from the lack of control. If anyone has any idea about this I would really appreciate some advice thanks.
D5100 macroblock artifact comparison:stock 24Mbps versus hacked 54Mbps
I recently shot comparison tests of the D5100 in 1080p24 and 1080p30 video modes, using the stock 24Mbps bitrate, and hacked 36Mbps and 54Mbps bitrates. I took these shots with a Tamron 24-70mm f2.8 lens set at 70mm, f5.6, and ISO 100. The camera was locked down on a tripod and used the Neutral Picture Profile. I selected a sunlit scene of a running stream of water with highlights on the water ripples. This type of subject presents a myriad of high-contrast moving images that tax the motion tracking and bitrate allocation algorithms of the camera's H.264 video encoder.
In 1080p24 mode, the D5100 records in H.264 IPB format using 12-frame GOP. In 1080p30 mode, the D5100 records in an IP format using a 15-frame GOP. After loading the video files into a 32-bit Adobe After Effects project, I selected I, P, and B-frames from the second GOP in each video sample. I then displayed and cropped them at 200% magnification in side-by-side 24Mbps versus 54Mpbs comparison shots, and saved screenshots of each comparison.
I-frame Comparison @ 1080p24 (IPB 12-frame GOP):
P-frame Comparison @ 1080p24 (IBP 12-frame GOP):
B-frame Comparison @ 1080p24 (IBP 12-frame GOP):
I-frame Comparison @ 1080p30 (IP 15-frame GOP):
P-frame Comparison @ 1080p30 (IP 15-frame GOP):
H.264 encoders divide each video frame into horizontal and vertical rows of tiles called macroblocks. Sophisticated compression techniques are used to compress the encoded data within each macroblock, reusing image data from adjacent macroblocks and video frames. After the H.264 decoder reconstructs the encoded pixel data, it uses a built-in Deblocking Filter to blend the rectangular edges of the adjacent macroblocks together. With extremely detailed moving images, however, the encoder's image quality may deteriorate when it reaches the limits of its maximum bitrate. This can produce not only smeared image details, but undesireable macroblock artifacts as well, which can be seen in the sporadic rectangular edges in detailed areas of the decoded frame grabs.
Consumer-grade H.264 encoders are optimized to maximize data compression rather than image quality. They will typically encode highly compressed B-frames at lower image quality than the I and P-frames. This can be seen in the noticeably coarser macroblock artifacts in the 24p B-frame image recorded at the stock 24Mbps bitrate. However, the I and P-frames of both 24p and 30p videos are also contaminated with noticeable macroblock artifacts.
Frame grabs from the 54Mbps 24p and 30p videos show significantly fewer macroblock artifacts and finer image details than the 24Mbps videos. While the macroblock edges in the 54Mbps frames are fairly well blended, more seamless results could potentially be produced by hacking the encoder's Deblocking Filter coefficients. A more effective Deblocking Filter might also make it possible to achieve comparable image quality at bitrates lower than 54Mbps.
The need for all audio pro recording studios which work with video is to check if their audio with the video "in time"
The need for all audio pro recording studios which work with video is to check if their audio with the video "in time" They'll have to set up the equipment with specific delays to compensate the delay of the overscan lcd's and so on.
Can you describe issue in detail, in separate topic? As for me it seems to be best to use proper monitors with very small delay and not some strange high speed shooting.
Is it possible to have audio record also at the slow-motion modes 400 fps and 1200 fps (nikon 1 j1/v1) ?
The need for all audio pro recording studios which work with video is to check if their audio with the video "in time" They'll have to set up the equipment with specific delays to compensate the delay of the overscan lcd's and so on. A payable solution is to have an high speed video recording with sound then you can calibrate with this. The nikon is really high speed but unfortunately without sound for this topic now worthless. Here for illustration this Idea with an Phone app - but unfortunately this will be not really precise.
IPho5e-AppVideo: link.
Don't know why just when I pick firmware to my D7000 v104, Ntool2 v2.55 just show me Video time limit nothing more why? How to upgrade my Nikon?:)
Hello, Vitaliy! Is there any chance to get support for D7100?
Hi Vitaliy, I am looking for custom firmware and find this your page. Please I want to add support for firmware 1.02 on nikon d3100. released 2 weeks ago :) thank you, nice evening
I strongly doubt we'll be seeing 1080p60 for the D7100, as the NikonHack project is in relatively early stages when compared to what has been accomplished for say Canon or Panasonic cameras.
I can express it more strongly. Most this project is doing is waste of time and holding people from doing actual progress.
I strongly doubt we'll be seeing 1080p60 for the D7100, as the NikonHack project is in relatively early stages when compared to what has been accomplished for say Canon or Panasonic cameras.
Additionally the D5300 has the new Expeed 4 processing engine, something which none of the other Nikon DSLRs have. And I reckon it is the new Expeed 4 which is key to being able to handle the extra workload of 1080p60. So it is primarily a hardware limitation not a software limitation is my bet.
If you're looking for a DLSR/MILC for video than any one of a Nikon D5200/D5300/D7100 or Panasonic G6/GH3 is going to be a superbly good value camera. I wouldn't worry too much about what features that just maybe perhaps maybe they "might have in the future", and just pick one of those five based on what they can do right now. :-)
Vitaly, The D5300 has a few advantages over the D7100:
The only thing you can add via a firmware hack is the 1080p60 video option. I realize it's a lot to ask, but I really hope you can pull it off.
If the processor inside the D7100 is theoretically capable of recording 1080p at a high framerate and high bitrate, do you think it would be possible for you to implement such a feature in NTool?
I think you must buy camera that can do that you want without any hacks :-)
May be D5300 will do?
Hi Vitaly, I'm considering purchasing a D7100. However, it doesn't offer 1080p60 or 1080p50 video, which I really want (The new D5300 has 1080p60). If the processor inside the D7100 is theoretically capable of recording 1080p at a high framerate and high bitrate, do you think it would be possible for you to implement such a feature in NTool?
Thanks.
Hey Vitaly , why not two versions of your ntool , one for end users , one for advanced users .
Hey Vitaly , just for funny .
This tool is not for replacing your text and JPG. It is for ready end user patches.
Any reason you want to do it?
Hey Vitaliy , i tring to replace text and JPG in FirmWare with my own's ,
how to do that with your ntool ?
Hmm, D7100 is not supported for now, sorry.
I tried it too but i have same problem with Daggardj :( With D7000 fw is working well, but with D7100 newest FW and NTool 2.55 can't open bi file. The error was same: "Wrong file or trying to use Already patched file"
The D7100 fw file i downloaded from this Nikon site: https://support.nikonusa.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/18539
Vitaliy, you have an idea what could be the problem? Thx!
Hello, I tried using in NTOOL 2.55 with Nikon D7100 firmware, loading the firmware in NTOOL throws me an error "Wrong file or trying to use Already patched file". Firmware is the original Nikon product, what is the problem? -. Thank you.
If there going to be a hack for the D600 to improve on some stuff like 100% view etc in the near future?
Hi the real grievance I have with my Nikon V1 is the fact that I cannot change the shutter speed to anything I like. Its stuck at 1/60. Being able to get to 1/30 or 1/25 depending on framerate would make so much more sense and let so much more light in!
So does removing the video time limit mean I can record videos that are an unlimited length?
Nope. FAT file size limit remains.
So does removing the video time limit mean I can record videos that are an unlimited length?
I think nikon d5100 info button on top should be reconfigured to release mode button....it really annoying to change settings in menus....if someone can hack this feature
for the D800 (E) and all the cameras where there is written "only text patch", this thing is a proof-of-concept?
Yep.
so just to clarify: for the D800 (E) and all the cameras where there is written "only text patch", this thing is a proof-of-concept? can we help in some way for d800 and d5200 to get time removal and the other options already available for the other cameras?
It is already 100% with a Nikon firmware update if I am not mistaken.
Any update on a D600 hack for 100% view like the D800?
I actually have a new firmware not only increased the duration of the battery is not untied
Can you be more specific?
Plus third party batteries are all different, so one work and other can have issues.
I actually have a new firmware not only increased the duration of the battery is not untied would also like to Nikon D3200 zakruzhat their profiles color format ncp
Hey Vitaly. Is there any ETA on the D7100 I swear I will donate!
Nope. Again, I am not making reversing of D7100 for now.
And is there only a .exe I am working on a Mac??? Is there a workaround how to install the software? Thank you in advance!
Google WineBottler
Hey Vitaly. Is there any ETA on the D7100 I swear I will donate! This would be really wonderful! And is there only a .exe I am working on a Mac??? Is there a workaround how to install the software? Thank you in advance!
Is there a hack for D600 that remove the time limit, or automatically relaunch a video record as soon as one ends
Nope.
Any ETA on the 7100? Please and thank you!
I am not making D7100 full reversing (just some research), so have no idea.
When you say "garbage", do you mean poor quality or just very low quality?
They are garbage, not images at all.
One proposal for the D7000 which would be really cool: Auto-ISO on/off using the front scroll wheel. I think the D7100 got this feature, it would be very useful if someone could backport it to the D7000. Or maybe even a quick adjustment of the lowest desired shutter speed for Auto-ISO (this would kill two birds with one stone: Quick adjustment of minimum shutter speed and Auto-ISO on/off by using a extreme low shutter speed).
The same file reference is present in the D5100 and other models firmware also.
They are not fully same in all firmware images.
Nikon 1 models have many more different debug file references.
Also usually this is called within routine driven by one of debug flags.
Btw, D7100 seems to have many ARM references and of you check latest Fujitsu LSI use ARM cores.
They have the technology now - as usual they just don't want consumer cameras to effect their hi-end stuff.
I do not agree on both statements here. And we went offtopic anyway.
Yep. They have the technology now - as usual they just don't want consumer cameras to effect their hi-end stuff.
I like the 7100 otherwise - especially as the optical low-pass filter is removed and the sensor is highly regarded. It'll be good to see the progress on its raw capabilities even for small clips. :-)
I think with problem will be solved by major manufacturers soon :-) With the instant death of BM cameras niche.
Shame the D7100's major let down is its sd card write speed.
SD is most common card now. CF really went to niche, sometimes hard to get in distant places.
Interesting news about the LiveView Raw! :) I just registered on this forum due to that find. I'm myself a D800 owner and would be very interested in any kinds of video improvements on Nikon cameras. I'll keep following this thread. I'll be happy to contribute with donations as well. Cheers for working on the Nikons :)
Vitaliy, is there any plan to add the still photography options to the d5100 in the near future such as: -advanced backeting... bigger sets, move ev stop increments -timelapse capabilities... standard timelapse, bulb ramping, star trail timelapse
You better ask @Simeon . I just made NTool, not D5100 full reversing and D5100 patches.
downloaded the software but it says load firmware should i download the firmware separately for the patches to come please help.
Barely understand you. As for firmware, of course you must download it yourself from Nikon site.
D7100 has fun string present in firmware
A:\LvRaw%03d.raw
If someone do not understand, it means LiveView Raw.
Overall D7100 firmware is quite different to D7000. All menus seems to be image based now.
NTool 2.55 released
Version history
v2.55, 14 June 2013
Note that Nikon 1 bodies firmware update can not work if you already updated to same firmware.
We are working on this.
hello, I do not speak much English, but I have understood that the patch for the d7000 is out, congratulation for your work, I m going to talk about rush on french forums, but I have not understood what all this patch gives Now you can film a 25 second picture
in any case thank you for your work
OK, I'll look into this.
i have d800, is there coming something more than text patch?
Nope, for now.
But you could test it and let me know.
Nope, it is text patch that changes "Firmware version" text. Just for testing.
Normally if you click on patch you see tip window to the right.
Thank you providing something for the Nikon users :) I have a Nikon D600 so I downloaded the newest firmware and the only thing I see is the text patch. Does the text patch remove the 20 recording limit? There are no options or anything so I am not sure what this patch will do.
Best Regards,
Are there any plan to add support for Nikon D5200?
D5200 firmware is not awailable last time I checked.
Would e.g. be great if the main post indicated what the "simple text patch" actually is, and why it is indicated as experimental (what risk is involved in trying it?).
Click on it and read tip text.
Wow, great to see D600 on that list :) I downloaded the nTool and loaded the new D600 firmware, and I see the option for testers with the "simple text patch". I think there is still a need for more information, so we kan keep this thread as "on topic" as possible. Would e.g. be great if the main post indicated what the "simple text patch" actually is, and why it is indicated as experimental (what risk is involved in trying it?). I think there is a great deal of Nikon users interested in this, and also who want help testing. But most need a little more information, so we know the risk :) If timelimit removal will work as a stable patch on the D600, that would be so fantastic. Again, great work!!
Btw, I wrongly typed version history.
D600 is supported, just simple text patch for now.
As for limit, you can download tool and read tips after loading firmware, it has answers.
NTool 2.50a released
Version history
v2.50a
I would dearly love to see a patch for the J1 that enabled metering with a dumb adapter. In the J1, I finally have a camera that will let me mount this 16mm/0.78 I've had around forever, but the manual mode is just so badly implemented on the J1.
It seems like this is "just" bypassing the lens check, but I'm pretty far from an assembly coder. :)
Anyone working on the Nikon 1 cameras?
I don't know so much if it's a patch specifically for the D5200 - but perhaps some picture profile tweak.
@Vitaliy_Kiselev I read @LPowell to mean he had a D5100 patch in the works.
Guys, D5200 firmware still not available, so @LPowell meant somethign different.
@last_SHIFT I saw that too. Fingers crossed.
FYI - in the D5200 thread Lpowell hinted at a Nikon 'tweak' that he will put in beta soon. I have no idea what it is or when it will go public - but maybe we can badger him for more info.
The Nikon D5200 seems like it might be a viable camera for filmmaking. I am sure that Vitaliy is busy working on a GH3 hack right now, but might this be a worthwhile project in the future?
Again, just asking about the D7000. I'm planning to sell it and buy a GH2, however if there is a possibility for a bitrate hack, then I would love to stick with the larger sensor, and ergonomics that I'm fond of.
Like previous commenters, I would also be happy to pay or donate for the time invested in this hack. Please could you leave a comment on whether or not you're any closer to developing a bitrate hack for the D7000?
Thank you for your work so far.
@mjonas67
how about start to read this topic from the first post onwards?
Hey,
I have just bought the Nikon D3200. Does the hack for the D3100 work for this camera ?
Is the plugin downloadable there ? IDA PRO 6.3 is too expensive to afford.
Vitaliy,i have been looking for TOSHIBA TX19A plugin for IDA PRO , no result yet , your help is appreciate very much .
Hi ,Vitaliy_Kiselev , Does your Ntool support D800 FirmWare ? I hacked D5100 battery authentication several days ago ,D800 will be next one.
I really hope the D600 is going to be hacked
Interesting proposal from @jacdan regarding timelapse issue.
From my point of view, I'm very curious if the time limit removal will be possible for nikon D600. Are there any hopes for that? Is it possible to donate to make that easier to investigate?
I'm using my gh2 a lot, but vert glad there is some work going on with other brands aswell :) Thanks for all the efforts!
thank you Vitaliy_Kiselev and good luck
@octoberqueen No, the D5100's exposure settings haven't yet been hacked. But check out the third post in the thread below for a technique that enables you to manually set both aperture and shutter speed and lock them down for video recording:
http://www.personal-view.com./talks/discussion/1195/nikon-d5100-compared-to-panasonic-gh2/p1
Is it possible to hack Nikon D5100 firmware in any way to enable manual exposure settings in video recording?
Nope, it is not dead.
I'll update hacks as soon as I'll have time.
I'm with mikus, has the idea been crushed? I own a d7000 and half tempted to sell it. If it was to be hacked I may reconsider.
hello what about the hack of the nikon d7000 is dead ????
Read through all posts here and curious that there's no mention from anyone else and given Vitaliy's interest in post production, for changing the automatic bracketing from Nikon's consumer standard of 3 frames to their "pro" only standard of 9 frames. Can't shoot HDR lightprobes for VFX with only a bracket of 3 frames and changing it to 9 or like Canon's "pro" standard of a bracket of 15 seems like it should be a trivial hack to the firmware?
I'm hoping to find a way to enable shorter periods of time for the Monitor-Off Delay which automatically turns off Live View after a certain period of time. Currently, the shortest duration for the D800 is 5 minutes - Canons by comparison go down to 1 minute delays. Since its simply modifying a timer, I would imagine that if there are hacks available to firmware for the D800 this wouldn't be all that difficult. No real new feature or anything overly complex aside from creating/decrypting the firmware.
My reason for wanting this is that I have underwater housing built for a D300 which fits the D800 perfectly. I can turn video record on/off by changing the shutter release button function via custom settings menu, however I have no way of accessing live view on/off control. The Monitor Off Delay is a solution, aside from the fact that I have to wait 5 minutes (burn a ton of battery) for the live view to turn off. If I could lower the delay duration for the Monitor-Off delay, using the one button I have access to (shutter release) I could turn on live view, start record, stop record, then let live view turn off on its own.
Anyone have any ideas I would greatly appreciate it!
Vitaliy_Kiselev,
The D800 has a major disadvantage right now with time-lapse photography, as it generates flickering (aperture inconsistency). On Canon bodies, one can use a "lens twist" hack in order to lock the aperture. But there are no solutions on Nikon bodies. You can read more about these issues here: http://diglloyd.com/blog/2012/20120703_1-NikonD800-aperture-control.html
I am wondering though, would it be possible through a firmware hack to lock the aperture? Like a disengage mode? Meaning you set your camera to M, but the camera does not "reset" the aperture between each shot, but instead stays locked in.
That would be a huge improvement, and allow the D800 to be useful with time-lapse. Ironically it has excellent time-lapse functionality in the firmware, but the results are useless due to this flicker (change in light due to inconsistency in the aperture).
PS: You rock.
Hey All,
we use d7000's as our primary video camera (currently have 4). we are starting to do a lot of live streaming, and it would be simply amazing if we could ditch some of the text/symbol output from the hdmi output. I have already bought one d800, just for the hdmi out, but if we could figure out how to hack it, I would buy beers for everyone. otherwise I have to buy 3 more d800's ($$$!). What exactly do the 'text' patch do, is it this feature? chris.
Got it. Normally it is quite easy to do, just shoot raw and use good raw software with batch capability.
I mean the D5100 for example is able to take a photo in white&black and with one color. example : http://www.justourpictures.com/roses/imgs/4_barkarole_bwP0027.jpg
This effect is a little bit painful to do manually with a photo editor software.
By anychance do you know if it possible to get the selective color filter on D3100
What do you mean?
Hi all,
By anychance do you know if it possible to get the selective color filter on D3100 ? Would be so great...
Cheers,
I would. For the D800 the only useful hack other than than the time limit removal would be being able to record internally while still having a clean uncompressed 1080 HDMI output. Vitaliy would definitely need a D800 body for that one. Most of the limitations of the D800 are hardware based (8bit HDMI, etc) not software based.
@Brian202020 Yes, that's what I mean about the limited hack potential of Nikon DSLR's. I successfully used NTool on my D5100 to increase its max recording duration beyond 20 minutes, but that's about all that can currently be hacked. For such a limited improvement, I wouldn't risk hacking a $3000 D800.
Vitaliy already mentioned according to the recent D800 firmware the current Nikon hacks, like no recording limit, could be easily implemented. I wouldn't think a D800 body would be needed.
@Brian202020 - Perhaps not long after some generous reader donates a D800 to Vitaliy's cause?
The hackability of DSLR's (and the Panasonic AF100) is very likely limited by the hardware-assisted nature of their built-in AVCHD/H.264 encoders. Unlike Panasonic's G-series cameras, which use encoders implemented completely in firmware, other DSLR's typically rely on hardware-based encoders that may be configured to operate only at specific fixed bitrates.This is why the GH2's unhacked AVCHD software encoder cannot match the quality of Canon and Nikon H.264 encoders at low bitrates. However, that's also what makes the GH2 supremely hackable, and capable of delivering far more detailed video images than the encoders of other DSLR's.
When can we expect the new ntool with D800 support?
@matt1128 I'll have to check. I'll shoot a few full length clips tonight and check the frame count in FCP or Premiere. My guess is that you're correct though if there are differences in file size. These are my 2nd and 3rd bodies for shooting but It would be nice to get these bodies a little more useful and less scary to use while shooting weddings.
Anyone else have this problem or is this normal?
I think it is related to maximum file size - 4GB.
Hello everyone, I know that we should not write here, if nothing new has lead to the hack, but I come here every day, and I see that nothing happens, the Nikon D7000, and I find ca bad, because I feel that this device will n ever an update in 25 second picture, unlike canon which community develops new tools every day
and thank you to people who try to find the hack
Hi everybody. I'm a nikon addict and D7000 video user and i'm soooooo sad when i see the Magic Lantern for all Canon DSLR or Panasonic Gxy Vitaly Hack ... Why it's not possible to have same possibilities on Nikon DSLR ? Hardware or Software limitations ? Too small community of developers ? No money ? Not enough testers ?
My wishlist is : Higher bitrate, 60fps, On-screen audio meters, Manual gain control, Zebra stripes (video peaking), Control of focus and 100% zoom (like Sony Alpha XX with the Trash button on video mode).
I think it's important to create a big great community of Nikon Video User (Nikon was the first to lunch video on DSLR with D90), Professionnals and others and create something ... great (like MagicLantern website)
FYI - I've been shooting some initial real life footage with the D800/D800E and I realized that using DX crop mode during movie capture was a complete let down, at least with the built in encoder and also by looking at a broadcast monitor. It brings down the otherwise very good IQ level to an aliasing-fest dropping down below 720p detail and it doesn't help setting sharpness up/down in the camera profile either. Shooting with the D800E in FX mode was VERY sharp and detailed, I noticed no aliasing and moire is controlled in that sense you have to reach the point where subject detail matches the 36MP pixel array of the sensor, that'll give you some colour moire. I have to do some more shots and Nikon Nordic was interested and would pass this on "as they hadn't heard about this" yeah right... I work in a professional camera store and I do camera research on a rather technical level. I didn't find the D800E to be sharper than the GH2, rather slightly less IQ but DR is fantastic and the low light would be as well. Upon deciding for the D800 or the D800E I would definitely go for the E version, in any way. In stills mode it smokes. I'll try and gather some more findings later on, if I get time that is. Cheers from Sweden. :)
Are there any plans for more small hacks on the D7000 firmware? For example the one button zoom 100% as on the D300?
(I hope at least it is a small hack...)
The patch was a necessity because you can't buy a 3k camera which can lock up. The one waiting will also be happy to get a camera does not have those problems.
If the mosaic filter is good on the D800 it will have some advantage on even the hacked gh2. It has some very good dynamic range in video mode. At least 12 from Samuel H who designed the flaat profile. It could get to 12.7 but with some noise reduction. The rolling shutter seems much better also and the clean hdmi brings high bitrate and 4.2.2. In the end for best dslr video, it could be on one side the D800/mosaic/ninja vs hacked gh3 if it at least brings better DR and rolling shutter.
Both of firmware images use same encryption as other bodies.
So, I'll add simple patches for them to upcoming NTool v2.1
Nikon D800 firmware update B1.01
https://nikoneurope-en.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/52748
Nikon D4 firmware update 1.01
https://nikoneurope-en.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/52750
@tetakpatak and other
Guys, this is not topic of GH2 fans (or haters). Check the title.
@joesiv I agree with you- and that is exactly what I talk about. Just test all those cameras with the same lens and you will see yourself. GH1 and GH2 beat all Nikons in video features. It is not only about sharpness. Bigger sensors are great for stills, but not yet so good for 1080p video. GH2 is by the way also stunning performer for stills, but only if used in RAW and processed later.
I agree, there is much more then just sharpness. But, the GH2 offers much more then the other cameras do with regards to available built-in "tools" for capturing good video. So there is reason to build upon that potential. The D800 would be something if they could open it up as well...im sure, but its not exactly a camera available to the "masses". With that said, I'd love to see more "options" being made available for the previous line of Nikon cameras... The D7000/D5100 I think are amazing cameras, but subpar with regards to the video side. Bringing higher bit-rates, frame rates, and video options to these cameras would be more beneficial to many more people at the moment. At least until Nikon releases a new line of consumer DSLRs.
@tetakpatak, there is much more to motion pictures than just sharpness.
@audiores I don't understand the reason why D800 should be hacked? Its video features are maybe not so great, GH2 has probably better video quality than both D800 and 5DmkIII and it is obviously sharper. D800 or 5DmkII+III are great for stills, but GH1 and GH2 are great for HD video. Thanks Vitaliy!!!!!
Updated Dec 20: meanwhile I became owner of Nikon D800, tried recently its video capabilities and I must admit it has amazing performance. Needs no hack except for nasty time limit. It has wider DR than the GH2, performs as good in low light, just beware of too high ISO settings.
if we collect donations for a Nikon D800
I don't see where we collect donations for D800.
Otherwise, we do not use open source approaches.
@Vitaliy_Kiselev if we collect donations for a Nikon D800, would you guys find time to work on a basic patch? i am not asking for the full deal, but as there are some skilled programmers out there, i would love to see a basic start so other people can also invest brainpower and time to make a real nikon patch possible.
also, what do you think about putting the current efforts of github? it would make contributions much more easy, since we could fork and file a pull request if we have something new...
actually, using github would make sense for all the patches, their service is free of charge for opensource projects. http://github.com
To work around the size limit, is spanning possible?
Ideally it is possible, just requires rewrite of firmware parts, I think. I doubt that it'll be done.
I mean, from a hardware standpoint, there's nothing in the way of that?
It is not hardware issue.
Yep, hack works perfectly on the D7000. Recording is now limited by files size of somewhere around 3.5GB. Works out to 24 mins in 1080p HQ, more time as you reduce the quality/resolution - up to well over an hour. Camera will get quite hot on long recording, you may get an overheating warning but personally I haven't encountered one yet.
As far as I know many tried it. But I do not have Nikon bodies now, so did not tried myself.
bump.
Anyone?
Did anyone try this hack? I like to remove the video time restriction but I an hesitant to ruin my D7000.
@macmanar: you won't gain anything from uncompressed. See: http://blog.micahmedia.com/2011/06/24/bit-depth-part-2-of-3/
I was shocked to find that even the "lossy" compressed raw held no less information. Fact is that these sensors still put out less than 12bits of DR.
So please devs, unless it's a really easy switch to flip, extra raw settings should not be a priority, since they are pretty much useless. The default configuration in this regard captures all that the raw mode can and gives you the best buffer performance. Anything else is just unnecessarily slow and takes up more space on the card. It's a sales feature on the upper cameras, not a practical one.
Hello, I would be very glad If you will manage to change RAW(nef) d5100 to lossless, just like D7000 has. Its very importent when you trying to take a snap of sunset or another scenes which needs high dynamic range. Standart compressed RAW(nef) D5100 loses informations in highlights.
We'll see.
Hi, is there a chance of removing the "original battery" check in the firmware in D5100 etc. models ? We would be able then to use 3rd parity batteries and save us lots of money ;-) That would be great.
Nikon J1 V1 - 720p 120fps :-) Or even 100 fps.
Its already got an excellent 400fps 640x240
Is there any hope 25/24p for Nikon j1/v1?
Look at FAQ here (look at top menu links), just replace URL to download firmware from.
how about a step by step guide for how to use this hack? :)
When saving patched firmware, what are the rules for altering the file name?
Build in rules allow to change version part of the file name only.
You can try and play with it.
@Vitaliy_Kiselev Thanks for updating NTool to v2.0! When saving patched firmware, what are the rules for altering the file name?
This is starting to become an exciting thread.
i do not dare to.. i might be tempted to try something reckless with it :D
How about download firmware, NTool and look at the hints?
Otherwise most questions are quite strange.
i found this video limit patch for the d7000 what does "added support" mean? what is this video limit? recording time, or quality setting? is it already a working release, or just a preparation of the hack to support these patches as soon they are working? how likely is it to brick my cameras with it? and what are text patches? so many questions..
I made tool aimed at end users.
https://www.personal-view.com/gh1hack/ntool2.zip
Unlike previous tool, it uses full fledged PTool engine and easy to run on Mac also (using Wine or WineBottler).
Based on some work by Simeon.
Version history
v2.0a
@SWFree: I'm sorry, I lied--that wasn't my final word. ; )
To quote you "as soon the mirror is up, the aperture can not be changed anymore."
In the first part of the video, the aperture is changed while the mirror remains up. By taking a couple shots, live view is stopped and restarted, but the mirror is remaining in place while the aperture arm is starting at one setting and stopping at another. This is a software determined process and limitation.
The second part shows that the aperture arm is indeed moving around while the mirror is static, locked in the up position. Proof the mirror is up and the aperture is changed, contrary to your statement(s) above.
And to disprove that the motor is what's holding the mirror in place, try this: 1) Remove the lens/body cap of your camera to observe. 2) Enter live view. 3) Remove the battery. 4) Be astonished when the mirror doesn't drop. 5) Pop the battery back in and press the shutter button to get the mirror and aperture arm back in place so you don't break anything. 6) Remove foot from mouth.
Sure, you are probably right that they are moved by the same motor, but once up, a different solenoid or other mechanical component is holding the mirror, and the aperture arm is free to move however software tells it to, until live view is ended. The mirror is indeed raised by a motor, and returned by a spring, but for battery savings, there is a separate mechanical lock.
I don't doubt that such a change in behaviour would take a significant coding effort. But I stand by my assertion that it is at least mechanically possible.
Cheers. -Micah
you dont read my posts do you? or is it just hard to comprehend what you read? not sure if trollan....
aperture preview with the live view turned off works because the mirror drive isnt fully cycling, it only does one step forward, and back again. its more of a hack done by nikon engineers to add this feature and save money. as soon the mirror is locked up this wont work anymore because the motor has to hold actively the mirror in place. this is why you have to fully charge your cameras battery when you do a sensor cleaning, so the motor has enough juice to hold the springloaded mirror in place for the whole time
aperture preview does not work in live view because the mirror is locked up, and you need a full gear cycle of the mirror gear box to cock the aperture actuator again.
i even made you that video to demonstrate the aperture preview behavior without and with live view.
you just like to believe in wizardry, and that some hack would materialize a 300$ electromagnetic linear stepper motor in front of the mirror box, when theres even no room for one.
the d7000 is so densely packed , they just managed to cram the shutter curtain release drive,
and a mirror box motor into the body, other cameras mostly dont even have a dedicated shutter release motor, doing all of the operation with the mirror box drive.
the rest of the free space is occupied by the relatively big dedicated screwdriver motor and its gearbox to focus AF lenses,
and there is one more electromagnetic solenoid on top of the body, visible when you take off the top ,which is used to actuate the black hook to release the pop up flash.
here is a pic of the mirror/aperture actuation mechanism located on the right side of the mirror box.
the side facing right is the front.
;the blue arrow points at the central pivot mount, the whole mechanism rocks around that.
;the red circle marks the spot where the gearbox of the mirror drive motor hooks into, moving that lever forward and back again.
;the yellow arrow points at the mirror hinge spring, the hinge itself is surrounded by that chrome spring above, forming the brake assembly.
;the pink dot marks the contact point of the mirror to the yellow mirror pusher connected to the center pivot. the mirror pusher will only move if the gearbox coupling will move all the way. a quarter cycle will only actuate the aperture
;the green transparent bar is covering the aperture actuator lever pusher, not the lever itself, it is covered by the lens mount frame. the whole assembly is vertically covered by the mirror drive motor, with its gearbox at the bottom
there is nothing more to that. its a simple, reliable, compact and cheap mechanism, used by nikon since decades, even before digital cameras.
only d3´s , d4´s and the d800 got gifted by nikon with a relatively expensive electromagnetic high speed precision actuator and a redesigned mirrorbox which r&d costs are partly reflecting in the prices of these units
but since im throwing facts against your believes wall here, i see no point discussing this with you anymore.
...my final word on this, and the case that proves my point: aperture preview. ; D
Ever see the mirror more during aperture preview? No, because they aren't mechanically coupled. I understand why you think they are, because of their behaviour, they do generally act together. But that's like saying you can't have your left and right turn signals on, because the stalk only goes one way at a time. In fact, it's electronic and the hazard blinker will put them all on. But if you don't know about the hazard button, you probably imagine it can't be done. You just need to know how. That's what Simeon and company are doing right now. They're making good progress, and I (and I'm sure others) would appreciate keeping the confused speculation to a minimum.
(And for the record, I've taken apart plenty SLRs and DSLRs, and I know how the mechanism in Nikon's works, thank you very much.)
Yes, the new Nikons allow "smooth" aperture changes. By "smooth" them don't mean a continuous spectrum, they mean that they transition slowly and smoothly from one aperture to the next. In situation where lighting can't be controlled 100% (moving between indoor and outdoor light in the same cut) it can be very useful.
Cine lenses are purely mechanical aperture adjustment at the lens, but they have no click stops.
i guess its all about not having to turn off and turn back on live view. like having a real time preview of the changes. i haven't seen the necessity yet to be able to change the aperture electronically on the fly while filming, it just looks bad, cant imagine what it would be good for. i still say if you want to be serious about filming you buy non G , fully manual lenses.
you wont use auto focus while filming anyways.
changing aperture is easier.
and the build/image quality is mostly better.
Ok, leaving the technicals of can it be done or not, but...
why would you want to change aperture while filming? Or is all the debate over changing aperture between takes, and not wanting to have to flip in/out of live view?
dont worry, there is no bubble to burst.
you are using a manual aperture lens in that video, the actuator lever on the D7000 is spring loaded, alowing it to get pushed back when the aperture lever on the lens is pushing against it so the camera gearbox would not be damaged. it is locked in place, but connected to a spring alowing it to get out of the way when pushed by outside force. it cant move on its own once the mirror is locked up.
of course it is true that the cpu in the lens is transferring the information to the camera so it shows up on the screen or in the viewfinder, but that is just outgoing info from the lens,
this aperture data readout even works on manual aperture lenses without cpu. the D7000 has this little movable notch on the bayonet mount, just a little bit above the white dot you use to line up the bayonet when attaching a lens, which is pushed by the aperture ring on non cpu lenses when you twist it, telling the camera what aperture is set right now.
thats why you set your lens aperture to the smallest setting when attaching your lens or that notch would not be operated correctly when turning the aperture ring. the cpu in the lens, or the notch for non cpu lenses are PASSIVE read out instruments. it has nothing to do with the camera actually operating the aperture.
i am talking about G lenses without aperture ring, which have to be set by the front dial below the shutter. these lenses are using a slap aperture lever,which is operated by the camera, it has to be set and slapped by the mirror mechanism. take your D7000 apart and see for yourself, its connected to the same motor drive as the mirror. im not naysaying here, im just pointing out the facts.
grab yourself a G Lens, go to aperture priority mode in live view, because in manual it will do nothing at all with the aperture , and try to set the aperture in live view using the front dial, you will notice it does not change the aperture when you look into your lens , until you turn off and turn on live view again.
the reason for that ive stated in my previous post, you will see the exact same behavior, which is connected to the same reasons ive already posted, but let me explain it again, just for you.
nikon is using a mechanical lever for controlling the lens aperture diaphragm on G lenses, and manual aperture lenses with CPU which have a aperture lever. Canon and Olympus DSLRs and all mirrorless cameras use electrical contacts and in-lens motors for this.
the most simple and cheap implementation of the mechanical aperture lever is by a mechanical coupling with the mirror mechanism. live view is obtained in these cameras using the same sequence as when taking a picture. OK, the D3100, D7000 and D5100 have the means of keeping the mirror locked up during live view shooting, but the rest of the mechanics are working like during regular shooting.
you can see the aperture lever slap on the left side of the mount going up and down, operating the aperture with each gear cycle of the mirror
the sequence when entering live view is:
suppose now that you want to set a different aperture value to the one set before entering live view. you cannot vary the aperture during the taking of a picture with these cameras. the mechanical lever does not have a separate motor, it must wait for a new mirror & shutter gearing cycle. that means completing the cycle, i.e. closing the second shutter curtain and taking a shot, which is in fact almost the same thing as exiting and re-entering live view. you can see the aperture control lever moving only during these steps.
so, even if the mirror is kept up in LV, the aperture is behaving like during normal shooting, showing that the rest of the mechanical connections are well in place.
when taking a picture in LV the sequence is: 0. (mirror is already up, the aperture is already stopped down.) 1. shutter closes (second curtain travels down)
aperture opens all the way (like you have taken a shot and you need to look in the OVF between shots) - now the shutter is re-cocked
aperture closes back down. (now it will close at the value set previously when in LV)
the only Nikons that can vary the aperture in live view are the Nikon D3 family; the brand new D4 and D800. These more expensive cameras have a separate electromagnetic actuator for the mechanical lever.
on the D7000 this is not a software lock, it is a mechanical limitation.
I hate to burst your bubble, but: www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwDYKENnUis
In the video, I'm using the aperture ring on an AF35/2 lens. When custom setting F6/aperture ring is set to "off", the aperture can be adjusted with the aperture ring on a lens that has cpu. This works even during live view and video. On a lens with an aperture ring and no cpu, this is the default regardless of the setting.
The actuator (the 4.1 arm in Nikon tech parlance) may be software locked, but it is not hardware locked. This is an important distinction to make, since we are talking about software hacks here. So yes, it is very likely that aperture control during live view or video can be enabled with a hack.
In closing, thanks for all the hard work of the people who are attempting this hack, and please disregard the nay-sayers like swfree, who think it can't be done.
-Micah
There are tables the refer to the jpg's, not all are table driven. For the D5100:
JpgTableTypeA(0x054258, 0x054260);
JpgTableTypeA(0x055de4, 0x055EEC);
JpgTableTypeA(0x2A5898, 0x2A59F8);
JpgTableTypeA(0x2a66D8, 0x2A6770);
JpgTableTypeA(0x7c5a34, 0x7c6254);
JpgTableTypeB(0x38e7b0, 0x38e8d0);
JpgTableTypeC(0x38e8d0, 0x38E998);
JpgTableTypeD(0x392F90, 0x393320);
were:
JpgTableTypeA is 8 byte block, {pointer, length}
JpgTableTypeB is 12 byte block, {dummy, pointer, length}
JpgTableTypeC is 20 byte block, {dummy, pointer, length, dummy, dummy}
JpgTableTypeD is 16 byte block, {pointer, length, dummy, dummy}
And then there are some left over jpegs:
MakeJpeg(0x8A6B4B, 0x22FE);
MakeJpeg(0x8A8E49, 0x2661);
MakeJpeg(0x8AB4AA, 0x2C66);
MakeJpeg(0x8B0FD7, 0xE6C);
MakeJpeg(0x8B1E43, 0x1680);
MakeJpeg(0x8B34C3, 0x181C);
MakeJpeg(0x8B4CDF, 0xDB2);
MakeJpeg(0x8B5A91, 4280);
MakeJpeg(0x8BEAAD, 0xECB);
MakeJpeg(0x8BF978, 0x155F);
MakeJpeg(0x8C0ED7, 0xFEC);
MakeJpeg(0x8C1EC3, 0x1103);
MakeJpeg(0x8C2FC6, 0x10dE);
MakeJpeg(0x8C53FF, 5049);
MakeJpeg(0x8C8235, 0xCF4);
MakeJpeg(0x8E7930, 0xE44);
MakeJpeg(0x8E8774, 0x162E);
MakeJpeg(0x8E9DA2, 5801);
MakeJpeg(0x8EB44B, 3224);
MakeJpeg(0x8EC0E3, 0x122E);
MakeJpeg(0x8ED311, 4820);
MakeJpeg(0x8EE5E5, 0x12E7);
MakeJpeg(0x8EF8CC, 4451);
MakeJpeg(0x8F0A2F, 6335);
MakeJpeg(0x8F22EE, 4733);
MakeJpeg(0x8F356B, 0xE7D);
MakeJpeg(0x8F43E8, 6595 );
MakeJpeg(0x8F5DAB, 0x1E7C);
MakeJpeg(0x8F7C27, 0xFBC);
MakeJpeg(0x8F8BE3, 5284 );
MakeJpeg(0x8FFDD9, 0xF07);
MakeJpeg(0x900CE0, 0x16E0);
MakeJpeg(0x9023C0, 0x100C);
MakeJpeg(0x9033CC, 5772 );
MakeJpeg(0x904A58, 0x117F);
MakeJpeg(0x905BD7, 0xB8B);
MakeJpeg(0x906762, 0xC03);
MakeJpeg(0x907365, 0x1994);
The addresses are all memory space, not file space references
I'm just started digging into nikon's firmware, so it's 'a little bit of this, a little bit of that' - though I do have previous experience with embedded RE, so I know some tricks, but right now I'm just working out some very basic "vectors of development", so to say.
How about sharing your info here?
you're storing into JPEG 1 extra byte at the very end of the file that does not belong there.
And? Right now tool is suitable for viewing only, so this small bug does not cause any problems.
@Vitaliy_Kiselev, Directory inside do exist (in fact, there's a lot of them), and btw you're storing into JPEG 1 extra byte at the very end of the file that does not belong there.
It uses special algorithm for extracting JPEG files. No directory inside exist.
Vitaly, I have a question regarding your ntool.exe: How exactly do you find all those JPEG files? Simply by searching for JPEG signature, like "FF D8 FF E0 00 10 4A 46 49 46 00" ? Or you happened to find some kind of a "master directory" inside firmware? I've found some, but it does not contains all the JPEGs that are inside..
Dear Nikonian friends. I have tried in vain to find the D200_IMAGE_ADJ_01_25_06 (or newer) software and needs it really bad to refrech my old D200 from tuck pixels. Is there anyone here that actually got hold of the file and care to share it with me? I would be very grateful and happy if someone could help me with this! Please respond to marc.de.legion(at)gmail.com Best regards from a fellow Nikonian in Norway. /// Marc
you are wrong again.
the D800 is mechanically a complete different camera. they built it with a dedicated aperture drive motor.
on the D7000, the aperture wheel in live view mode does NOT control the aperture in real time, it is just changing the aperture value on the screen which has to be enabled by turning the live view off so the mirror comes down, and turning live view back on, so the mirror mechanism will CHANGE and hold the aperture in position you have set in live view. as soon the mirror is up, the aperture can not be changed anymore.
only the value on the live view screen is changing.
not the actual aperture.
you have to disable and enable the live view to use the set aperture
also , aperture preview does only work when live view is not enabled. means the mirror has to be down for it to work. the aperture is set by the mirror mechanism as first step before the mirror even moves. the aperture preview stops right there, before it even actuates the mirror.
the d7000 has 3 motors, 2 motors in the shutter mechanism, one for the mirror mechanism and aperture, one for the shutter curtain only. and a slow, quite noisy AF motor that is used to drive the focus on on older lenses without AF motor.
i took a broken d7000 apart, and be assured, there is mechanically no way that the aperture could be changed dynamically in live view. you would need a complete different mechanism or in this case the new D800 which was made with video in mind, and being able to set aperture in live view
@Georgester - nothing yet for the D5100, the tool is at this point only for experimentation.
Sorry for my question, but I have Nikon d5100 and what can this tool add into functions of my camera,заранее спасибо.
@swfree, about the aperture arm: not true that they are hard interconnected mechanically. see: aperture preview.
New D800 has "stepless" smooth aperture adjustment. It doesn't appear to be truly stepless, but it does change smoothly. Even the ability to change not smoothly would be an improvement.
Oh, and as further proof that the mechanisms aren't connected, you can adjust aperture with lenses with aperture rings that lack cpus on the D7000 during video. This means that the aperture arm has the ability to move around, even when the mirror is up. (it has to move to allow the aperture pin on the lens to move)
How long will it take for a hack?
We are hunting for small clues, in our spare time, for the fun of it. As far as I can tell Vitaliy has his hands full on the GHx work.
Why is it not being doing here?
This site seems very focused around the good work being done on the GHx hacks. We didn't want to distract from that, or have the established community questioning the progress, when we are much further behind in the understanding curve, of how our firmware works.
I really like Stuge's post above, we are not lacking it idea's that we can't already do. Once we have cracked open the Rubik cube, and start getting some win's then we can talk about what other people would like. But honestly, until that point in time, I couldn't give a hoot what other would like done. Help sure, and by help I don't mean ask how you can help. Just out right help or don't help.
So yes, 2-3 years sounds about what to expect. Aka, buy the camera you want to do what you want now, and if somebody works out how to give you more for free at some time in the future, then that's awesome, but base your actions on what is currently available, as there is no promise that anything will be done.
2 maybe 3 more years. i say check back 2015, or try to learn writing your own firmware. nikon firmware has clearly no priority right now, and i guess it could get quite expensive. when you write custom firmware, you gonna brick several cameras in the progress from trying to get just the basics to work.
maybe you could donate a camera or two
my comment is not abount naggin but to have the idea of timeframe. So I wondered if anyone had any clue as to how long it may take for thing to happen.Otherwise I can buy another camera with 60fps.
@osmar92 When you create it.
To everyone who is posting comments asking for things they want:
Please consider that you are only creating noise on the internet, and you make it more difficult for people who are actually competent to collaborate to do so. If you can not be constructive at this time, then please just wait until there is some announcement.
Don't worry, if you are interested in something and you keep an eye on the relevant sites then you will not miss it if and when it happens. Please spend your time meanwhile doing something productive instead of nagging for your most desired feature.
Many thanks!
Personally, I will look at how to up the video length limit on my D3100, because it's a silly arbitrary limitation, and because it makes it impossible to use the camera e.g. for recording a conference presentation, lecture or any stage event, which it would otherwise be able to do just fine in many conditions. Like anyone else who is halfway competent I don't have free time for this at all, so it can take a long time and it may never get done at all. See above. Get excited when something is finished, get working on your own until such time. If you can't help, then simply wait. It is really irrelevant how many millions of people are unhappy with the products they have bought. If they can organize they need to take it up with the producer, not with individuals doing technology research for fun.
Many thanks to Simeon, Vitaliy and others who share their work.
Any idea when we will get a hold of 60fps in d5100 or any hack for that matter?
rename nef to raw, problem solved
Shame you're too busy.
I'm looking for a longer Exposure Delay (currently 1-2s) and introduction of "proper" RAW. Rather than the bastardised Nikon NEF format. :)
Personally, I am too busy now with Panasonic cameras.
Any updates?
Lpowell, this is true, nikon took its time, even though ive never really needed a feature like that because im using manual lenses with aperture ring on the d7000 like the quite awesome fully manual Rokinon/Samyang/Walimex Pro AE 35 mm 1:1,4 http://www.amazon.com/Rokinon-Angle-Nikon-Automatic-RK35MAF-N/dp/B004X1SFTA/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1326481509&sr=8-1 i say if you want live view aperture control , the chances that you are a dslr film maker are good, so you dont really need auto focus, but a nice, smooth and long manual focus for your follow focus setup. just get manual lenses
@el_guero In Aperture Priority Live View mode on the Nikon D7000 and D5100, you can turn the dial and the aperture setting on the LCD will change. However, the lens aperture will not actually be changed until you leave Live View mode or snap a photo. This is a long-known pitfall of Nikon's Live View mode and it's good to hear that it has finally been fixed with the D4.
@swfree I really don't think that's a physical limitation because while on aperture priority mode, on live view you can record video and also change the aperture value, if it was in did a physical limitation as you suggest that wouldn't be possible at all.
@mikus : check your pm for the explanation of an hack process, in french.
What There is no hope of, c is really a shame to condemn him
mikus, no hack.
hack is possibly possible, but uncertain if entirely doable.
check again next year :p
ok I read every post, but I don not come to understand or are the D7000's hack, and especially if there are already what is new in the video function
thanks
@ Micah: the mechanical limitation is how the aperture arm is operated, on the d7000 it is using the same motor used for the mirror up/lock function. thats why you have to disable and re enable live view , to get the mirror down, so on the way up the new aperture setting takes effect, they did not do the same for the D4, the D4 is not the D7000, it has a dedicated aperture drive not connected to the mirror. its nothing you could fix with the software.
@swfree: this is not a mechanical limitation. The new D4 has the same mechanical aperture arm actuator and works fine with video (or at least during live view, which if unlockable would still be an improvement!)
by neogene "My only missing for d7000 is the lack of ability to change aperture during video recording"
sadly this is mechanically not possible due to how the d7000 aperture operating mechanism is constructed, it is not a firmware fixable thing, you better get some manual aperture lenses, or get a manual aperture ring
to me please
Hi !
I just wanted to know what are the current progresses on the D7000 hack. Is there any news ? Thanks for the work you've done so far.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!