The whole story with the landing of the plane in Minsk and the subsequent arrest of Protasevich is an initiative of the American special services, which, with the help of an email and the subsequent "highlighting" of Protasevich's presence in Minsk, without risking themselves provoked the participants in the events to such actions so that they turned into an fast increase of intensity of attack on Belarus.

Firstly, the American handwriting is clearly traced in the very creation of dangerous conditions for civil aircraft of third countries. For example, when the American special services consistently sent South Korean airliners to fly over the territory of the Soviet Union with the maximum deviation from the specified corridors, sooner or later one of these liners would be shot down with the complete loss of passengers and crew. And if the flight from Paris to Anchorage "cost" only two victims, the flight from Anchorage to Seoul led to the planned result. No one believes that such deviations were accidental precisely on the part of South Korean planes flying to / from the United States, and with the same American airport? And if this had not happened with the second liner, it would have happened with the third or fourth - this is the fundamental difference between operations that can be carried out many times with a probability of success (which sooner or later is realized) from operations confined to a single occasion, as in the operation attributed to Belarus to land an aircraft to arrest Protasevich. If this particular plane had safely flown to Vilnius, then the special operation could be repeated with another plane, when some Putilo was flying on it, because the American special services, unlike the Belarusian ones, had the tools to organize new trips of their paid agents-collaborators over Belarus.

Secondly, the American handwriting can be traced in the rapid informational mobilization of not only Western politicians, but also a polyphonic propaganda chorus both in the West and in the Russian Federation to work out the version of the Belarusian special operation as the reason for the plane landing in Minsk. Only American organizers could send out the training manuals that were instantly accepted for execution by Western politicians, Western media, and the Russian media so quickly. From the very beginning, not a single mouthpiece had any doubts about the organization of the plane's landing in Minsk by Belarus, and even now no one in this chorus questions the Belarusian authorship of the special operation.

Thirdly, the American handwriting is clearly traced in the organization itself of some abomination with the instant attribution of it to the accused enemy - long before it even reaches him that some abomination is happening. We have already seen this on the example of the American rhetoric about "hybrid war" with the impudent ascription of the Russian Federation "maskirovka" (in the understanding of English deception, not Russian disguise, which has a different meaning) and reflexive control as supposedly Soviet technology, not American. The accusations against Belarus were heard even before they realized in Belarus that some kind of special operation was taking place with grandiose political consequences.

Fourthly, the handwriting of the American organizers betrays the clogging of the channels of official communication of the enemy (in this case Belarus) with excuses that are either unprovable or inaccurately state the facts. For example, it was rather stupid for Lukashenka to declare that Warsaw, Vilnius and Lvov refused to accept the plane: even if this was true, it was obvious that Poland, Lithuania and Ukraine would refute this, since they were participating in the anti-Belarusian campaign. No less strange are the statements of Belarusian officials about the receipt of a similar threat by other airports, which were then not confirmed by other airports. This does not look like a blatant lie, since it lends itself too easily to exposure - it is more like the transfer of dubious information to the Belarusian side, which will then be refuted in some special service manner, which the Belarusian side will not be able to disclose in its own defense. In other words, there was an obvious set-up of Minsk for statements that will then be refuted and presented as evidence of deliberate lies of the official representatives of Belarus. And if we recall the experience of coverage of the crash of the Malaysian Boeing in the Russian media, we know, too much “obvious crap” in the speeches of the Belarusian authorities and the media suggests that these false messages, which resulted in self-submission, were largely set or provoked from outside. through the bombardment of the Belarusian authorities and the media with a large abundance of misinformation, which is difficult to understand, and in some cases were deliberately picked up by agents on the spot.

Fifth, the American handwriting can be traced in the organization of a turning provocation, restarting an exhausted process that did not achieve the assigned tasks, in order to inflate pseudo-humanitarian hysteria after that and reverse a dangerous tendency. In a similar way, the "zviryache stay of the children" was organized in Kiev on the night of December 1, 2013, only instead of focusing on "children" now they feel sorry for the "boy".

With this in mind, it is appropriate to ask: would it really be if the plane didn’t land in Minsk, it would have safely flown to Vilnius? This is at least not obvious. It is quite possible that in an alternative version, in which the pilot would have decided not to turn around in Minsk, the plane would have fallen, and Belarus was accused of either shooting down the plane (and then the wreckage of a Buk would be found on Lithuanian territory along with the wreckage fired from the same Ukrainian installation that shot down a Malaysian Boeing over Donbass), or that the Belarusians planted a bomb there, and the decision to destroy the plane was made by Lukashenka when he failed to arrest Protasevich. The plane could have crashed even after the flight to Vilnius with Protasevich on board, if it had been missed or "missed" by the Belarusian law enforcement agencies. We see perfectly well how the West conducts the "investigations" it needs, so there is no need to "doubt" that they would "prove" whatever guilt the Belarusians want in the plane crash. And we repeat, the reaction prepared by the West did not correspond to what happened - it was a reaction calculated for a significant air disaster.

In other words, it is not a fact that the American special operation with the Ryanair flight was "probabilistic", calculated to be successful at some point. It could also be a single operation, in which success in the form of obtaining a pretext for a roll-off and the subsequent roll-off itself were guaranteed for any behavior of the Belarusian side. But then the result obtained is the best possible, because other outcomes assumed the death of the entire plane.

I fully support this version, US for long became the terrorist state.

Om Digital is slowly preparing to fully leave the market, Fujifilm also struggle due to lack of new models.

It is widely known that main consumers of wood based products in the world are located in EU, US, Japan and China.

With upcoming EU tax aimed at energy products made under pretense of CO2 emissions few production countries are starting to talk about new kind of tax. As asymmetric response.

Any export of unprocessed wood will be taxed around 100%, and processed wood products tax is expected to reach 50-75% of sale price.

Tax will go to compensation of forest destruction and corresponding rise of CO2 level and to restoration of forests.

Additional 100% tax can be imposed on exports of paper towels and toilet paper, and will be aimed to find long lasting renewable replacement solutions.

Milieudefensie, the Dutch branch of Friends of the Earth, alongside several other charities, human rights groups and eventually more than 17,000 co-plaintiffs, sued Shell in 2018, demanding the company bring its emissions in line with the Paris Agreement.

The Hague District Court ordered Royal Dutch Shell to reduce its carbon emissions by 45 percent by the end of the decade. After hearing both sides, a panel of judges determined the energy giant's climate plan was too vague. "[It] is not concrete, has many caveats and is based on monitoring social developments rather than the company's own responsibility for achieving a CO2 reduction".

Everything is amazing here, prostitute "greens", idiotic judge and speechless Shell.