Personal View site logo
Panasonic AG-AF100A topic
  • 44 Replies sorted by
  • svartsvart

    Nah, just because it's software doesn't mean it's simple. Even then, there is tons of PV and testing to be done on the software, and then again on the system to make sure it's rock solid. Nobody wants to send out a software update and get a bunch of bricked units back into service. Either that or they suddenly discovered that it could be done, or had to rewrite the software to re-allocate resources or who knows. The large corporation train moves very slowly.

  • Brian202020Brian202020

    I know nothing about FPGA or DSP or IC. I do know if the original AF100 could, through firmware, make the SDI 10 bit, they would have done it for free, or a paid update, or a AF100A as soon as they realized they were losing customers to the competition. There is no logic to waiting so long to releasing a software update. Logic says since it took this long it has some updated hardware of some kind.

  • svartsvart

    @Brian202020 That's not necessarily true that you'd need a hardware change to go from 8 bit to 10 bit. It depends on what is generating the signal. If it's an FPGA or DSP/processor then it could be as simple as a new program. If it's an hardware conversion ASIC that generates the signal then, yes, it could be hardware limited but I seriously doubt it. I'd bet that it's DSP generated and then buffered through a dumb driver IC. That's the most sensible route. As for the hearsay from some source that says they heard from Panasonic that they can't do something because of a hardware limitation.. I design electronics and I use that excuse all the time to keep people from requesting features.. :)

  • Brian202020Brian202020

    @svart

    Like @jasketti said, there is at least a minor hardware change going from 8bit to 10bit output.

    @sam_strickland.

    The DVX100A and DVX100B have a 16x9 "capable" chip. The original DVX100 needed an anamorphic adapter to get a 16x9 image.

    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/282865-REG/Panasonic_AG_LA7200G_AG_LA7200_Anamorphic_Lens_Adapter.html

    http://www.adamwilt.com/24p/index.html#DVX100A

  • JaskettiJasketti

    I guess there has to be some hardware change too as it is said that AF100 could not output 10bit (not even with an impossible to do hack).

  • sam_sticklandsam_stickland

    @Brian202020 I've got a DVX100B and it' still got a 4:3 sensor, unless there's some trick I've been missing this whole time!

  • svartsvart

    I don't think there is any way they put a new sensor into a product that barely sells.. Sensors cost millions of $$ to develop and fab. I would wager that they haven't even broken even with the costs of the original design. I think this is just a firmware update and a new model #. This is done all the time in the product design world. Just give it an update and a new model # and try to get more sales on the same hardware.

  • RRRRRRRR

    It´s a bit like the saying about beating a dead horse. Obviously, if they price it radically differently to before they might have an incentive for someone to bother.

  • Brian202020Brian202020

    Agreed

  • truestorytruestory

    I have been waiting for Panasonic to announce a new AF100 series with AVC intra 100mbps422 with internal recording at the least. The M43 is a fabulous format and panasonic has failed dismally in promoting to higher end productions. Along comes BMCC with 10 bit 422 prores, 12 bit raw and is about to clean up around the world and what does Panasonic do, bring out a shitty update requiring an external recorder to get a 10 bit codec. Sony has obviously got the message at boardroom level and are responding accordingly with F5/F55 etc. If panasonic wants to remain in this market they need to offer something a little bit more substantial than this..

  • Brian202020Brian202020

    Not true. Like I said, the DVX100 and HVX200 have sensor changes with just "A" or "B" model increments.

  • paglezpaglez

    'The sensor might be on par with the GH3'

    If so, its name would'nt be AG-AF 100 A, but other different. (marketing strategy)

  • Brian202020Brian202020

    @paglez

    Not sure if there is a sensor change between the two. For the DVX100 line there was a sensor change between a 4x3 sensor to a 16x9 sensor in the DVX100A, and with the HVX200 line there was a small sensor change in the HVX200A as well bringing from a noisy ISO 320 to a clean ISO 500. I'd venture there is a small sensor change in the AF100 also, but I'm not sure what the benefits are. The sensor might be on par with the GH3.

  • paglezpaglez

    No news about new sensor, ergo same sensor than original AG-AF 100

  • RRRRRRRR

    Well, this should be competetively priced overall.. As it seems under-specced and all it could be an interesting option at 2kUSD, body only (imo).

    It wouldn´t surprise me if they use the gh2 sensor though. :) The information tells us that external recording can be done.. and this tells me that there is reason to doubt the relevance of this product.

  • John_FarragutJohn_Farragut

    Also, I hope more competitively priced compared to FS100?

  • John_FarragutJohn_Farragut

    Interesting. Why does GH3 get 50Mbps codec, and the AG-AF100A not? Or maybe specs are incomplete.

  • lolodigitallolodigital

    which same sensor ? GH3 sensor ? GH2-AF100 sensor ?

    GH3 sensor could be a good news about the HDMI out color space which could be hacked to 422 ...

  • paglezpaglez

    Good news ,BUT the same sensor, same poor DR, etc...

Add a Comment