I've linked this video in the Flow Motion v2 thread. @Vitaliy_Kiselev, please close this duplicate thread.
I have both of these cameras. I was going to do a test setting up a f100 footage from my samari box and a hacked gh2. I figure the 4:2:2 8 bit prores HD signal should resolve better then the GH2's 4:2:0 hacked 150ish signal? Of course the AF100 has lots video control and the audio options are better. If someone where to hack the AF100 that would be great. Although I'm already getting prores HQ bitrates out of it (180-220)
. I was going to do a test setting up a f100 footage from my samari box and a hacked gh2. I figure the 4:2:2 8 bit prores HD signal should resolve better then the GH2's 4:2:0 hacked 150ish signal?
Please do it! This is one shootout, maybe the only one, I'd like to see. Does the 422 from the AF100 come from HDMI or SDI?
AF100 is muddy, and looks so badly baked in! Anything more than minimal grading on that would tear it apart. I'd like to see a comparison of the flattest ungraded footage you can get with a AF100 linked to a 4:2:2 recorder, compared to the flattest ungraded footage you can get on a GH2 with Sedna A or CM Night.
This thread is redundant, the active discussion is here:
I've also uploaded much better AF100 footage using a Scene File I tweaked to match the GH2. It comes surprisingly close to GH2 quality using Flow Motion v2.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!