Personal View site logo
  • 257 Replies sorted by
  • @azza_act I recently bought a TIffen water white IR 2.1ND and used it in a broad daylight shoot at around 3 in the afternoon with the "talent" standing with his back to the sun and a reflector bouncing light onto his face.

    The filter was strong enough that I had to use ISO 640 or 800 to expose reasonably at F1.8 and 1/50sec. I would imagine that an ND3.0 would be a bit much for most situations.

    a 3.0 filter is ten f-stops, so if you wanted to shoot with your lens at f2.0 it would give you the same amount of brightness as shooting at f64.

    I've attached a screen grab as it looked straight out of the camera with the 2.1 ND filter.

    sullivan-01.png
    1920 x 1080 - 2M
  • @vicx

    Can you make fotos of the filters you use and also some test shots to see how they affect shrpness and if they induce color shift?

  • I just received my FOTGA filters and I'm glad I didn't fork out for B&W. The FOTGA filters are just fine optically but ND2, ND4 and ND8 are not strong enough and I find myself using the VariND exclusively. The other thing about using a variND is having access to something that can offer fine real-time adjustment to exposure. I didn't expect that I would use it like an iris/aperture ring on the lens. (in a lot of ways its more practical than aperture control).

  • Hi guys, I'm using the helipad 72mm Vari ND and its a fine filter but in board day light it's not strong enough. So I was looking into this http://www.adorama.com/BW72ND1XC.html Good choice?

  • @einstein7

    No need to crosspost to different topics.

  • I've been using a $30 72mm Opteka vnd for a while now after using a diy polarizing set and haven't seen any negative effects or artifacts also no color shift or polarizing, turns purple just as it goes black.

  • I'd like to buy the Tiffen indie ND kit. However, I can't figure out whether the standard or IR version is best suited to the GH2. Could anyone advise?

    Thanks in advance.

  • @tommy

    In fact, the matte box has another 4-5 mm of adjustment either way. Here's mine attached to an 82mm step-ring (outer diameter 84.3mm).

    Mini_MJattebox_adjust.png
    266 x 400 - 211K
  • @tommy

    I don't know the diameter of the AC90's hood. If you don't know it yourself you might like to find out :-)

    Good glass filters with a fixed ND are better than a variable ND. Matte boxes are *supposed * to be faster to use for filters than screw-types, but somehow I don't trust that rule when it comes to what you want to do with that kind of camcorder.

    I use the Cavision mini matte box (But then, I use a GH2). I am currently using a .6 ND Cokin P which fits in. I have a 3" Cavision graduated ND (.3) and have ordered a Cavision 3" .6 - which will be my most used filter.Of course, I can double-up on filters in the 2 slots.

    Anyway, all this is a moot point, diameter-wise. I'm just raising the possibility because sometimes you can get lucky.

  • @goanna I will claim the camera as my own, the first day I have it. But saw the hood off... mmm So (how do) you know for sure the 85mm circular clamp mount will fit over the existing hood? (without knowing the measurements of the hood). You also would suggest/ prefer 1 or 2 ND filters in stead of a Variable ND in this case. Thanks!

  • @tommy

    I'm still incredulous as to decisions to neglect ND filters in Professional* cameras like the AC90 and Sony's F3 .

    Unless you want to claim the camera as your own on day one and get handy with a hack-saw and Dremel, All I can suggest is maybe a Cavision mini matte box (85mm rear circular clamp mount) will fit over the existing hood and allow two 3" square filters at a time.

    http://www.cavision.com/matteboxes/3x3hs/3x3new.htm

    *Professional, unlike amateur, broadcast and cinema, is used to describe the needs of promo and wedding videographers. Typically, cost and time-saving factors are built -in. (ie an ND should be in the top ten of what's included!)

  • Does anyone have a good solution for reducing light ( variable ND/ filter holder) on the AC90, where the lens hood can not be removed? (see picture)

    Explanation: I want to purchase the AC90. I will buy an UV filter (49mm) to protect the lens, and as there is no ND filter I thought of putting a variable ND (when necessary) on the UV filter. But as the lenshood is fixed, I suppose it will be very difficult to reach and 'turn' the variable ND. I've also read a single ND is better for the buck (and better quality for the money). A mattebox is maybe a bit big for me, so perhaps 1 (or 2) ND filters in a nice 'holder' is more easy.

    Because I don't have experience with filter holders or a mattebox and because the lenshood is fixed I was hoping to hear some suggestions. Many Thanks!

    lens-hood-.jpg
    531 x 591 - 183K
  • I'm doing the whole going around in circles thing trying to decide on ND filters as well. At the moment I'm also liking the look of the Tiffen set of filters that Shane Harlbut talks about:

    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/729107-REG/Tiffen_W77INDNDKT_77mm_Indie_Neutral_Density.html

    However, a couple of thoughts. He developed the indi set with Tiffen so may not be completely unbiased in his views - if people who follow his site religiously (which I don't) know that this isn't the case, please chime in with your thoughts.

    My other concern is he's mad about Canon cameras. There was comment on his page about using these filters on the GH2 but he dodged the question. Okay, so Canon cameras have a strong IR filter already in place, does that hold true for the GH2. Does anyone know if the IR thing holds true for cameras other than Canon DSLRs? Would hate to drop the cash on these filters and then realise that the IR version was a better choice.

  • Just picked up my first real filter. A 77mm Marumi NEO MC-ND8 I am not at all an expert, but I am very pleased with the results and price. I used this filter in the top video in this link for everything until the sun was down. All the elevation shots were from behind thick glass. http://www.personal-view.com/talks/discussion/3945/driftwood-settings-series-6-comp-apocalypse-now-cluster-galaxian-gx1-sedna-canis-etc...#Item_371

  • Does anyone know of a store in Jakarta, Indonesia or Yogyakarta, Indonesia where I can buy a 77mm Fader ND? I would also need a 58-77mm step up ring.

    I'll be surprised if anyone can suggest a store. :)

  • I ordered this one : http://www.fotomayr.de/webkat98/index_fi.htm

    Hope to get it soon and test it ... Heliopan Variograufilter (mit Frontgewinde) - ND 0,3 - ND 1,8

  • Heliopan seems to use zeiss glass.

  • @adamquesada , thank you, I have upgraded all my lenses to 77mm rings from Cordvision , so now need filters in 77mm ... but that one above is the most expensive I'm not sure if its worth the money ...

  • some users have reviewed it on bandh

  • Anyone tried : Kenko 77mm Variable NDX Digital Multi Coated Filter ND2.5 - ND1000 ? Any reviews ?

  • Is anyone using Cokin ND's?

  • I've never used an Heliopan filter, but from this test:

    http://www.lenstip.com/115.16-article-Polarizing_filters_test_Heliopan_ES_Pol_circ._SH-PMC_72_mm.html

    it seems clear that Heliopan's skill at making circular polarizers are sub par. So allow me to be a bit skeptic about Heliopan's ability to deliver "the best" variable ND.

  • Thi is wrong topic, use 4x4 one.

  • Just bought a set of Century Optics (Schneider) 4x4 filters. There is soft edge/half grad ND0.6, full gradND0.9 and a polariser. Not too bad for just slightly under $400, comes with a nice 4 slot pouch. Now to test the quality. One piece of MP true vision glass by Schneider otherwise is about $550!!!!!!