You are welcome, however excuse me, I am not detailed about editing software.
Hi mate! :-)
" is this just something happening to me ?"
I think that is normal in my latest settings. Although the first 1 second is unstable, it is satisfactory after that.
"Have you been in contact lately with @towi?"
Lately no. However. since I also think that he is more detailed than me in the PAL situatioos. I may do need help from him. :-)
Thanks for using GOLGOP3-13 and report! :-)
"How much effort would it be to derive a setting from GOLGOP3 that uses 2 P-frames instead of 2 B-frames between the I-frames?"
Since I have not tried, it is not detailed, but I think so much that it does not take time. I do before long.
@bkmcwd: I still enjoy using GOLGOP3, I have a hard time, though, to get the material cut in the compressed domain without seeing defect bogus frames before the good ones - most certainly a shortcoming of the software I use for that cutting, and not GOLGOPs fault :-)
Since I suspect that the software has a hard time dealing with the B frames, I was wondering: How much effort would it be to derive a setting from GOLGOP3 that uses 2 P-frames instead of 2 B-frames between the I-frames? (I know that this would lose some coding efficiency, but would still like to try it... if only to make sure that this would make the relevant difference to the cutting software.)
BTW: Right this morning, I was playing around with my newly bought polarizing filter during breakfast. Suddenly, a bird of prey (not seen that often in my back yard) appeared in our plum tree - and I can say the polarizing filter was my only chance to take a decent shot through the 3 layers of window glass between the bird and me... ;-) And GOLGOP certainly helped to retain some useful IQ, as this bird sat in the shadow of the leaves, while the sunlight illuminated some of the background very bright...
@bkmcwd, Thanks for your new settings.
I used "natural_standard" and shot at 24H mode. Good Q value and optimal bitrate in all scenes.
Thanks for your hard work!
*Bitrate around about 40-90Mbps
*FILM MODE is STD.(-2,0,+1,0) and the lens is LUMIX X PZ45-175mm
*SANDISK Extream HD 30MB/s
You are welcome and thanks! :-) If I can take time, I will add English captions.
"Could you tell me the main difference between natural and GOP3ZILLA series ?"
Although there is no telling whether to be transmitted in my English, I explain. :-)
Of course, qp used in macroblocks is different. As a result, a difference appears also in the bit rate.
With natural, the codec works correctly like attached StreamParser also in the extreme scene in which stray of the codec tends to occur.
For example, although a few level lines of high qp macroblocks with GOP3ZILLA appears on such a scene, it does not appear in natural. On the other hand, with GOP3ZILLA, the highest image quality is realized in most everyday scenes. These character is mainly seen in 24p.
Thanks! :-)
I referred to this site and made it by myself. http://www.diycamera.com/index.html Of course, I have also experimented in many things.
Although I myself did not have a special web page, the introduction movie of how to make my gimbal made.
However, since its original work of DIY SteadiCam requires time and money considerably, if it is not your purpose to enjoy to make, I will recommend you to buy Merlin or Flycam etc.
@bkmcwd looks sweet, can you provide any info on this diy setup :) ?
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!