..Just did some fast test with 720 Sedna A, and @Driftwood latest 720 experimental matrix set.
Test is done with max 5 minutes time differences, with the exact same settings. in PAL
Weather is bad here, but it did not changes in that time.
The "720 experimental matrix set " was 1/3 stop lighter then with Sedna!!
Does this mean that the experimental matrix set is meant for low light takes?.
Vibrant 0 -2 0 -2
iso 200
SS 1/50
F8

ps.
Do i really see a greater color space, or are i am just a idiot?

@peternap Mysteron burst..

@Mozes Natural light changes much more than it appears or we think. In several patch comparisons, I thought I saw a difference between patches that turned out not to be there once the lighting was fully controlled. Note, this was not while testing Mysteron - I have not done that extensively enough yet.To check color and brightness differences, you need completely controlled light to be sure.

Look at the PNG file comparisons I did of Factory vs Orion vs Sedna Aq1 A and C that I made earlier this week. When I did my first natural light comparison during the day, I had thought there might be a brightness difference too - but the controlled lighting test debunked that and showed the difference was in the detail. Note that I am referring to the way the images looked wihtout post, though you can use those PNG files to test with post as well.

@wigginjs @paglez Delkin also makes a 95MB/s. I use the 16GB version regularly and (other than spanning) it has worked well with 24H on every Driftwood patch released before Mysteron burst this year. I have not tried Mysteron burst, nor have I tried a higher capacity version of the card. If they a 64GB model, it may span - I am unsure.

SanDisk 30MB/s and 45MB/s are some of the better performing non 95MB/s cards. I would be happy to compare them, if they were not two of the only cards I had, had physically break on me. I should probably write them about that, because I can`t believe that is normal for the cards, and yet it has never happened with the cheaper Transcend ones.

Anyway, with my Transcend cards (like the 64GB SDXC) detail level, ISO, etc.all make a big difference in terms of whether I can record for very long with a given patch. Some combinations stop after a few seconds, others go on for minutes. I was able to shoot takes over 3 minutes in 720 50P with Sedna Aq1 C at ISO 1600 or 1250 last week with the Transcend 64GB SDXC but that was outside as it was getting quite dark, so there was less visual information. In high detail situations I sometimes had trouble with the same combination on that card.

So if you want fully reliable, the 95MB/s cards seem to be the way to go whether they are Delkin or SanDisk. But spanning has not been verified on Delkin yet - it needs higher capcity card testing.

I´m shooting only on 720 50p. In the last time I don´t have tried every settings like in the past, but for me Sedna A is still the best too! Had made few shot now with Orion dark V3, because I had to be sure that the camera spans for about 2-3 Minutes but it´s not the same.. And with Sedna Q20 I have smoother pans than AQ1? Or just mi imagination?

@thepalalias "SanDisk 30MB/s and 45MB/s are some of the better performing non 95MB/s cards. I would be happy to compare them, if they were not two of the only cards I had, had physically break on me." Sorry, I haven't understand what you mean. I'd like to know more about the new Sandisk 45MB/s... it's working with Sedna AQ1-Mysteron Burst?

p.s. New Sandisk 45MB/s is the one in this photo

@telefoninomac I would love to tell you more but I had one 30MB/s and one 45MB/s SanDisk and they both physically broke before the newest set of patches came out. As in, parts of the plastic came off, etc.and the card cannot be recognized in one case.

I will try to find time to write SanDisk about replacements now that the music video and Joanna St. Claire single are finished.

The very little I've done with Burst has been disappointing. Usually only a few seconds but at night, it went on for a minute and I stopped it. I decided to try it on Zeus while it was overcast. I need to spend more time with it. It's looking a little more promising.

Impressive!

4:2:0 ... sigh ... =) Other than that it looks great. Is that burst or non-burst?

@Driftwood left is Raw.

Right photo is raw. more detail & color grade but not by much is my guess

@lumixuser Actually I was just seeing if it would go for more than a few seconds, I'm not using a garbage lens and you can keep your fucking comments to yourself from now on. Thanks for the critique!