Personal View site logo
NVidia Ampere GPUs from RTX 3050 to RTX 3090 Ti
  • 161 Replies sorted by
  • Micro cracking on BGA will be a short term issue with this kind of temperature behavior.

  • Small talk from Taiwan

    Engineers who worked on RX3080 and RX3090 design told on local closed group chat that thermal design for cards that have FE boards and even less dense custom ones are indeed horrible. And despite that thanks to special throttling and local power management of the main chip they are able to keep its temperature more or less ok - on the board itself it can be areas of too high temperature, especially near VRM and RAM same as in referenced thermal images above.

    BGA and memory issues are very probable.

    Next thing - Nvidia actually plan shift main focus and promotion on cards with 16GB and more memory. Including 20Gb RX3080 and 24GB RX 3090. All cards with RAM below 16GB will be called "low end and obsolete models" already in 2021. RX3xxx update will focus to bring all memory sizes to 16GB except 1050/1650 level cards. GT1030 replacement also coming with around 3x performance.

  • Custom RX3090 prices

    image

    sa14740.jpg
    598 x 579 - 66K
  • Compare to 1080 Ti boards

    image

    sa14714.jpg
    800 x 391 - 75K
  • Main issue is super thermally dense boards due to decision to shorten PCB

    NVIDIA PG133 Founders Edition board:

    image

    Long term problems are very probable.

  • Issue with high memory temps

    image

    image

    In reality 3080 and 3090 require proper water cooling systems with at least 360mm radiators, but we still have all sites claiming how it is nice and ok.

    https://www.igorslab.de/en/gddr6x-am-limit-ueber-100-grad-bei-der-geforce-rtx-3080-fe-im-chip-gemessen-2/

    sa14712.jpg
    800 x 550 - 72K
    sa14713.jpg
    800 x 319 - 29K
  • Difference in Blender

    image

    sa14698.jpg
    800 x 181 - 29K
  • 3090 advantage in games

    image

    sa14692.jpg
    800 x 346 - 52K
  • image

    sa14680.jpg
    800 x 166 - 37K
  • CUDA Performance

    image

    image

    sa14678.jpg
    770 x 254 - 26K
    sa14679.jpg
    769 x 670 - 58K
  • Board design

    NVIDIA PG132 reference board for 3080:

    image

    NVIDIA PG132 reference board 3090:

    image

    Next time then press will tell you something about very costly top board design and expense on extra memory bus - you can spit them into their prostitute face, as board is literally the same, just less power phases.

    NVIDIA PG133 Founders Edition board:

    image

    sa14675.jpg
    800 x 457 - 91K
    sa14676.jpg
    800 x 419 - 99K
    sa14677.jpg
    800 x 483 - 89K
  • PSUs

    image

    sa14642.jpg
    629 x 740 - 111K
  • Stupid mining efficiency measurements

    image

    sa14610.jpg
    800 x 204 - 38K
  • Colorful GPUs

    image

    Note how it is first time that better process did not help much.

    One guy in industry I talked with told that Ampere GPUs will be very prone to BGA issues and board burnouts. Life of such cards if it is not used with water cooling can be limited to 2 years (if used heavily).

    sa14597.jpg
    565 x 261 - 43K
  • image

    As expected - design of the cooling is not best for 3080 FE.

    sa14589.jpg
    800 x 500 - 64K
  • Quadro card based on Ampere will be having less disabled CUDA cores

    • GPU GA102 chip
    • 10752 fake CUDA cored (actually 5376)
    • 1860Mhz clock
    • 384 bit memory bus
    • 48Gb memory GDDR6
    • Quadro A8000 name

    Actual number of CUDA cores in GA102 is around 5500, but some can be disabled.

  • Good youtube video must be like this one

  • More leaked benchmarks

    image

    image

    image

    sa14557.jpg
    677 x 415 - 42K
    sa14558.jpg
    678 x 371 - 37K
    sa14559.jpg
    675 x 334 - 33K
  • EVGA 3090 cards

    image

    sa14556.jpg
    800 x 547 - 74K
  • RTX 3090 in the case

    image

    sa14546.jpg
    746 x 596 - 68K
  • 3090 ti or a titan based on 3090 should be grate to see its capabilities

  • RTX 3080 Benchmarks

    • 3DMark Fire Strike Performance: 31919 (+25% к 2080 Ti, +43% к 2080 Super)
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme: 20101 (+24% 2080 Ti, +45% 2080 Super)
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra: 11049 (+36% 2080 Ti, +64% 2080 Super)
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Time Spy: 17428 (+28% 2080 Ti, +49% 2080 Super)
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Time Spy Extreme: 8548 (+38% 2080 Ti, +59% 2080 Super)
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Port Royal: 11455 (+45% 2080 Ti, +64% 2080 Super)

    In average RTX 3080 is 33% faster than RTX 2080 Ti and 54% faster than RTX 2080 Super.