Personal View site logo
Olympus controlled demolition, follow topic to get realtime updates
  • 159 Replies sorted by
  • Some mental issues

    Olympus UK’s Mark Thackara:

    Nobody can promise that Olympus will be here in 100 years time, as you can’t say that about any brand. What I can say is, we have seen the product road map, including the new lens one, and it’s very exciting. The company wouldn’t be bringing out news lenses if they didn’t believe in the system. We are quietly positive.

    Don’t panic. As far as we are concerned it is business as usual. Businesses change hands and flourish, so there no reason this won’t be the case here. I have been through all sorts of ups and downs in my 35 years with Olympus. Our basic technology and core proposition are still very good.

    He can say anything to sell you remaining stock, literally everything.

  • October strong rumors

    First step of liqudation firm during October will be closure of all remaining service and demo parts. As it is very nice way to reduce expenses (that had been already cut greadually in recent years, as service degraded outside Japan).

    As soon as October Olympus can factually cease to repair their cameras (openly it will be said opposite, remember!).

    All the parts for cameras bodies repair (bodies, sensor assembly, mainnboard) will be sold as metal, plastic and such to special firms.

    It is not decided still considering lenses, they can hold until january and some repair firm can buy remaining parts stock, as well as some repair related equipment and few people.

  • Most fun fact that

    Expect new video in few months from same guy who will explain that Olympus closure is nothing and it is fully ok and is good for camera users.

    This guy made exactly such video. 100%.

  • @jleo...equally bad...like that movie !

  • Olympus Has Fallen

    image

    2Olympus-Has-Fallen_Teaser1sht_web-610x903 copy.jpg
    458 x 677 - 77K
  • Cooking books

    Revenue Declined 8% due to difficult business environment, lack of new products in 1H caused by the restructuring of manufacturing bases, and COVID-19 impact in 4Q. Operating loss decreased due to absence of restructuring expenses recorded last year and improved SG&A efficiency.

    Some dealers are moving toward resuming business but still many regions are under severe outing restrictions. Online marketing (such as utilizing SNS) will need to be strengthened Expect demand in end consumer market to take more time

    In the digital camera field of the Imaging Business, if the market contracts more sharply than anticipated, the Olympus Group may be unable to adequately counter the resulting sales decline with the restructuring measures currently implementing, and this may adversely affect the Olympus Group’s earnings.

    https://www.olympus-global.com/ir/data/brief/2020.html

    Most people don't get the trick company used.

    As they moved release date of report they actually make you think that it include April and May data, and of course it does not have any of it.

    Olympus disaster happened in this last two months.

  • All is bad, really bad. Expect new video in few months from same guy who will explain that Olympus closure is nothing and it is fully ok and is good for camera users.

  • And the process has began, slowly, but steady.

    Olympus plans to exit its camera business in South Korea hit by decreasing sales, focusing instead on optical equipment for medical purposes and scientific equipment, the Korean branch of the Japanese manufacturer said Thursday.

    In a statement, Olympus Korea said it will “cease its imaging business in Korea, effective June 30, 2020.” Its Brand Store, a store operated by Olympus Korea in southern Seoul, and its online shopping mall E-store will also be closed on the same day.

    The company, however, added it will keep operating the service division until March 31, 2026. The division is responsible for repairing and exchanging Olympus products.

    The Korean unit said the decision was mostly because of declining sales volume.

    “Olympus Korea had made strenuous efforts to increase the profitability and efficiency of its imaging business by concentrating on mirrorless cameras, including OM-Dand PEN as well as interchangeable lenses. However, over the last few years, the market has sharply declined. As a result, it has become barely possible to sustain the business with profit, leading to the decision to withdraw the imaging business from the market,” the company said.

  • Here we go again, wet dreams

    We can clearly say that we have no plans to sell our business, despite the rumors…The consumer business really leads in developing new technologies for us, that are then sometimes used in other divisions, like medical and life science products. Our role besides our own [imaging] business, is really to lead technology and innovation for the entire company. So yes, we will continue this business.

    https://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2020/05/06/olympus-interview-em1ii-will-stay-starry-sky-af-and-more

    Company now selling 10% or below cameras compared to last year and we still have such interviews.

  • New press release

    In light of the spread of the new coronavirus(COVID-19) in countries around the world, Olympus Corporation (hereinafter the “Company”) and its subsidiaries are requesting the domestic and overseas employees to work from home, etc. with the purpose of preventing infections from the spread of the new coronavirus. Under these circumstances, the Company is making every effort to continue providing products and services to medical professionals and other stakeholders. However, the Company has judged that it is difficult to proceed with the scheduled accounting procedures implemented by the Company and its domestic and overseas affiliates as scheduled. The Company will postpone the announcement of the fiscal year ended March 2020, which was scheduled for early May, to May 29th. The date of the 152nd general meeting of shareholders is scheduled for late June 2020. The Company will announce this specific schedule as soon as it is decided. The Company sincerely apologizes for the inconvenience and concern caused to our shareholders, investors, and other stakeholders, and asks you for your understanding.

    Report for camera division will be horrible,

    Olympus sales as far as I checked dropped 90-95% in some countries.

  • Some people thought that Olympus was planning to reduce or even close its imaging business, but that is not the case. Imagery continues to play an important role in the business, by being at the forefront of technologies or innovations. We will therefore certainly maintain the imaging activity as an important part of Olympus society. The rapid pace of technological development could help accelerate certain developments in medical devices or life sciences. The photo division is also our public face, and contributes to the fact that many people know about Olympus, which should promote the presence of the brand.

    From French interview. Quite shitty one.

    I am sure that Olympus is planning to do lot of things with all of 4-5 people marketing they'll soon have left in the world. And 10 influencers.

  • As consumer cameras part of corporation is being close to death, medical part is expected to get absolutely record profits in coming months. As Olympus is leading manufacturer of bronchoscopes that will be soon bought in 10-20x volume and special premium prices.

  • At Olympus, we work hard to make people’s lives healthier, safer, and more fulfilling through our technologies and products, and we prioritize the well-being of our team, ambassadors, and customers above all else.

    Due to recent public health concerns we have made the difficult decision to postpone all consumer events in the United Stated and Canada until further notice. We look forward to rescheduling these events as soon as possible and will contact registrants directly once revised event information is confirmed.

    We are also providing information regarding the best ways to clean and disinfect your camera gear. If you have any additional feedback or questions, please contact our Customer Service team at getolympus.com/contactus for further assistance. Thank you for your patience and understanding.

    As we'll be out of this it is super high probability that it won't be Olympus brand on camera market anymore.

  • Biggest Olympus advantage can be if management will be able to close gracefully and silently, and do it before total collapse of sales.

  • Olympus will launch the new Olympus E-M1III in mid February! I Still have no images and specs but I should receive some info soon…

    Even if we will see this camera it'll be just another price hike, same LSI (renaming by PR department does not count) and old sensor.

  • Olympus visionary telling you that Olympus should do, yes it is weird logic

  • This is like the Christian vision of 'the end of the world is near'.

  • Cameras and interchangeable lenses have a rapid development cycle of technologies such as image processing and optics, and will be the driving force of imaging, which is the core of Olympus technology. The technology cultivated in the imaging business is useful for 4K endoscope systems in the medical field.

    Real tragedy comes. And no, you don't need consumer m43 cameras tech for 4K endoscopes, no way.

    https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXMZO53703240T21C19A2000000/

  • @johnbrawley

    In both cases they have their own relationship that is fire walled. Their Sony contacts have no contact with the other parts of the sensor business. Sony semi treat Sony themselves as a customer, just the same way they would treat any customer, they have their own client liaison. They develop and customise the chips to their clients specifications. Everything with a price of course. That’s their business. They don’t practice favouritism. I think that’s why you see so many sony sensors in so many supposedly competitive brands.

    "Sony semi treat Sony themselves as a customer, just the same way they would treat any customer" this part is only partially true. Sony never provides same sensors to third parties at same terms as to their own department, normally they also have agreed delay on new cameras releases from other companies.

    Considering visionaries and ambassadors, most of this people are very good and nice guys. I know lot of them personally. Issue is that whole institution is outdated and now plays destructive role for manufacturers.

    Proper way is to involve masses (of course it will be 1-5% of really interested people) into cameras design from day one. Open new talents, bring up engineers from other fields and so on and so on. Make cameras modular and with documented interfaces, so small firms and competition will be able to offer their solution.

    Smartphones market has lot of issues, but it is very fluid, with lot of knowledge and lot of practically open things. If not the secret Sony/Samsung cartel here - sensor improvements could be much more radical. And it seems like we could see mobile sensors war in coming 2-3 years.

  • @Vitaliy_Kiselev

    That’s not the way I understand it. I work with two companies that work with Sony sensors. In both cases they have their own relationship that is fire walled. Their Sony contacts have no contact with the other parts of the sensor business.

    Sony semi treat Sony themselves as a customer, just the same way they would treat any customer, they have their own client liaison. They develop and customise the chips to their clients specifications. Everything with a price of course. That’s their business. They don’t practice favouritism. I think that’s why you see so many sony sensors in so many supposedly competitive brands.

    I’m technically an Olympus Visionary, but that simply reflects that I have a consulting relationship with Olympus to help them understand what more professional users want in video features. I don’t have a YouTube channel, I’m not out there marketing hard for them. I occasionally make content for them, but it’s more an exercise in field testing for them and they use it for internal training, not as marketing material. Here’s a video that was or originally an internal training video showing the PRO primes when they launched, and trying to explain the difference between their log-ish profile and then graded images. The bottom left corner of this film is ungraded.

    When there’s a topic that I feel I can speak to with some first hand knowledge, like this one, I’ll weigh in, but it’s not mindless shrilling.

    I’ve always tried to be camera agnostic. I use any camera that get’s me the shot I want and I learned long ago there’s no one perfect camera that can do everything. I’m shooting right now with a mix of Arri, Olympus, GoPro and Blackmagic cameras. My camera letter codes go up to S. Because that’s what I’d be using anyway, not what I’m paid to use or PAID TO SAY I’m using, which seems to be the case more.

    I respect Olympus for their choice to often travel the road less travelled. Much like I respect Blackmagic for being brave enough to do what no one else will do. Olympus have a proud history of innovation. I mean they had the first camera with live view. Not that long ago it wan’t a thing and yet now it’s common. They had a supersonic cleaning system for the sensor when everyone else thought it routine to have to clean the sensor for sensor dirt. I’ve never had to clean any of my Olympus camera sensors. I still have to swab my M series Leica’s

    Their IS has always been a generation ahead of everyone else. I respect that innovation and those are the reasons I’m happy to associate myself with them as a brand, especially because they have invited feedback directly from me and I feel very proud to have had some of that feedback come though in product. I wouldn’t do it unless I actually am allowed to speak my mind about their product.

    I talked a lot during my early meetings with them about DSLR lenses not being good enough for manual focussing and now look at the Pro Primes. They have hard stops now and you can easily do repeat manual focus pulls and they all weigh the same and are the same size and filter size for changing on gimbals. They’re also beautiful optics. Olympus see’s itself as an optics company first and foremost by the way. Their logo is a sideways view of a lens.

    Am I going to shoot a big budget series with their cameras ? No. Not unless that’s what’s the story actually called for. But do they offer something unique that I can’t easily replicate with other cameras ? Yes.

  • @johnbrawley

    As far as I see it is now only Sony making competitive m43 sensors for consumer cameras.

    And no, Sony won't sell to anyone, as they are very careful now, already cutting support and people devoted to m43 sensors. One of the people I talked said that they think about stopping all new development on consumer m43 (may leave some industrial).

    Situation with LSI also changed extremely from last years. It is big issues here, largest of all issues that Olympus has.

    Consumers don’t buy cameras any more, they use phones. So the market is shrinking to enthusiast and blogger / you tubers.

    I look at this different. I see exactly firms and their visionaries and ambassadors (who restored almost all their influence around 4-6 years ago, after it went to almost nothing in the end of analog era) who alienated themselves to users and tech persons in last 3-4 years.

    I also see it as disaster of understanding, where visionaries and ambassadors keep promoting "stupid cameras" despite consumers clearly want very advanced "smart cameras".

  • @gaman Here you go https://www.panasonic.com/global/consumer/lumix/ambassadors/photo.html

    @Vitaliy_Kiselev Olympus have always sourced sensors from third parties. Kodak, Sony and Panasonic. And Sony semi will sell to anyone. Really as long as Olympus will pay. Just like they sell to many other camera companies in this field. I don’t think sensors are the challenge it’s the shrinking photo market itself which is where the volume is.

    The component business has no brand alliance in business to business transactions. Within Japan these guys are all happy to sell sensors and components to each other. I don’t think there’s issues there...

    The issue is the market itself. Consumers don’t buy cameras any more, they use phones. So the market is shrinking to enthusiast and blogger / you tubers. We cine users are really a small niche. There’s not enough room for all these cameras.

    JB

  • @johnbrawley

    Interesting post, thanks.

    I am also big m43 fan, and Olympus idea to keep making nice m43 cameras had been nice, as idea.

    It is just two issues - who will be making them very good sensors (as Sony feel less and less inclined to invest human resources in m43), and who will be making them LSI that will be up to the task.

    They started with Panasonic providing both, later kept Panasonic LSI and started to use Sony sensors, same as Panasonic. And as LSI manufacturing had been further sold by alliance that owned it, it is not clear who will make it all.

    Add to this constant pressure of financial underperformance.

    Usually big dealers and PR/marketing/training staff are best indication (in strictly private talks) of that happening. And as far as I can see - nothing good happening at Olympus/

    I also don’t think Panasonic have hit a home run either with L mount. I don’t see much evidence of a rush to full frame from their user base, or appeal to new users. And it’s getting crowded in 135 / FF now.

    As far as my sources tell - it is biggest financial disaster in recent Panasonic cameras sales history.