Looks like to shoot 4k and use M4/3 lenses, you may need to allow a little vignetting. Would be interesting to see how various M4/3 lenses fair in the 86% 4k scan mode, as it looks like any mode with more crop than that, reverts to HD. Images from video above.
SO if I use DX format lens on booster (to m4/3 obviously) what % of sensor will be covered or DX on regular adapter?
other words I still can't figure this out how shot on full "DX size" sensor if its m4/3 mount?
@konjow Appears to me the LS300 supports full S35 100% crop with Nikon DX lenses. With Lumix lenses, you'd need an 80% crop to reduce the sensor to MFT size, but you'd still be able to record in 4K as well as 1080p resolutions. With narrower than 80% crop, you could shoot only in 1080p.
Thanks @lpowell That was my 1st thought
So DX should cover full sensors without booster on regular adapter. hope thats somehow correct! I really like the camera so far.
I really want to see some more footage with this, shot with nice glass. So far its lacking a bit of magic somehow, not helped by the fact that they always seem to be shooting 30p.
Quoting FirstBase but I also think they clearly had the thought of stealing Panasonic's thunder in coming out with their own "AF200." It's hard not to like the on-paper specs of this cam.
I went to NAB looking for this camera to be at the Panasonic booth. Instead it was at JVC and for about the same price I expected to pay.
I would order it but first have a question about the 80% crop for Panasonic MFT lens. Is the top/bottom cut off or just a the center of Sensor used? Do you still get the benefit of larger Sensor for low-light shooting?
It is not unusual for me to need 3200 ISO or higher on my A7s I sent back my HC-X1000 do to poor performance indoors where I do 95% of my shoots. I don't want to get one of these just to send it back.
The Japanese link above lists the crop ratios available in the LS-300 menu:
100% - Super 35 - PL mount, 35mm still lens
97% -
95% -
92% -
87% -
86% -
80% - MFT - Micro Four Thirds lens
76% -
72% -
67% -
63% -
59% -
54% -
52% - Super 16 - C mount, 16mm cinema lens
47% -
43% - 2/3 inch - B4, B3 mount, ENG lens
In 4K resolution, you can shoot in sizes from 100% down to 80%.
In 1080p resolution, you can shoot in sizes from 100% down to 43%.
What worries me, is that if only 80 percent of the sensor is used with my MFT lens, will I only get 80% of the light? I shoot in poor/low light conditions
@RRRoger No, at 80% you get the full amount of light the MFT lens projects into a 16x9 frame within its image circle. What you don't get is the full APS-C sensor with its 1.5x crop factor. You instead get an MFT-sized rectangle centered within that sensor, with about a 2x crop factor. In effect, you are digitally zooming into the sensor to match its frame size to the image circle of each lens.
Quote LPowell: No, at 80% you get the full amount of light the MFT lens projects into a 16x9 frame within its image circle. What you don't get is the full APS-C sensor with its 1.5x crop factor. You instead get an MFT-sized rectangle centered within that sensor, with about a 2x crop factor. In effect, you are digitally zooming into the sensor to match its frame size to the image circle of each lens.
So, if I put a MFT lens on the JVC GY-LS300 like the Rokinon 24mm T1.5 Cine, will it let in all the light the S35 Sensor can handle because of the larger sized glass elements. For a low light situation would it better to use the Rokinon with MFT, or APS-C or FX mount and an adapter?
RRRoger, that will make no difference. The Rokinon lens is a lens that easily covers S35 - whether you choose the lens with a MFT-mount or Canon-mount or Nikon-mount (or whatever). It is a S35 covering lens on which you can choose the mount. No matter what mount you choose when purchasing the lens - it will always cover S35.
There do exist "true MFT"-lenses (so-to-speak), which are likely to cover just an MFT-sensor sized area. For those lenses you need to set the VSM to MFT (80%). There will be no difference in light sensitivity (as the pixelsize can't change of a sensor).
camsr, you are referring to MFT lens like the Panasonic ones I use on my GH4. They have very small glass elements on the mount end. The LS300 will have to be set for 80% to use them properly and when huge DOF is preferred.
The advantages of the Rokinon are probably why this is the only lens I have seen on LS300 CamCorders. It also explains why the LS300 on display at NAB seemed adequate in that low light environment at least through the viewfinder and LCD..
@RRRoger No, it makes no difference - only the maximum aperture of the lens will make a difference is how much light you need for your shot. The advantage of the Rokinon or SamYangs over true MFT lenses would be: 1) focus can be shallower due to larger sensor surface 2) S35 is a "known" sensor size for professionals - so you know which focal length results in which angle of view (the last thing is actually explained in the interview (somwhere around the 5 minute mark) :
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!