Personal View site logo
Olympus E-M5 II, camera topic
  • 346 Replies sorted by
  • @sidecar I agree but the crop appears to always be there. Brawley made a comment in his blog that implied the crop changes. I've asked him to comment on that in another forum we'll see what he says. I found my way around the f stop changes if there is a way to get normal crop without IBIS I'll be fairly happy.

  • Here is a music video shot entirely with the E-M5ii handheld

    and BTS

  • @Scot 'Because the crop is there IBIS on or off' that doesnt sound right it should be 2x, flat

  • I figured something out today. If you want to change shutter or f stop in manual mode there is the touch screen approach which is annoying. That being said you can while using the viewfinder or screen press the OK button which will bring up the same side menu as the touch screen and than the dial is activated. Was very happy to figure that out it was one of my big gripes. Would rather the option to leave it active all the time but at least this is less cumbersome than the touch screen IMO.

  • Because the crop is there IBIS on or off. I'll take the trade off when I need IBIS but when I need the field of view please give me the option.

  • @Scot if IS is off while on the slider how come it seems cropped ?

  • I did a rather disappointing quick test of my hacked GH2 (Sanity) vs the EM5 mkii you might want to check out. Both cameras same exposure at ISO 800. The GH2 was set Smooth -2 across the board. The Olympus was set to Natural -2 to contrast and saturation +1 to sharpness.

  • @ duartix: thanks; very helpful.

  • @Kit_L: according to this link, you can record 720p30 in MOV (MPEG-4AVC/v which is more efficient than MotionJPEG).

    Note: as a compression scheme, All-I is conceptually the same as MotionJPEG (no temporal redundancy is used to improve efficiency as all frames are encoded independently, thus encoding/decoding complexity is far smaller) but, even though MPEG-4 AVC isn't as advanced as h.264, it's still more efficient than JPEG.

    If I had to recommend you one recording mode I would allways record in 1080p30 and downsize later for post. I would use (IPB) 52Mbps as it's more efficient than All-I and the little time you waste downsizing for 720p is clearly worth the upgrade in IQ.

  • image

    The Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II takes the best from the Olympus OM-D E-M5, E-M10, and E-M1, improves them in some areas, as well as adding impressive and innovative new features, giving a digital camera well beyond what is expected at this price point. However, what good is having an all-singing, all-dancing camera, without the lenses to back it up? Thankfully, this is one area where the Micro Four Thirds system really shines, with a large range of lenses already available from Olympus, Panasonic, Sigma and others, along with an ever increasing range of new lenses being released and planned for the future.

    http://www.ephotozine.com/article/olympus-om-d-e-m5-ii-full-review-26883

    sales9.jpg
    800 x 599 - 111K
  • @duartix: thanks for that info. Considering the Motion JPEG 720p/30 setting from this perspective suggests that the Oly's bitrate is almost three times the Panasonic AVCHD settings for the same frame size/rate (from memory, the Pannys have a bitrate of 11-13Mbps).

    Let me put the question another way: is there an AVCHD setting on the Oly that can be used at 720p/30? I only see these options for 1080p.

  • @Kit_L : Having a higher bitrate doesn't necessarily mean better quality. MotionJPEG encodes every frame as an indepenndent JPEG image, without benefitting from temporal redundancy. H264 is highly efficient at compressing consecutive frames, plus it's idependent encoding algorithm is already close to twice as effective (for the same bitrate) as JPEG.

    The only big advantage of MotionJPEG is encoding/decoding complexity.

  • I took delivery of one of these today; I like the body, but am unsure how to set the highest quality 720p/30 I want for my work. We shoot 720p/30 because Vimeo on Demand is the delivery vehicle for our programs, and 30fps renders motion well, and 720p is adequate quality for this purpose, and saves computing time and drive space.

    The back story is that we shoot three G6 bodies (AVCHD, 720p/30, [but really 29.97]; unlimited recording time) and I want to set the Mk II to intercut with the G6s without conforming frame size. I can see how to select the frame rate on the various options, but not the frame size. Or is the Motion JPEG setting the only choice for 720p/30?

    Selecting this option gives:

    Video Tracks: Motion JPEG OpenDML, 1280 × 720, 30 fps, 31.19 Mbps (a higher bit rate than the G6 bodies give at 720p/30; low light video looks very nice)

    Audio Tracks: 16-bit Little Endian stereo, 48 kHz, 1.54 Mbps

    The .avi files are easy and fast to convert with MPEG Streamclip (and I can change the frame rate to 29.97 at the same time), but is there a better way?

  • @brudney I'm hoping he whose name shall not be spoken just got it wrong someone else said 2.4 I can live with that. Hopefully I may get mine if Best Buy ever ships I preordered joke on me. Will never use Best Buy again they have had it on preparing order all week so I could not even cancel.

  • @Scot yeah, 2.7 crop is pretty pretty bad. I wonder if it's because MAYBE they do a bit of a software post-IBIS stabilization... hmmm... :)

  • image

    The High Res Shot mode, which has evolved from the sensor-shift stabilisation system (which Olympus also developed) provides a welcome boost to the capabilities of the company's Micro Four Thirds cameras.

    Even though its applications are limited, this development is genuinely new and exciting. It gives technical writers a fascinating subject to investigate and photo enthusiasts a reason to invest in new equipment. Olympus merits praise for 'going boldly where others fear to tread'.

    But even photographers for whom the High Res Shot mode is of minimal interest will find the E-M5 Mark II provides some attractive reasons to choose it, rather than other 'mirrorless' CSCs. The substantial improvements to its movie functionality and performance and its more adjustable LCD monitor make it more useful to some users than the E-M1, while the latter's slightly better weatherproofing and phase-contrast AF system provide quantifiable advantages for long-time users of Olympus DSLR cameras.

    http://www.photoreview.com.au/reviews/advanced-compact-cameras/interchangeable-lens/olympus-om-d-e-m5-mark-ii

    nikon25.jpg
    599 x 447 - 36K