Here we are, 2 years later - they'll finally attack "to punish" the use of chemical weapons, but not to drop Assad because they don't want opposition in power either. Kreml is not amused. What I don't understand, why would Assad use c-weapons now, that's obviously the dumbest and most pointless move to make and I'm sure he can't be that stupid?
What I don't understand, why would Assad use c-weapons now, that's obviously the dumbest and most pointless move to make and I'm sure he can't be that stupid?
Just do not expose yourself to western mass media so much, and you won't have such questions :-) As all this thing won't be possible without prostitutes in mass media.
I don't have TV and don't read news online - I'm not exposed to mass media since couple of month, I just heard about the (strategically idiotic) chemcial attack so I'm asking since many different views come together here.
Have any of you been in Syria before the outbreak of "civil war"? I was. In Syria, it was the most educated people in the Middle East (except maybe Iran). I wonder whether this delectable owner of a cafe in Damascus, who studied in Prague, who knew several languages (Russian, English, Czech, Polish), if he's still alive? They all have their own interests in Syria: Russia, USA, Great Britain, France, China, Iran, Turkey, Al-Qaeda, but we all have in the ass lives of ordinary people. UN Security Council can not agree on Syria, that is to say that no one wants to end this holocaust. Look at how the present borders of Syria. Who has set them? The people of Syria? Or maybe the great European democracies? France, the United Kingdom, which have always cared about the interests of the people in their colonies (sarcasm)? Everyone wants to settle Hitler for his crimes? When the colonial powers to pay for the crimes committed against the people in their former colonies? Yes I know I'm naive, but I do not fuck with Peace, having loaded gun.
@Mihuel clearly not enough syrians were concerned about their own country. The invading radical islamist mercenaries would've had no chance against a unified and armed population, and the insurrection would've been put down in a matter of months, leaving Obama and his gang of warhawks no excuse to bomb it into rubble. Granted, Assad has run an autocratic regime that much of the population did not like, but the alternative is coming soon, and it aint good for ordinary syrians
The invading radical islamist mercenaries would've had no chance against a unified and armed population, and the insurrection would've been put down in a matter of months, leaving Obama and his gang of warhawks no excuse to bomb it into rubble.
It is good idea to research the subject, and check the numbers of trained armed man that corporations US, UK, Turkey are constantly delivering to Sirya.
Granted, Assad has run an autocratic regime that much of the population did not like, but the alternative is coming soon, and it aint good for ordinary syrians
Isn't it interesting that population stopped liked "regime", right after big corporations decided so?
" Isn't it interesting that population stopped liked "regime", right after big corporations decided so? " I understand your point of view, but this is a huge simplification. It seems to me that if anyone wants to defend Assad should focus on the great diversity of Syria, which Assad regime through a single entity. The price of this unity was very high. Once again we must thank France and the UK for colonial politics. THANK YOU!
It seems to me that if anyone wants to defend Assad should focus on the great diversity of Syria, which Assad regime through a single entity. The price of this unity was very high. Once again we must thank France and the UK for colonial politics. THANK YOU!
Hmm. So all this years they had absolutely no understanding of their country, and you had :-)
Btw, side you are supporting here won in Iraq. Check consequences.
I hope, it may help for the discussion:
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!