Personal View site logo
Make sure to join PV on Telegram or Facebook! Perfect to keep up with community on your smartphone.
Please, support PV!
It allows to keep PV going, with more focus towards AI, but keeping be one of the few truly independent places.
COVID: New article on how virus damages a brain
  • Numerous enveloped viruses use specialized surface molecules called fusogens to enter host cells. During virus replication, these fusogens decorate the host cells membrane enabling them the ability to fuse with neighboring cells, forming syncytia that the viruses use to propagate while evading the immune system. Many of these viruses, including the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), infect the brain and may cause serious neurological symptoms through mechanisms which remain poorly understood. Here we show that expression of either the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein or p15 protein from the baboon orthoreovirus is sufficient to induce fusion between interconnected neurons, as well as between neurons and glial cells. This phenomenon is observed across species, from nematodes to mammals, including human embryonic stem cells-derived neurons and brain organoids. We show that fusion events are progressive, can occur between distant neurites, and lead to the formation of multicellular syncytia. Finally, we reveal that in addition to intracellular molecules, fusion events allow diffusion and movement of large organelles such as mitochondria between fused neurons. Our results provide important mechanistic insights into how SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses could affect the nervous system circuitries causing neurological symptoms.

    https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.09.01.458544v1

    Actually, whole point of article is to deny uniqueness of COVID in this regard, as no other human virus has such property.

    And it is again ONLY spike protein is enough for damage.

  • 3 Replies sorted by
  • Another research shows that COVID is also designed to work not only with ACE receptors:

    In addition to the ACE2 receptor, Neuropilin-1 can serve as a host for the spike. If we have both receptors - neuropilin increases the ability of the virus to enter cells. However, even if the ACE2 receptor is absent, the presence of Neuropilin-1 alone is sufficient to increase the likelihood of the virus entering the cell compared to the control group.

    And if there are not too many ACE2 receptors scattered throughout the brain, then there is a huge amount of NRP1. This receptor is the coreceptor Semaphorin-3A, which is responsible for the growth of axons, or rather, the direction of their growth.

    Another interesting fact: SARS-CoV-1 released in 2003 showed less infectiousness and did not cause neurological symptoms, which indirectly may indicate that the affinity for NRP1 was added during the design of the new virus. This possibility affects both the success of the infection (we have a bunch of NRP receptors in the nasal cavity) and how well the virus will travel through the nerve tissues.

    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abd2985

  • On spike protein

    The mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, as well as the adenovirus vaccine from Johnson & Johnson, use a mutated version of the S-6P spike, which has no fusogenic activity.

    The Chinese vaccine, Sputnik and AstraZeneca, uses the Native S spike, an unmodified coronavirus spike.

  • Very important research my friend. Thanks for this articles.