Belgium's government on Thursday said it would shut all of the country's nuclear power plants over the next three years.

The last existing nuclear power plants are to close in 2025, local media said, in accordance with a 2003 law.

Speaking at a press conference on Thursday morning, Prime Minister de Croo said the first objective of the agreement would be to ensure security of energy supply.

"Our people and our companies are entitled to that," he said, adding that the second objective was "to fully opt for innovation."

"In concrete terms, this means that we will invest in research into newer technologies," de Croo said, explaining that this included the smaller reactors.

Energy Minister Tinne Van der Straeten, from the Greens, said research would focus on sustainable, flexible and carbon-neutral energy sources.

It'll be real tragedy for normal people, as elites intent to rise energy prices from 5 to 10 fold and turn their life into misery.

The heads of companies EDF, Good Energy and Energy UK have asked the government in London to resolve the situation amid rising gas prices that are leading the country and its industry to a national disaster. Experts said that the crisis in Britain is associated with a shortage of Russian gas supplies to Europe.

“This is a national crisis. Wholesale gas and electricity prices have risen to unprecedented levels in the past three weeks, ”said Good Energy CEO Nigel Pocklington.

EDF spokesman Philippe Kommare assessed the situation in the energy sector as critical and predicted a further deterioration in the situation. Suppliers are trying to support consumers, but the industry's problems are too great.

Investec analyst Martin Young allowed electricity tariffs to skyrocket to 56 percent. At the moment, the average household in the UK spends on these needs 1277 pounds per year, but in April 2022 the amount of these expenses may grow to two thousand pounds

Main proposal here is force Russian motherfuckers to provide gas for price that will be dictated by UK. Free market, my ass.

Global power consumption today is about 15 terawatts (TW). Currently, the global nuclear power supply capacity is only 375 gigawatts (GW). In order to examine the large-scale limits of nuclear power, to supply 15 TW with nuclear only, we would need about 15,000 nuclear reactors.

Land and and location: One nuclear reactor plant requires about 20.5 km2 (7.9 mi2) of land to accommodate the nuclear power station itself, its exclusion zone, its enrichment plant, ore processing, and supporting infrastructure. Secondly, nuclear reactors need to be located near a massive body of coolant water, but away from dense population zones and natural disaster zones. Simply finding 15,000 locations on Earth that fulfill these requirements is extremely challenging.

Lifetime: Every nuclear power station needs to be decommissioned after 40-60 years of operation due to neutron embrittlement - cracks that develop on the metal surfaces due to radiation. If nuclear stations need to be replaced every 50 years on average, then with 15,000 nuclear power stations, one station would need to be built and another decommissioned somewhere in the world every day. Currently, it takes 6-12 years to build a nuclear station, and up to 20 years to decommission one, making this rate of replacement unrealistic.

Accident rate: To date, there have been 11 nuclear accidents at the level of a full or partial core-melt. These accidents are not the minor accidents that can be avoided with improved safety technology; they are rare events that are not even possible to model in a system as complex as a nuclear station, and arise from unforeseen pathways and unpredictable circumstances (such as the Fukushima accident). Considering that these 11 accidents occurred during a cumulated total of 14,000 reactor-years of nuclear operations, scaling up to 15,000 reactors would mean we would have a major accident somewhere in the world every month.

Uranium abundance: At the current rate of uranium consumption with conventional reactors, the world supply of viable uranium, which is the most common nuclear fuel, will last for 80 years. Scaling consumption up to 15 TW, the viable uranium supply will last for less than 5 years. Viable uranium is the uranium that exists in a high enough ore concentration so that extracting the ore is economically justified.

Uranium extraction from seawater: Uranium is most often mined from the Earth’s crust, but it can also be extracted from seawater, which contains large quantities of uranium (3.3 ppb, or 4.6 trillion kg). Theoretically, that amount would last for 5,700 years using conventional reactors to supply 15 TW of power. (In fast breeder reactors, which extend the use of uranium by a factor of 60, the uranium could last for 300,000 years. However, these reactors’ complexity and cost makes them uncompetitive.) Moreover, as uranium is extracted, the uranium concentration of seawater decreases, so that greater and greater quantities of water are needed to be processed in order to extract the same amount of uranium. The volume of seawater that would need to be processed would become economically impractical in much less than 30 years.

Exotic metals: The nuclear containment vessel is made of a variety of exotic rare metals that control and contain the nuclear reaction: hafnium as a neutron absorber, beryllium as a neutron reflector, zirconium for cladding, and niobium to alloy steel and make it last 40-60 years against neutron embrittlement. Extracting these metals raises issues involving cost, sustainability, and environmental impact. In addition, these metals have many competing industrial uses; for example, hafnium is used in microchips and beryllium by the semiconductor industry. If a nuclear reactor is built every day, the global supply of these exotic metals needed to build nuclear containment vessels would quickly run down and create a mineral resource crisis. This is a new argument that Abbott puts on the table, which places resource limits on all future-generation nuclear reactors, whether they are fueled by thorium or uranium.

https://phys.org/news/2011-05-nuclear-power-world-energy.html?ref=vc.ru