Platforms like Spotify don't pay for individual streams. They are initially aimed at calculating the remuneration depending on the share of the number of listening to music of one author or another in the "common pot" of streams of all content released on the site. With this approach, there is nothing surprising in the fact that performers from the ten most famous performers earn several times more than slightly less popular musicians. Independent and aspiring creators who are not among the leaders are simply swept the crumbs off the table, even if they gain hundreds of thousands of plays.

Other streaming services that use a similar billing model pay even less, by the way - Pandora and YouTube average $ 0.00203 and $ 0.00154 per stream. It turns out that the problem is of a systemic nature, and if the bulk of the venues continue to adhere to the chosen course, ordinary musicians will get less and less. And at some point, they may completely lose interest in working with such services.

Most people ignore that huge corporations dropped the value of music, video and writing work and they make huge - hundreds of billions a year profits on this. As themselves they are doing nothing, except very questionable quality services and aggregation. But in capitalism it is no real solution for all this.

Hydrogen is extremely bad as fuel. It even has issue with lot of nitrogen oxides if you try to burn it as usual fuel using normal air (hence very good platinum catalyst is always a must).

But best feature for monopolies - you can't store or transport hydrogen. It is very inefficient to store it in liquid form, due to density and necessary temperature. You can also can't store it in any container for long as it goes through walls and in same time likes to damage any metals.

Also from 20 to 80% of all energy is used to actually make hydrogen from something (water, air) and convert to compressed liquid or similar form.

This is main reason why we have extreme attack on gasoline and diesel fuel. As both of them are perfectly fit for private cars and long uncontrolled travel. You also can store them for long periods of time, trade without control and get with you for very long trips. This is very bad features.

In contrast, both electric and hydrogen cars will be 100% rented soon, aimed for short travel and you will be refueling them at the totally controlled manner, using QR codes to cross each zone and to be able to access any refueling station.

A new poll conducted June 11-25 by Momentive on behalf of Axios found that those 18-34 now are evenly split on negative and positive views of capitalism. (46% vs. 49%). The dislike for capitalism rises further at younger age groups. For those 18 to 24, the negative views outweighing positive views by a margin of 54% to 42%.

A new poll by the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) shows younger people growing opposing to capitalism and support for socialism. The paper includes a Forefront Market Research poll of people aged between 16 and 34 in the UK. An astonishing 67 per cent say they would like to live in a socialist economic system.

COVID had been clearly on time.