Tagged with d600 - Personal View Talks https://personal-view.com/talks/discussions/tagged/d600/feed.rss Sat, 04 May 24 21:38:02 +0000 Tagged with d600 - Personal View Talks en-CA Official Nikon D600 and D610 topic https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/3009/official-nikon-d600-and-d610-topic Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:31:21 +0000 bleach551 3009@/talks/discussions image

Specifications:

  • 24,3MP CMOS Sensor (total: 24.7 million)
  • The EXPEED 3 image-processing engine
  • ISO 100-6400 (boost up to 25.600 Hi-1)
  • Image sizes FX: 6,016 x 4,016 (L) 4,512 x 3,008 (M) 3,008 x 2,008 (S)
  • Image sizes DX: 3,936 x 2,624 (L) 2,944 x 1,968 (M) 1,968 x 1,312 (S)
  • 16:9 FX : 6,016 x 3,376 (L) 4,512 x 2,528 (M) 3,008 x 1,688 (S)
  • 16:9 DX: 3,936 x 2,224 (L) 2,944 x 1,664 (M) 1,968 x 1,112 (S)
  • 39 points AF (9 cross-type AF points)
  • 2,016-Segment RGB Meter
  • Frame Rate: 5,5 FPS.
  • Flash Sync: 1/200. Built-in Flash
  • Full HD 1080p24, 25 or 30. 720p60. / MPEG-4, H.264 (bitrate - 24Mbps or 12Mbps)
  • Uncompressed video recording via HDMI
  • Auto DX crop mode (for movie!)
  • 30 minute video limit(!)
  • Stereo mike input and headphone jack
  • Dual SD card slots
  • RAW editor
  • Built in time-lapse functionality
  • New external battery grip
  • Shutter: 1/4,000 ~ 30 sec, bulb. Carbon fiber and Kevlar, tested to 150,000 cycles.
  • Wireless support via WU-1a dongle
  • 100% viewfinder
  • 3.2-inch lcd with 921.000 dots
  • HDMI-output (clear, usable for recording!)
  • Battery - EN-EL15
  • Approximately 141.0 x 113.0 x 82.0 mm (W x H x D)
  • Weight - 760 gram
  • Price: $2100 for body, $2,700 for kit, very far from "entry level"

Reviews and previews:


Available at:


Samples and videos:

]]>
Nikon D600 or Hacked GH2? https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/9563/nikon-d600-or-hacked-gh2 Thu, 06 Feb 2014 21:14:36 +0000 mjwhitaker 9563@/talks/discussions Hey guys,

I've been using a hacked GH2 for a couple of years and have been really happy with the results. Just recently though, I had a shoot and the GH2 gave me some issues. My camera froze several times while using Moon T7, even with a 95mb/s Sandisk, causing me to miss several key shots. Also, when lighting conditions changed unexpectedly, the GH2 once again let me down with its poor low light performance. There were 2 other cameras on the shoot that picked up my slack, both were Nikon D600's. They smashed my low light performance and of course had no difficulties with their firmware. I've been wanting a full frame cam for a while anyway, so today I decided to buy a Nikon D600. Obviously I haven't really had a chance to do much yet, but after some brief initial tests, I think I'm coming down with a case of buyer's remorse. I was wondering if any of you guys had the opportunity to use both cameras on actual shoots and why type of results you got.

]]>
Unusual Timelapse Flicker https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/7856/unusual-timelapse-flicker Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:46:08 +0000 Xenocide38 7856@/talks/discussions Having some issues with a Nikon D600 that I have been using for timelapses recently. I am getting exposure flicker throughout the timelapse and I can't seem to figure out the problem.

Of course all manual settings: ISO, APERTURE, and SHUTTER Using an old manual Nikkor 24mm so setting f-stop on the lens itself Using the D600 internal intervalometer Shooting raw

Unfortunately the only thing that got missed was the camera was accidentally set to auto white balance. However, I selected a specific white balance in Camera Raw in After Effects and that should apply to all of the images. Would auto white balance affect exposure?

The only other possibility I can think of is that I had a mild variable-ND on the lens. I doubt it would have moved but maybe it was shifting somehow with each exposure?

I've got some more trouble shooting to do but thought I'd ask to see if anyone has had a similar issue. I haven't had this issue with previous timelapses I've done with Canon 60D and 5Ds so I'm concerned it's an issue specific to the Nikon D600 but I guess it could be user error too.

Thoughts?

]]>