Tagged with 1920x810 - Personal View Talks https://personal-view.com/talks/discussions/tagged/1920x810/feed.rss Mon, 29 Apr 24 19:00:23 +0000 Tagged with 1920x810 - Personal View Talks en-CA 1920x810 -- the new "Cinemascope (2.35:1)" alternative. https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/3088/1920x810-the-new-cinemascope-2.351-alternative. Wed, 02 May 2012 23:54:44 +0000 JayB38 3088@/talks/discussions With all the talk of "anamorphic" and achieving the widescreen look, what do you think of dslr camera or video cameras giving the options of both 1920x1080 and 1920x810 - particularly that of the Samsung NX dslr cameras. I think it would (I don't know) solve all the pros/cons of achieving the widescreen/anamorphic look. I've wondered as to why we're still into the 16:9 mode in the first place since most films are mosly 1.85:1 to 2.40:1.

I hope I'm not making this an unnecessary post.

a nice thought though, I can dream can I?

]]> Anamorphic with 2.21:1 with 1920x868 resolution? https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/5999/anamorphic-with-2.211-with-1920x868-resolution Sun, 03 Feb 2013 06:41:46 +0000 eminogrande 5999@/talks/discussions Hi,

i am a bit confused. I bought a "16:9 widescreen lens" glass and everything looks anamorphic, picture is stretched too. After playing around with the footage and VLC i recognised, that my footage with (i've used the Anamorphic LPowell Flowmotion Hack) 1920x810 looks stretched here an example:

A few days later i checkt on a "square note" paper and saw, that the image is streched. I endet up with 2.21:1 with 1920x868 resolution. Is that right or am i doing something wrong?

Thank you and best regards Emin

]]>