Personal View site logo
Make sure to join PV on Telegram or Facebook! Perfect to keep up with community on your smartphone.
Please, support PV!
It allows to keep PV going, with more focus towards AI, but keeping be one of the few truly independent places.
Coronavirus: Vaccines efficiency
  • 281 Replies sorted by
  • Scientists at the Institute of Public Health, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the University of Texas Health Science Center found that protection against coronavirus provided by any type of vaccine dropped from 87.9 percent in February to 48.1 percent by October 2021.

    Researchers analyzed the effectiveness of vaccinations among 780,225 US veterans. The decline in immune defenses was assessed over the period from February 1, 2021 to October 1, 2021, which is consistent with the emergence and spread of the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant in the United States.

    The decline was the largest for the Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) vaccine, with infection protection declining from 86.4 percent in March to 13.1 percent in September. The decline in performance for PfizerBioNTech was from 86.9 to 43.3 percent, and for Moderna - from 89.2 to 58 percent.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.abm0620

  • The period of validity of vaccination certificates should be reduced from one year to six months, since antibodies last for less than a year. This was announced during a live broadcast by the chief freelance specialist of the Ministry of Health of Russia on medical prevention in the Ural Federal District, Doctor of Medical Sciences Sergei Tokarev

    "The [vaccination] certificate is still valid for a year because it was designed for the Wuhan strain, which is less aggressive, less pathogenic. The validity period of the certificate would be well worth changing to six months, and perhaps this work will be done," said Tokarev.

    He added that antibodies persist in patients for less than a year.

    It is very dangerous trend.

  • 96 Research Studies Affirm Naturally Acquired Immunity to Covid-19: Documented, Linked, and Quoted

    Immunology and virology 101 have taught us over a century that natural immunity confers protection against a respiratory virus’s outer coat proteins, and not just one, e.g. the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. There is even strong evidence for the persistence of antibodies.

    https://brownstone.org/articles/79-research-studies-affirm-naturally-acquired-immunity-to-covid-19-documented-linked-and-quoted/

  • The new study, which was published Thursday in the Lancet, the British medical journal, is one of few to use detailed infection data from actual examples of household transmission, and it showed that the viral loads of both vaccinated and unvaccinated patients infected with COVID are "broadly similar".

    The data showed that vaccination status doesn't make a whole lot of difference in the ability to pass COVID on to others.

    Roughly 25% of vaccinated household members subsequently tested positive for the virus after close contact with a fellow household member with a confirmed case of COVID. That's compared with 38% of infection for people who haven't been vaccinated.

    https://ru.scribd.com/document/535734554/s-1473309921006484#download&from_embed

  • I'm starting to see reports, if true, that suggest the vaccines are causing an HIV like response. That is to say, vaccinated individuals are having their natural immune systems gradually eroded away. This may be why additional and ongoing booster shots are recommended in order to artificially boost an immune response since the natural immune systems are being damaged.

  • The RDIF said that an "information attack" was being conducted on the vaccine, and warned journalists against using anonymous sources, like Reuters did making fake publication.

    “RDIF asks the media in their materials not to use unreliable anonymous sources and in articles on important topics related to vaccines, rely on the official position of regulators. Information attacks on the Sputnik vaccine based on inaccurate and misleading information received from anonymous sources have become more frequent in the media, ” the Foundation said in a statement.

    The RDIF linked this with new research data that showed the advantage of the Sputnik V adenovirus vaccine over mRNA vaccines - these include drugs from Pfizer and Moderna already registered in the EU. “Official studies have shown that the effectiveness of mRNA vaccines against the delta variant of COVID-19 falls below 50% in just five months. In addition, an October article in The New England Journal of Medicine showed that vaccines based on the human adenovirus vector platform, such as Sputnik Light, show ten times stronger immunity at antibody and T- levels after eight months than mRNA vaccines, ” the Foundation says.

  • @garroulus

    Now it is 100% clear that ruling class want all people to be vaccinated. And they clearly have economic reason behind it, as they never cared about people health or even life.

    I still stand for version that we will have new strain that will have extreme fast spreading and delayed autoimmune response leading to fatal outcome and without vaccine it won't work as antibodies will be different for different people in this case.

  • https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/09/15/natural-immunity-vaccine-mandate/

    "It’s okay to have an incorrect scientific hypothesis. But when new data proves it wrong, you have to adapt. Unfortunately, many elected leaders and public health officials have held on far too long to the hypothesis that natural immunity offers unreliable protection against covid-19 — a contention that is being rapidly debunked by science."

  • For eight months, the titer of antibodies from mRNA vaccines falls dozens of times, and from vector vaccines it practically does not decrease, American researchers found out with the participation of specialists from Harvard and Cambridge Universities. This is reported by Naked Science, citing work published in The New England Journal of Medicine.

    Scientists examined 61 people who received mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna and a vector from Johnson & Johnson. A month after vaccination, the titers of antibodies to coronavirus after the administration of mRNA vaccines were several times higher than after the administration of the vector one. Eight months later, the antibody titers of those who received the vector vaccine remained at almost the same level. But in those vaccinated with vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, they fell so much that they turned out to be lower than those vaccinated with vaccines from Johnson & Johnson. Thus, in the long term, the effect of the vector vaccine was the most persistent and stable.

    https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMc2115596

  • @firstbase

    the injection is designed to make your body produce a foreign pathogen (the spike protein).

    I see some ill logic here, as it is openly stated by vaccine creators, also, if you check my older posts - most vaccines produce not original spike protein, but modified version that renders it to be useless for anything rather than small exposed parts that are used to make antibodies.

  • Another interview from Dr. David Martin who maintains this has been a long developing plan. Suggested in the interview is that this mRNA technology is a gene therapy, not a vaccine. It's an artificial, computer-generated medical countermeasure and the injection is designed to make your body produce a foreign pathogen (the spike protein). The thought is not to create an antiviral response in the body, but rather to hopefully, which is a key word here, hopefully produce an immune response to the spike protein pathogens we're instructing our bodies to create!

    There is collusion at the highest levels of governments And, he maintains, criminal liability and activity. Whether you accept his statements as axiomatic is up to you, but I believe it deserves to be viewed.

    Start viewing at the 50:00 minute mark if you wish a concise synopsis. I would urge everyone to watch the entire interview though.

    https://rumble.com/vm2zs1-urgent-news-we-all-must-know-by-dr.-david-e.-martin.html

  • We studied breakthrough infections among healthcare workers of a major infectious diseases hospital in Vietnam. We collected demographics, vaccination history and results of PCR diagnosis alongside clinical data. We measured SARS-CoV-2 (neutralizing) antibodies at diagnosis, and at week 1, 2 and 3 after diagnosis. We sequenced the viruses using ARTIC protocol.

    Viral loads of breakthrough Delta variant infection cases were 251 times higher than those of cases infected with old strains detected between March-April 2020.

    Breakthrough Delta variant infections are associated with high viral loads, prolonged PCR positivity, and low levels of vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies, explaining the transmission between the vaccinated people. Physical distancing measures remain critical to reduce SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant transmission.

    https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=786008073006113118011115105064080026039020070051029034123006104013043043007092113000110010064064002113114073095092082066102121078022007064064105080107070072080004092115016068020115073063066037048013012091068066064107095099109069102006030106116085075105108003075007120066020080119024068005008&EXT=pdf&INDEX=TRUE

    To condense - present vaccines had been carefully designed for Delta variant (during Alpha times!) to make vaccinated people ideal mass spreaders and also keep damaging their health as they still become sick.

  • The effectiveness of vaccines, we can see, has decreased because the virus mutates. This all stopped helping one hundred percent. They used to say: "Get vaccinated so you don't get sick," now they say: "Get vaccinated so as not to die." But this is not certain, because the vaccinated die too. But all the same, the probability of surviving a vaccinated person, as shown by recent studies, increases more than 10 times, and this is very encouraging for us.

    But vaccines are leaky as hell.

  • The results of a study carried out in Sweden and Italy showed that the majority of those who had had COVID-19 in the first six months had a slow decrease in the number of antibodies, after which the indicator was stable for up to 15 months.

    The authors collected 188 blood tests from 136 patients in whom the disease was accompanied by characteristic symptoms and proceeded in various forms, from mild to severe. Plasma from 108 people with a confirmed negative PCR test was used as a control sample.

    The scientists measured the titers of anti-S and anti-RBD antibodies in plasma. The former specifically target the spike protein, or the entire S-protein of the virus, while the latter target the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the S-protein, which plays a key role in the binding of the virus to cells. It is known that over time, mutations accumulate in the structure of the S-protein and RBD-domain, which reduce the neutralizing ability of antibodies. The task of the scientists was to determine the time during which the antibodies of plasma cells remain active.

    The results showed that at the peak of the immune response in recovering patients, the levels of anti-RBD immunoglobulins IgM and IgA were increased by 77 and 85 percent, respectively, but then dropped to 4.5 and 11 percent over six to fifteen months. Antibodies IgM and IgA to S-protein showed values ​​slightly higher - respectively 88 and 90 percent in the first one to three months and half less after 55-56 days.

    The titers of specific IgG antibodies to RBD and S-protein in 94 percent of patients reached a maximum 15-28 days after the onset of symptoms, then, after passing the peak of the antibody response, they gradually decreased by about four times by the end of the sixth month, and then remained stable up to 15 months. The high level of antibodies remained for longer in those who had been ill with COVID-19 in a severe form.

    For comparison, the scientists assessed the level of specific IgG antibodies in the plasma of the vaccinated. It turned out that 14-35 days after the introduction of the first dose of the vaccine, the antibody titers were similar to those in those who had recovered six months after infection, and after the second they corresponded to the maximum level of the natural response in recovering patients.

    In addition to the main strain SARS-CoV-2, the authors tested the effectiveness of antibodies against beta, gamma and delta variants within 15 months after infection and confirmed that the neutralizing activity of antibodies, albeit to a lesser extent, is preserved for of these variants of the coronavirus.

    In addition, the scientists measured the level of T-cell response, the peak of which was noted between the third and sixth months after infection, followed by a significant decrease after 12-15 months. However, the intensity and duration of the response did not depend on the severity of the disease.

    https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.08.463699v1

  • At the country-level, there appears to be no discernable relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases in the last 7 days (Fig. 1). In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people. Notably, Israel with over 60% of their population fully vaccinated had the highest COVID-19 cases per 1 million people in the last 7 days. The lack of a meaningful association between percentage population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases is further exemplified, for instance, by comparison of Iceland and Portugal. Both countries have over 75% of their population fully vaccinated and have more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people than countries such as Vietnam and South Africa that have around 10% of their population fully vaccinated.

    image

    Median, interquartile range and variation in cases per 100,000 people in the last 7 days across percentage of population fully vaccinated as of September 2, 2021

    image

    ercentage of counties that experienced an increase of cases between two consecutive 7-day time periods by percentage of population fully vaccinated across 2947 counties as of September 2, 2021

    image

    The sole reliance on vaccination as a primary strategy to mitigate COVID-19 and its adverse consequences needs to be re-examined, especially considering the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant and the likelihood of future variants. Other pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions may need to be put in place alongside increasing vaccination rates. Such course correction, especially with regards to the policy narrative, becomes paramount with emerging scientific evidence on real world effectiveness of the vaccines.

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-021-00808-7

    sa18476.jpg
    800 x 795 - 47K
    sa18477.jpg
    800 x 321 - 31K
    sa18478.jpg
    800 x 365 - 40K
  • @Endotoxic

    It appears so, sadly.

  • So it’s pretty clear that we are in a massive genocide Supported by laws, and new sanctions. In the future they will tell that it was for the grater good, now that everyone is dead, nobody Rises against them.

  • Short interview with Dr. Byram W. Bridle, PhD, who, upon reviewing much peer-reviewed data and research findings, has concluded that the vaccines are inadvertently (or intentionally) poisoning the inoculated because these spike proteins are not remaining localized in the arm: https://seed306.bitchute.com/qsqOliWyhidn/N5UAQT3s31TY.mp4

  • @firstbase

    Disturbing indeed! Thanks for sharing the info.

  • @Eno

    Agreed! If you can stomach it, watch this interesting video (scroll down page a bit) from Russia of a person undergoing a "cupping" procedure within 30 minutes of having been inoculated. The person's blood actually clots immediately like jello! Very disburbing!

    https://thecovidblog.com/2021/10/06/hijama-aka-cupping-desperate-workers-forced-into-vaxx-mandates-turn-to-ancient-treatment-to-remove-the-shots-after-injected/

  • @firstbase

    I can't say I know their true motives for the forced inoculations all over the world with those mRNA shoots, but one thing I'm certain of: they are NOT for our good or health!

  • @Vitaliy_Kiselev

    Population control due to shrinking resources and energy is even more frightening. I'm sorry for what our kids and grandkids are going to face, if they manage to survive.

  • @firstbase

    It is certainly not for tracking or control. :-)

    All is much more simple - they need less people to fit shrinking resources and energy.