Blog https://personal-view.com/talks/categories/blog/p161/feed.rss Sat, 23 Nov 24 14:22:13 +0000 Blog en-CA EU: Green guys demand you to eat worms instead of meat https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/25090/eu-green-guys-demand-you-to-eat-worms-instead-of-meat Fri, 15 Jan 2021 14:34:36 +0000 Vitaliy_Kiselev 25090@/talks/discussions

The EU Food Safety Authority has confirmed that yellow mealworms are human-friendly and rich in protein.

"The agency has assessed the risks of the insect as a new food for the first time, and this could pave the way for the first approval in the EU," said agency researcher Ermolaos Ververis.

image

Following this decision, the EU-wide marketing authorization for yellow mealworms - the larvae of the meal beetle - is expected to follow in the coming months. The main components of the product are protein, fat and fiber. When dried, the worms are said to taste similar to peanuts.

“There are clear environmental and economic benefits to replacing traditional sources of animal protein with ones that require less food, produce less waste and generate less greenhouse gases,” said University of Bologna professor Mario Mazzocchi.

My proposal is different - we need to use such researchers, politicians and clerks as nice food for worms, such way they will produce much less greenhouse gases, actually they will produce none.

]]>
Myths: Children, firm mattress and bed sharing https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/25088/myths-children-firm-mattress-and-bed-sharing Thu, 14 Jan 2021 21:04:16 +0000 Vitaliy_Kiselev 25088@/talks/discussions Quite long time ago capitalists decided that they need to sell more children beds and also sell special children mattresses.

So they got to scientists, paid them and things started to turn.

Various U.S. medical groups warn parents not to place their infants to sleep in adult beds due to serious safety risks. Bed-sharing puts babies at risk of suffocation, strangulation, and SIDS. Studies have found that bed-sharing is the most common cause of deaths in babies, especially those 3 months and younger. Because of the risks involved, both the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) advise against bed-sharing.

This guys just forgot to tell you that for small baby it is extreme stress to not have mommy around, touching him. As in nature it means almost certain near death, hence constant repeated cry if you put it even nearby. And issues with your own sleep as result. Not having mommy results in instant big hormones shift and affect development of brain and lot of other functions, including lack of good sleep resulting sometimes in organs defects.

Here strategy had been to use scaring - you can suffocate baby (real thing!), but issue is that by doing that they ask you to not make things much better but to make things worse. Can read some statistics on autism, multiple research show that major cause of this can be lack of physical closeness with mother. Btw, working mother before around age 4 add big part of issues also. But I never saw any of this paid researchers or press to ask for mothers to stay with children as long as possible, as their owners won't like this, but I saw tons of such research results during socialism.

With modern tech you much better to put some sensor on baby with alarm if you are afraid instead of this shit.

SIDS is any sudden or unexpected infant death that occurs during sleep within the first year of life and that cannot be explained after thorough investigation. Most SIDS cases occur within the first six months of life, and babies between the ages of 2 and 4 months are at the highest risk. SIDS remains the leading cause of death among U.S. babies.

Note here same tech as used during COVID early hysteria. If you look at statistics in 1990 they put almost 70% of any baby death in sleep as death from SIDS, as it is some fuzzy and totally undefined thing - no one cares. A babies sleep 19-20 hours a day and some babies obviously die due to health defects and such - you can get nice numbers. Lately they just asked doctors to change statistics and put same cases under different death categories. And now they cite numbers of ALL, 100% deaths during sleep, as such number is more impressive.

Suffocation from a soft mattress, memory foam, waterbed,

For almost 100% of real babies your soft mattress is NOT soft, it is hard, as baby is light. So this guys lie openly. They use games with words to cheat you into spending money.

And to make you pay they offer you to buy extremely hard mattress (as you need to feel difference to spend money, not because it must be such hard).

Why they want to sell you so hard thing? Because 99,9% of people don't buy such mattress for themselves, and your don't want your baby to suffer on your subpar mattress don't you, you want best for your baby, you want to check advises from best professionals.

Note how they put it:

Consumer Reports notes that if the mattress feels good or even okay for you, then it is definitely not a mattress your baby should be sleeping on.

This is how paid criminals get their salary.

Babies should always be placed to sleep on their backs on a firm mattress without any pillows, blankets, toys, stuffed animals, or other items.

Baby physically is not much different from adult, so sleeping without pillow on the back and on extremely hard mattress is not the thing baby likes.

Also if you open up any medical papers on suffocation you'll see that almost all of cases happen during.. sleeping on the back and with some issue with pillow - too high head position or too low. Such way you can have tongue blocking the airway.

Ideally manufacturers want to sell you thing like (feels similar to a brick):

image

And separate expensive bed.

In Mordor they did not have SIDS being promoted by media, so here reasons for same type mattresses usage are totally different. Media tell you that children spine is completely different and by making them sleep weird and with deformed spine we make stuff better. Money always make wonders in presstitutes heads.

]]>
War: On why US will have effectively one party system in 2021 already https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/25087/war-on-why-us-will-have-effectively-one-party-system-in-2021-already Thu, 14 Jan 2021 19:46:36 +0000 Vitaliy_Kiselev 25087@/talks/discussions

When capital is placed at the forefront of social organization, money begins to determine everything. Therefore, for capital, the ideal regime for organizing society will be such when everything (absolutely everything) is turned into a market. Including politics.

If politics is arranged like a market - with bargaining, free competition, professional political products and services (politicians, political strategists, mass media, PR, elections, etc.) - then in such a market the one who is able to pay the most wins. That is, the one who can buy specialists, technologies and form the necessary public opinion. That is, capital.

In such a mode of operation, the real, irreplaceable dictator in the form of specific persons or groups is always in the shadows. And in the arena of the political circus, professional political clowns are constantly changing, carrying out orders behind the scenes. Wasted and discredited actors are periodically thrown into the trash and replaced by new, even more fun characters. The electorate is happy. Capital as well.

Therefore, Freedom'n'Democracy ™ as the largest and most powerful capital, in an ultimatum order requires all other countries to strictly adhere to democratic procedures. In this case, he can freely enter any country, establish (buy) the required political regime and freely dictate his will. And all this is imperceptible, without unnecessary noise, under the guise of a democratic expression of the will of the people.

Those who refuse to turn their political system into a democratic market must be beaten and forced to freedom. To do this, Freedom'n'Democracy ™ has military bases around the world and military expenditures that exceed those of all other countries combined.

Why can't everyone in the world hold "fair elections" and be more democratic than the Pope?

If a country wants to pursue an independent policy, it simply cannot afford to host an open democratic market in which it cannot compete with the capitals of the world hegemon.

In this case, there are only two outputs:

  1. Give up independence. Completely lie under the fincap and resignedly accept all imposed decisions, counting on the mercy of the new owner.
  2. Abandon Democracy ™. Establish a political dictatorship with an irreplaceable political elite, covering all this with imitation of free elections.

From https://www.personal-view.com/talks/discussion/24970/socialism-on-liberals-and-bad-dicatatorships

China now has more real money and they are becoming hegemon. Hence - to protect political system US need to wrap up all this "free speech" games. Just check media history - all began and continued with Chinese witch hunt.

Yes, and China will teach US the manners and proper democracy :-)

]]>
War: Google revealed that they use total censorship now at their will https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/25086/war-google-revealed-that-they-use-total-censorship-now-at-their-will Thu, 14 Jan 2021 19:24:27 +0000 Vitaliy_Kiselev 25086@/talks/discussions

Silicon Valley tech giant Google revealed that the company removed some local news content from its search results in Australia as part of an “experiment.” Critics have called the situation a “chilling illustration” of the power that Google holds over the internet.

Google had tweaked its algorithm to bury links from major Australian news providers. Google confirmed the tweak and downplayed it, adding that it conducts “tens of thousands of experiments” every year.

A company spokesperson commented: “Every year we conduct tens of thousands of experiments in Google Search. We’re currently running a few experiments that will each reach about 1% of Google Search users in Australia to measure the impacts of news businesses and Google Search on each other. In 2018, the value we provided to publishers through referral traffic alone was estimated at $218 million dollars.”

Google reportedly plans to end the experiment in February.

Actually you can't prove how many users are affected by "experiment", as only Goolge know this.

This guys made big tweaking for years before today, just made it all silent.

]]>
War: It didn't take long - Telegram declared as place for white extremists supremacists https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/25084/war-it-didnt-take-long-telegram-declared-as-place-for-white-extremists-supremacists Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:27:22 +0000 Vitaliy_Kiselev 25084@/talks/discussions

Right-wing extremists are using channels on the encrypted communication app Telegram to call for violence against government officials on Jan. 20, the day President-elect Joe Biden is inaugurated, with some extremists sharing knowledge of how to make, conceal and use homemade guns and bombs.

The messages are being posted in Telegram chatrooms where white supremacist content has been freely shared for months, but chatter on the channels has increased since extremists have been forced off other platforms in the wake of the siege of the U.S. Capitol last week by pro-Trump rioters.

In the days since the Capitol attack, for example, an Army field manual and exhortations to "shoot politicians" and "encourage armed struggle" have been posted in a Telegram channel that uses "fascist" in its name.

Far-right Telegram chat room membership has ballooned in recent days, particularly since the popular platform Parler, financed by the wealthy conservative backer Rebekah Mercer, went offline Monday after Amazon rescinded its web-hosting service.

There are multiple Telegram channels for the right-wing group called the Proud Boys, and the largest of them have more than 28,000 members. One channel frequented by Proud Boys has been renamed to attract ex-Parler users.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/extremists-move-secret-line-channels-plan-inauguration-day-d-c-n1253876

So, it can be US who will ban Telegram :-)

]]>
Energy: Green energy in EU is a lie and actually destroys nature https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/25083/energy-green-energy-in-eu-is-a-lie-and-actually-destroys-nature Thu, 14 Jan 2021 13:57:10 +0000 Vitaliy_Kiselev 25083@/talks/discussions Biomass, the main source of which is wood from forests, now accounts for almost 60% of renewable energy sources in the EU, and this is more than solar and wind combined. And this at a time when in Europe it is impossible to take a step without seeing some windmill or a solar panel, and any European news site constantly writes about the success of windmills and solar energy.

In Estonia, Natura 2000 lost more than 15,000 hectares of forest cover between 2001 and 2019, which is more than double the area of ​​Manhattan and has accounted for 80% of this loss in the last five years. But the government has no plans to stop and is engaged in further changes in the rules in other national parks in Estonia.

Almost all European countries have recorded an increase in the volume of logging for energy. Almost a quarter of the trees felled in the EU in 2019 were used for energy production, up from 17% in 2000.

Between 2008 and 2018, subsidies for biomass, the main source of which is wood, among 27 European countries increased by 143%. In the UK, government support for biomass projects is expected to total more than £ 13 billion by 2027 - the expiration date for existing subsidy agreements, according to climate think tank Ember.

In 2019, the British government paid the Drax power plant € 2.4 million a day for green electricity. Drax will receive more than € 11.2 billion from the UK government from its switch to biomass in 2012 until the subsidies expire in 2027.

The UK is currently the largest payer of bioenergy subsidies in Europe is spending over £1.9 billion in 2019 primarily on imported wood combustion at Drax.

Other European governments are following this example. In the Netherlands, the government has promised energy companies RWE, Uniper and Onyx more than €3.5 billion in biomass subsidies, making the country one of the largest wood pellet importers in Europe.

This is why pinky left want total control other any media - they should not tell you about their doings, at least not make it mainstream information.

]]>
War: Baiden can introduce stock market reform to solve debt problems https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/25079/war-baiden-can-introduce-stock-market-reform-to-solve-debt-problems Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:44:22 +0000 Vitaliy_Kiselev 25079@/talks/discussions New interesting story going around in certain circles last week.

Present idea of pinky left is as follow:

  • Keep inflating stock market bubble
  • Suddenly during late Friday after markets closure they will introduce "Stock reform bill"
  • Bill also will include special measurements to people who have too much debt - forced labor
  • It will make any stock holder equally responsible for all company debts
  • Bill will pass within next 3 hours and will be signed by president within on hour
  • During weekend all major companies will publish their real debt, including subsidiaries, removing cooking they used to hide it
  • On monday stock prices of around 70% of companies will plummet
  • All tech giants prices will go into negative area
  • All outstanding debt will be moved into investment funds and from them into real people
  • All pension funds will go negative
  • 80% of population during this 72 hours will have no assets with positive value (only negative) and will have outstanding debt requiring forced labor for many years
  • Such way they hope to drop companies expenses to labor as much as 4-5 times.
  • All this will happen during 2nd and 3rd week of new, more deadly virus reveal
  • All US will be in total lockdown during this time and all US cities will have martial law for 12 hours each day
  • All mass media will support and prize it
  • Any opposition to bill will be officially named as "domestic terrorists" according to bill that passed early
]]>
EU: Inequality gap widens very fast https://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/25078/eu-inequality-gap-widens-very-fast Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:17:03 +0000 Vitaliy_Kiselev 25078@/talks/discussions

The top ten percent possess over two thirds of all individual net  assets, while previously it was thought to only be 59 percent. The  richest percent of the population has around 35 percent of the wealth,  not 22 percent as previously thought. Around 1.5 per- cent of adults in  Germany have assets in the amount of at least one million euros. These  individuals do not only differ from the rest of the population in terms  of wealth: They are also more often older men, more highly educated,  self-​employed, and more satisfied with their lives. ...

image

image

https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.794209.de/dwr-20-30-1.pdf

]]>