Tagged with rx10 - Personal View Talks

Sony RX10, 1" sensor, big F2.8 constant zoom, video oriented machine

Vitaliy_Kiselev — Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:29:04 +0000

Specifications:

1" CMOS sensor, 13.2 X 8.8mm, 20.9Mp
BIONZ® X image processor
24-200mm F2.8 zoom, Carl Zeiss® Vario-Sonnar T*, 14 elements, 11 groups, 7 aspheric elements
26-212mm in movie mode (29-315mm in SteadyShot Active Mode)
Video modes
- 28M PS (1920 x 1080, 60p)
- 24M FX (1920 x 1080, 60i)
- 17M FH (1920 x 1080, 60i)
- 24M FX (1920 x 1080, 24p)
- 17M FH (1920 x 1080, 24p)
Mikes - Built-in stereo microphone or external ECM-CG50 / XLR-K1M
Adjustable audio level
Headphone output
Microhone jack
OLED EVF
3.0” 1,228,000 dots tiltable LCD
Histogram and Peaking (level and color selectable)
Contrast-detect AF, 25 points
Continuous Speed - 10 fps
Wi-Fi and NFC
Multi Interface Shoe
129.0 mm x 88.1 mm x 102.2 mm
$1298 price
755 g

Preorder at:

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1009156-REG/sony_dscrx10_b_cyber_shot_dsc_rx10_digital_camera.html

gh4 or rx10 mark III?

rezyserzycia — Tue, 31 May 2016 19:31:14 +0000

guys

I had a gh1, later a gh2, now gh3 and today i'm thinking to upgrade my equipment and I got little problem. Go again to the panny family and buy a gh4 or buy a rx10 mark III (the lens and slow motion is crazy for me).What do you think?

Im doing a youtube videos, not something special and pro. Thanks for advice!

Help to decide: RX10/100 or Nx500 or A6000 or G(x)7

vulgatron — Sat, 01 Aug 2015 17:46:10 +0000

Hi everyone, I'm currently using a GX7 with the PanaLeica 25 1.4 and a 14mm 2.5 as my main camera. It does great, but sometimes I miss more dynamic range and more DOF, so I'm considering moving to an APS system. I mainly use my camera for video, but also need a cam that takes good pics.

Do you thing the A6000 with the 16-50, 35 1.8 and sigma 60 2.8 would be an improvement over my actual equipment? I have no rigs so stabilised lenses are a plus for video. Ideally I'll get a EM5 (II) but the video seems kinda lacking.

On the other side, 4k is very appealing, since I can get better 1080 and crop to stabilise clips, so I'm considering the NX500. I could get the NX500 with the 16-50, the 30 f2 and maybe the 45 1.8. Would this be a better choice, considering overall image quality?

What are your thoughts on lowlight video with this cameras? Does the APS sensor a better job than m4/3? Also any of those other lenses are comparable to the PanaLeica? I like how it renders everything. Which leads me to maybe even consider the G7 and keep the lenses, only the 25mm and then get the 14-42 kit.

Maybe that option makes more sense unless there's a considerable difference with any of the other combos.

I would love to get 120fps (i know the nx500 does it at 720) but the NX1 or GH4 are out of my range. So I'm even considering the new RX100 iv, since the zoom range works great for me, would that be a step back? Specially DR and lowlight performing or the SLOG is an advantage?

Please let me know your thoughts and experiences so I can clear up my mind!

Cheers

SOLD: Sony RX10 II - New in Box

davedv — Tue, 06 Oct 2015 16:46:41 +0000

Selling a brand new, Sony RX10 II camera. Never used it, still in its original box. 4K internal recording, f/2.8 zoom lens, great slow motion features (up to 120 fps in full HD or 960 fps at reduced resolution).

Bought it for a project that never ended up happening.

Asking $1150 shipped within the continental US. Willing to ship internationally, if buyer will pay costs.