Tagged with legal - Personal View Talks http://personal-view.com/talks/discussions/tagged/legal/feed.rss Tue, 05 Nov 24 03:48:41 +0000 Tagged with legal - Personal View Talks en-CA U.S. High School Student Expelled for Refusal to Wear Location Tracking RFID and Critique of Program http://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/5294/u.s.-high-school-student-expelled-for-refusal-to-wear-location-tracking-rfid-and-critique-of-program Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:12:23 +0000 thepalalias 5294@/talks/discussions Andrea Hernandez, a sophmore high school student at John Jay High School, is in a legal battle after her high school attempted to expel her for refusing to comply with a newly instituted high school RFID program to track the students. To quote the district spokesman Pascual Gonzalez:

“What we have found, they are there, they’re in the building and not in their chairs. They are in the cafeteria, with counselors, in stairwells or a variety of places, some legitimately and some not. If they are on campus, we can legally count them present.”

Source: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/09/rfid-chip-student-monitoring/

The above Wired article mentions further details:

"Gonzalez said John Jay High has 200 surveillance cameras and Anson Jones Middle School, about 90.

'The kids,' he said, 'are used to being monitored.'”

Other articles mentioned the school's attempt to broker a deal with the girl and her family, including this one at OpposingViews.com:

"Civil liberties lawyers at the Rutherford Institute told Infowars.com that they are going to file a temporary restraining order petition to prevent the school from kicking Hernandez out.

In response to public outcry and pressure from rights groups, John Jay High School has offered to remove the battery and chip, but wouldn’t budge on the ID.

The offer would also require the Hernandez family to end their public criticism and agree to support the policy, something Andrea’s father Steve Hernandez finds unacceptable."

Source: Article by OpposingViews.com at http://www.opposingviews.com/i/technology/gadgets/student-andrea-hernandez-expelled-refusing-wear-location-tracking-rfid-badge*

The OpposingViews.com article also mentions that Hernandez opposes the program on grounds of both privacy and religion.

Here are some other links to coverage of the subject, both in the U.S. and the U.K.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20461752

http://now.msn.com/andrea-hernandez-suspended-for-refusing-to-wear-an-rfid-locator-tag-can-stay-at-school-until-court-hearing

http://www.zdnet.com/student-expelled-for-refusing-to-wear-rfid-tracking-chip-badge-7000007723/

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/11/texas-school-districts-rfid-tracking-of-students-goes-to-court/

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/13463095-student-tracker-project-in-texas-schools-leads-to-court-row

http://rt.com/usa/news/school-hernandez-rfid-student-449/

http://www.goddiscussion.com/104442/high-school-student-faces-expulsion-for-refusal-to-wear-device-she-believes-is-satanic/

Details mentioned in some of them include the plans in Texas to spread the mandatory RDIF program statewide.

I've done my best to provide ones from sites with various political leanings and editorial foci because:

  • 1) I feel that it's helpful to read several articles on a subject to get a sense for what is actually going on.
  • 2) I do not believe that this is an issue limited to either conservatives or liberals in the United States.

It is my personal opinion (though it is only my opinion and not a fact, and should be debated if disagreed with) that this program:

  • 1) Should never have been implemented.
  • 2) Does not serve the students or parents.
  • 3) Will rarely benefit teachers.
  • 4) May benefit school administrations financially.
  • 5) Is disturbing in its approach to tracking U.S. citizens that have neither committed a crime nor found themselves the subject of a criminal investigation.
  • 6) Violates the rights of the parents to grant or deny their consent to a controversial school measure.
  • 7) Violates the spirit of the Constitution, whether or not it violates the exact wording of it (and may potentially violate both).

That's at least one part of my opinion. I hope you'll share this issue with others you know. If you disagree with me, I would still like to hear your thoughts. I hope that I can learn from seeing the issue through someone else's eyes.

]]>
Shortfilm preparation - legal question regarding film score http://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/11862/shortfilm-preparation-legal-question-regarding-film-score Fri, 28 Nov 2014 06:25:17 +0000 Chris74 11862@/talks/discussions Hi I'm currently working on my next short and have some legal/copyright question. As usual, we plan on recording most of the film score ourselves but this time, there will be a scene where I need a TV comedy as background sound (no picture). How is it with rights. Plan would be to simply record 2-3 min of a real TV comedy. Can I use this without paying specific rights, no matter what I record? (widely known or unknown TV comedy).

Help appreciated and sorry if this has already been answered here, haven't had the time to browse.

Cheers Chris

]]>
Youtube converts legal range video to full range?? http://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/9452/youtube-converts-legal-range-video-to-full-range Sat, 25 Jan 2014 20:10:57 +0000 joethepro 9452@/talks/discussions Ijust uploaded a legal range (16-235) H264 video to youtube, and it seems to have converted it back to full range, its pretty obvious in the darks. I know for a fact it is a legal range video, I rendered it from Resolve that way.

Is there any way to get it to upload in the original format, or does youtube always mess with your videos?

]]>
Legal Question: BIN Files vs. .INI Files http://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/2592/legal-question-bin-files-vs.-.ini-files Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:16:39 +0000 thepalalias 2592@/talks/discussions In the same day I recently had several people ask me whether I could provide pre-compiled .BIN files for them (clients, friends, etc.) and I realized that I hadn't seen them posted online before - only the .INI files.

My question is, is there a legal reason for this? Is it acceptable for me to host a .INI file of the audio settings I've helped cultivate since October but not to post a .BIN file with them applied? Or is it simply that everyone here would rather get hands on with the files themselves (which I can easily understand :)?

I don't want to inadvertently create problems or friction and don't have the expertise to decipher the situation without input.

Thanks in advance for any thoughts on the matter!

]]>