Tagged with 16-35 - Personal View Talks http://personal-view.com/talks/discussions/tagged/16-35/feed.rss Tue, 05 Nov 24 03:40:37 +0000 Tagged with 16-35 - Personal View Talks en-CA FS: Canon EF 16-35mm 2.8 L Mark I http://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/13106/fs-canon-ef-16-35mm-2.8-l-mark-i Wed, 03 Jun 2015 03:48:20 +0000 crammond 13106@/talks/discussions I'm selling my used but perfect Canon EF 16-35mm 2.8 L Mark I lens. It's been in my possession for the last 4 years and it has worked perfectly. Very satisfied with it while using it with 7D, 5D2, 5D3 and 6D bodies. Since than I've switched to C100 and I'd like something with Image Stabilizer.

There are no scratches on the glass elements (front & rear). Wear marks on the lens hood thread on the body (see it on the pictures). A couple of dust particles under the front glass element - they don't affect the picture quality.

It comes with front and back lens cap, UV filter 77mm, 2 lens hoods (one original that shows some wear marks and one knock off which is like new) and a canon lens soft bag.

Possible trade for a 17-55 2.8 IS + cash.

The lens is located in Europe, can ship (almost) worldwide.

700€ + shipping.

]]> Canon 16-35 (II vs Original) http://personal-view.com/talks/discussion/7707/canon-16-35-ii-vs-original Wed, 07 Aug 2013 08:36:59 +0000 digger 7707@/talks/discussions Can anyone who has used both lenses for video speak to the practical differences between the two? I am aware of the tech spec differences (10 groups / 14 elements vs 12 groups / 16 elements, weight, filter sizes), but I would be using it with a FS700 and Speed Booster & 5D mainly for video. If I can get a great deal on the original, I'm wondering if I would be losing out on anything that the II model gives you.

]]>